Open governance systems: Doing more with more

Abstract This paper tackles many of the important issues and discussions taking place in Europe and globally about the future of the public sector and how it can use Information and Communication Technology (ICT) to respond innovatively and effectively to some of the acute societal challenges arising from the financial crisis as well as other deeper rooted global problems. These include inequality, poverty, corruption and migration, as well as climate change, loss of habitat and the ageing society. A conceptual framework for open governance systems enabled by ICT is proposed, drawing on evidence and examples from around the world as well as a critical appraisal of both academic and grey literature. The framework constructs a system of open assets, open services and open engagement, and this is used to move the e-government debate forward from a preoccupation with lean and small governments which ‘do more with less’ to examine the potential for open governance systems to also ‘do more with more’. This is achieved by enabling an open government and open public sector, as part of this open governance system, to ‘do more by leveraging more’ of the existing assets and resources across the whole of society, and not just within the public sector, many of which are unrealised and untapped, so in effect are ‘wasted’. The paper argues that efficiencies and productivity improvements are essential at all levels and across all actors, as is maximising both public and private value, but that they must also be seen at the societal level where trade-offs and interactions are required, and not only at the individual actor level.

[1]  J. Rifkin The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism , 2014 .

[2]  T. Piketty Capital in the twenty-first century: a multidimensional approach to the history of capital and social classes. , 2013, The British journal of sociology.

[3]  C. Hood A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS , 1991 .

[4]  Marthe Nyssens,et al.  Conceptions of Social Enterprise and Social Entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and Divergences , 2010 .

[5]  Young Hoon Kwak,et al.  An Open Government Maturity Model for social media-based public engagement , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[6]  Gail Whiteman,et al.  The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism Jeremy Rifkin Palgrave Macmillan: 2014. , 2014 .

[7]  Lisa Gansky,et al.  The Mesh: Why the Future of Business Is Sharing , 2010 .

[8]  Chris Anderson,et al.  Makers: The New Industrial Revolution , 2012 .

[9]  J. Braun,et al.  The poorest and hungry: assessments, analyses, and actions. , 2009 .

[10]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  Innovation Processes in the Public Sector - New Vistas for an Interdisciplinary Perspective on E-Government Research? , 2007, EGOV.

[11]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Lean government and platform-based governance - Doing more with less , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[12]  D. Harrisson,et al.  Intersectoral Alliance and Social Innovation: When Corporations Meet Civil Society , 2012 .

[13]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Investigating Outcomes of T-Government Using a Public Value Management Approach , 2012, EGOV.

[14]  Charles Seaford Redistribution: , 2019, A War on Global Poverty.

[15]  Jeremy Millard,et al.  Are You Being Served?: Transforming E-Government through Service Personalisation , 2011, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[17]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Creating Open Government Ecosystems: A Research and Development Agenda , 2012, Future Internet.

[18]  S. Durmusoglu Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2004 .

[19]  Christian Bason,et al.  Leading Public Sector Innovation: Co-creating for a Better Society , 2010 .

[20]  Mila Gascó-Hernández,et al.  Open Government. Opportunities and Challenges for Public Governance , 2014 .

[21]  G. Stoker Public Value Management , 2006 .

[22]  R. Wilkinson,et al.  The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better , 2009 .

[23]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  Moving from E-Government to T-Government: A Study of Process Reengineering Challenges in a UK Local Authority Context , 2008, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[24]  M. Moore Creating public value : strategic management in government , 1995 .

[25]  Dennis Linders,et al.  Proactive e-governance: flipping the service delivery model in Taiwan , 2013, ICEGOV.

[26]  Antonio Cordella,et al.  A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[27]  S. Kotha Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition , 1992 .

[28]  R. Thaler,et al.  Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness , 2008 .

[29]  Mark Bevir,et al.  A Theory of Governance , 2013 .

[30]  Richard G. Wilkinson,et al.  The Impact of Inequality: How to Make Sick Societies Healthier , 2005 .

[31]  Patrice McDermott,et al.  Building open government , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[32]  M. Mazzucato The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs Private Sector Myths (an excerpt) , 2015, Journal of Economic Sociology.

[33]  R. A. Mashelkar,et al.  Innovation's Holy grail , 2010 .

[34]  Tom Christensen,et al.  The Whole‐of‐Government Approach to Public Sector Reform , 2007 .

[35]  Patrick Dunleavy,et al.  New public management is dead. Long live digital-era governance , 2005 .

[36]  C. K. Prahalad,et al.  Fortune at the bottom of the pyramid, the: eradicating poverty through profits , 2006 .

[37]  Chris Anderson,et al.  The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business is Selling Less of More , 2006 .