Soft-tissue detectability in cone-beam CT: evaluation by 2AFC tests in relation to physical performance metrics.

Soft-tissue detectability in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was evaluated via two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) tests. Investigations included the dependence of detectability on radiation dose, the influence of the asymmetric three-dimensional (3D) noise-power spectrum (NPS) in axial and sagittal or coronal planes, and the effect of prior knowledge on detectability. Custom-built phantoms (approximately 15 cm diameter cylinders) containing soft-tissue-simulating spheres of variable contrast and diameter were imaged on an experimental CBCT bench. The proportion of correct responses (Pcorr) in 2AFC tests was analyzed as a figure of merit, ideally equal to the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Pcorr was evaluated as a function of the sphere diameter (1.6-12.7 mm), contrast (20-165 HU), dose (1-7 mGy), plane of visualization (axial/sagittal), apodization filter (Hanning and Ram-Lak), and prior knowledge provided to the observer [ranging from stimulus known exactly (SKE) to stimulus unknown (SUK)]. Detectability limits were characterized in terms of the dose required to achieve a given level of Pcorr (e.g., 70%). For example, a 20 HU stimulus of diameter down to approximately 6 mm was detected with Pcorr 70% at dose > or =2 mGy. Detectability tended to be greater in axial than in sagittal planes, an effect amplified by sharper apodization filters in a manner consistent with 3D NPS asymmetry. Prior knowledge had a marked influence on detectability--e.g., Pcorr for a approximately 6 mm (20 HU) sphere was approximately 55%-65% under SUK conditions, compared to approximately 70%-85% for SKE conditions. Human observer tests suggest practical implications for implementation of CBCT: (i) Detectability limits help to define minimum-dose imaging techniques for specific imaging tasks; (ii) detectability of a given structure can vary between axial and sagittal/coronal planes, owing to the spatial-frequency content of the 3D NPS in relation to the imaging task; and (iii) performance under SKE conditions (e.g., image guidance tasks in which lesion characteristics are known) is maintained at a lower dose than in SUK conditions (e.g., diagnostic tasks in which lesion characteristics are unknown).

[1]  D. Hadley,et al.  Radiation dose to the lens from computed tomography scanning in a neuroradiology department. , 1995, The British journal of radiology.

[2]  Jan-Jakob Sonke,et al.  Automatic prostate localization on cone-beam CT scans for high precision image-guided radiotherapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  John D Hazle,et al.  Design and performance characteristics of a digital flat-panel computed tomography system. , 2006, Medical physics.

[4]  Jeffrey H. Siewerdsen,et al.  Flat-panel cone-beam CT: a novel imaging technology for image-guided procedures , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[5]  P. Grangeat.  Mathematical framework of cone beam 3D reconstruction via the first derivative of the radon transform , 1991 .

[6]  Jeffrey H. Siewerdsen,et al.  Three-dimensional NEQ transfer characteristics of volume CT using direct- and indirect-detection flat-panel imagers , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[7]  L. Feldkamp,et al.  Practical cone-beam algorithm , 1984 .

[8]  A. Burgess,et al.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. , 2001, Medical physics.

[9]  J. Swets.  ROC analysis applied to the evaluation of medical imaging techniques. , 1979, Investigative radiology.

[10]  M Defrise,et al.  Three-dimensional image reconstruction from complete projections , 1989, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  S. Richard,et al.  A simple, direct method for x-ray scatter estimation and correction in digital radiography and cone-beam CT. , 2005, Medical physics.

[12]  J. Boone,et al.  Evaluation of the spatial resolution characteristics of a cone-beam breast CT scanner. , 2006, Medical physics.

[13]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  Respiratory correlated cone beam CT. , 2005, Medical physics.

[14]  T R Nelson,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of DgN(CT) coefficients for pendant-geometry cone-beam breast computed tomography. , 2004, Medical physics.

[15]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. III. Calculation of figures of merit for model observers in statistically nonstationary backgrounds. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[16]  TU-D-I-611-05: Monte Carlo Investigation of Scatter Contribution to Kilovoltage Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images , 2005 .

[17]  H H Barrett,et al.  Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[18]  J. Wong,et al.  Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. IV. Figures of merit for model performance in multiple-alternative forced-choice detection tasks with correlated responses. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[20]  Arthur E. Burgess.  On Sampling Statistics In Observer Performance Studies , 1989, Other Conferences.

[21]  A. Rose,et al.  Quantum and noise limitations of the visual process. , 1953, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[22]  K. Hanson,et al.  Detectability in computed tomographic images. , 1979, Medical physics.

[23]  D. Jaffray,et al.  A framework for noise-power spectrum analysis of multidimensional images. , 2002, Medical physics.

[24]  Walter Huda,et al.  Patient size and x-ray technique factors in head computed tomography examinations. II. Image quality. , 2004, Medical physics.

[25]  Michael J. Flynn,et al.  Measurement of the spatial resolution of a clinical volumetric computed tomography scanner using a sphere phantom , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[26]  Bruce D. Smith.  Image Reconstruction from Cone-Beam Projections: Necessary and Sufficient Conditions and Reconstruction Methods , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  A. Burgess.  Comparison of receiver operating characteristic and forced choice observer performance measurement methods. , 1995, Medical physics.

[28]  Richard L. Van Metter,et al.  Enhanced latitude for digital projection radiography , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[29]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Derivation of a detectability index for correlated responses in multiple-alternative forced-choice experiments. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[30]  Jeffrey H. Siewerdsen,et al.  Intraoperative Cone-beam CT for Guidance of Temporal Bone Surgery , 2006, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[31]  R M Leahy,et al.  Derivation and analysis of a filtered backprojection algorithm for cone beam projection data. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[32]  Günter Lauritsch,et al.  Towards cardiac C-arm computed tomography , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[33]  C. Metz.  Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[34]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[35]  D. C. Barber,et al.  Medical Imaging-The Assessment of Image Quality , 1996 .

[36]  R Fahrig,et al.  Three-dimensional computed tomographic reconstruction using a C-arm mounted XRII: correction of image intensifier distortion. , 1997, Medical physics.

[37]  T Bortfeld,et al.  Correction of scatter in megavoltage cone-beam CT , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[38]  John M Boone,et al.  Technique factors and their relationship to radiation dose in pendant geometry breast CT. , 2005, Medical physics.

[39]  H. Tuy.  AN INVERSION FORMULA FOR CONE-BEAM RECONSTRUCTION* , 1983 .

[40]  A E Burgess,et al.  The Rose model, revisited. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[41]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Generalized DQE analysis of radiographic and dual-energy imaging using flat-panel detectors. , 2005, Medical physics.

[42]  Jeffrey H. Siewerdsen,et al.  Cone-beam CT with a flat-panel imager: noise considerations for fully 3D computed tomography , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[43]  M F Kijewski,et al.  The noise power spectrum of CT images. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[44]  David A Jaffray,et al.  Patient dose from kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography imaging in radiation therapy. , 2006, Medical physics.

[45]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Intraoperative cone-beam CT for guidance of head and neck surgery: Assessment of dose and image quality using a C-arm prototype. , 2006, Medical physics.

[46]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Investigation of C‐Arm Cone‐Beam CT‐Guided Surgery of the Frontal Recess , 2005, The Laryngoscope.

[47]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: initial performance characterization. , 2000, Medical physics.

[48]  Yi Sun,et al.  Analysis and evaluation of the MTF of cone-beam CT , 2005, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[49]  Brian E. Chapman,et al.  Two-alternative forced-choice evaluation of 3D CT angiograms , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[50]  B. Wilson,et al.  Volume CT with a flat-panel detector on a mobile, isocentric C-arm: pre-clinical investigation in guidance of minimally invasive surgery. , 2005, Medical physics.

[51]  John J Heine,et al.  Spectral analysis of full field digital mammography data. , 2002, Medical physics.

[52]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality. II. Fisher information, Fourier crosstalk, and figures of merit for task performance. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[53]  A ROSE,et al.  Quantum effects in human vision. , 1957, Advances in biological and medical physics.

[54]  D. Jaffray,et al.  Optimization of x-ray imaging geometry (with specific application to flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography). , 2000, Medical physics.

[55]  D L Parker,et al.  Observer performance methodologies for evaluating blood vessel visibility in MR angiograms using accurate geometric registration to high resolution x‐ray angiograms , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[56]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Maximum a-posteriori detection and figures of merit for detection under uncertainty , 1990, Medical Imaging.

[57]  W. Huda,et al.  Patient size and x-ray technique factors in head computed tomography examinations. I. Radiation doses. , 2004, Medical physics.

[58]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[59]  Biao Chen,et al.  Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: feasibility study. , 2002, Medical physics.

[60]  Srinivasan Vedantham,et al.  Investigation of optimal kVp settings for CT mammography using a flat-panel imager , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[61]  J. Debus,et al.  Management of acoustic neuromas with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT): long-term results in 106 patients treated in a single institution. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[62]  H H Barrett,et al.  Statistical limitations in transaxial tomography. , 1976, Computers in biology and medicine.

[63]  F. Noo,et al.  TH‐E‐330A‐02: A Local Fourier Description of Artifacts in Circular Cone Beam Computed Tomography , 2006 .

[64]  M. Oldham,et al.  Cone-beam-CT guided radiation therapy: technical implementation. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[65]  C E Metz,et al.  Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. , 1989, Investigative radiology.

[66]  Jeffrey H. Siewerdsen,et al.  Incorporation of task in 3D imaging performance evaluation: the impact of asymmetric NPS on detectability , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.