Spatial representation of frequency‐modulated signals in the tonotopically organized auditory cortex analogue of the chick

For auditory communication, many birds, including domestic chicks, use a variety of frequency‐modulated (FM) sounds. As a first approach to the spatial representation of such sounds in the central auditory system, we have analyzed 2‐deoxyglucose (2DG) patterns that were produced by FM stimuli in the tonotopic map of the auditory forebrain area (field L/hyperstriatum ventrale complex) of domestic chicks. Linear FM signals, varying in the depth and range of modulation, and in the direction and rate of the frequency change, were tested. Also included were signals designed to mimic species‐specific FM calls. All FM stimuli activated those regions of the map in which frequencies contained in the stimulus spectra were tonotopically represented. However, frequency and amplitude of the FM spectra were not faithfully reproduced by activation of the complete corresponding tonotopic space. FM signals that differed only in the direction of modulation, and therefore had identical long‐term spectra, induced maximum 2DG activation at different locations of the tonotopic gradient. FM signals that differed in the rate of change of frequency produced maxima of 2DG uptake at different positions along an isofrequency dimension of the map. These results suggest that the direction of modulation may be represented in a complex fashion along the tonotopic axis of the structure, whereas the rate of change of frequency may be represented along an isofrequency dimension. None of the experiments provided evidence of FM‐selective regions within the auditory forebrain complex. However, numerous telencephalic areas, in addition to the primary auditory area, were strongly activated in chicks stimulated with artificial “species‐specific” FM signals. These areas could be involved in the processing of biologically relevant stimuli, requiring attention, recognition, and interpretation of the signals. © 1992 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  H. Scheich,et al.  Social stress increases [14C]2-deoxyglucose incorporation in three rostral forebrain areas of the young chick , 1986, Behavioural Brain Research.

[2]  Tonotopic organization and functional characterization of the auditory thalamus in a songbird, the European starling , 1987, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[3]  Gilbert Gottleib.  On the acoustic basis of species identification in wood ducklings (Aix sponsa). , 1974 .

[4]  H. Scheich,et al.  Acoustic imprinting in guinea fowl chicks: age dependence of 2-deoxyglucose uptake in relevant forebrain areas. , 1987, Brain research.

[5]  G. Langner,et al.  Functional organization of some auditory nuclei in the Guinea Fowl demonstrated by the 2-Deoxyglucose technique , 2004, Cell and Tissue Research.

[6]  H Scheich,et al.  Contribution of GABAergic inhibition to the response characteristics of auditory units in the avian forebrain. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  G. Gottlieb.  Development of species identification in ducklings: VII. Highly specific early experience fosters species-specific perception in wood ducklings. , 1980 .

[8]  H. Scheich,et al.  Functional organization of the avian auditory cortex analogue. I. Topographic representation of isointensity bandwidth , 1991, Brain Research.

[9]  I. Whitfield,et al.  RESPONSES OF AUDITORY CORTICAL NEURONS TO STIMULI OF CHANGING FREQUENCY. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  H. Scheich,et al.  Quantitative analysis and two-dimensional reconstruction of the tonotopic organization of the auditory field L in the chick from 2-deoxyglucose data , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  H. Scheich,et al.  Effects of unilateral and bilateral cochlea removal on 2‐deoxyglucose patterns in the chick auditory system , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[12]  G Gottlieb,et al.  On the acoustic basis of species identification in wood ducklings (Aix sponsa). , 1975, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[13]  H. Scheich,et al.  Connectivity of the auditory forebrain nuclei in the Guinea Fowl (Numida meleagris) , 1979, Cell and Tissue Research.

[14]  D. P. Phillips,et al.  Responses of single neurones in cat auditory cortex to time-varying stimuli: frequency-modulated tones of narrow excursion , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  E. M. Barnes,et al.  Ontogeny of GABAergic neurons in chick brain: studies in vivo and in vitro. , 1986, Brain research.

[16]  H. Scheich,et al.  Acoustic imprinting leads to differential 2-deoxy-D-glucose uptake in the chick forebrain. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  S. Erulkar,et al.  Excitation and inhibition in cochlear nucleus. II. Frequency-modulated tones. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  H. Scheich,et al.  Tone-Versus FM-Induced patterns of excitation and suppression in the 14-C-2-Deoxyglucose labeled auditory “Cortex” of the Guinea fowl , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  N Suga,et al.  Analysis of frequency‐modulated sounds by auditory neurones of echo‐locating bats. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  M. Biederman-Thorson.  Auditory responses of units in the ovoid nucleus and cerebrum (field L) of the ring dove. , 1970, Brain research.

[21]  M. Joos,et al.  The Spectrographic Analysis of Sound Signals of the Domestic Fowl , 1953 .

[22]  H. Scheich,et al.  Different Binaural Inputs Subdividing Isofrequency Planes in Chick Inferior Colliculus: Evidence from 2-Deoxyglucose , 1988 .

[23]  H Scheich,et al.  Auditory imprinting leads to differential 2-deoxyglucose uptake and dendritic spine loss in the chick rostral forebrain. , 1987, Brain research.

[24]  H. Scheich,et al.  2-deoxyglucose accumulation parallels extracellularly recorded spike activity in the avian auditory neostriatum , 1984, Brain Research.

[25]  H. Scheich,et al.  Functional organization of the avian auditory cortex analogue. II. Topographic distribution of latency , 1991, Brain Research.

[26]  Nobuo Suga,et al.  FEATURE EXTRACTION IN THE AUDITORY SYSTEM OF BATS , 1973 .

[27]  E. Rubel,et al.  Organization and development of brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: Tonotopic organization of N. magnocellularis and N. laminaris , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[28]  N Suga,et al.  Analysis of frequency‐modulated and complex sounds by single auditory neurones of bats , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  William Kruskal,et al.  A Nonparametric test for the Several Sample Problem , 1952 .

[30]  H. Scheich,et al.  Coding of narrow-band and wide-band vocalizations in the auditory midbrain nucleus (MLD) of the Guinea Fowl (Numida meleagris) , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[31]  M. Reivich,et al.  THE [14C]DEOXYGLUCOSE METHOD FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF LOCAL CEREBRAL GLUCOSE UTILIZATION: THEORY, PROCEDURE, AND NORMAL VALUES IN THE CONSCIOUS AND ANESTHETIZED ALBINO RAT 1 , 1977, Journal of neurochemistry.

[32]  H. Scheich,et al.  POSTNATAL SHIFT OF TONOTOPIC ORGANIZATION IN THE CHICK AUDITORY CORTEX ANALOGUE , 1992, Neuroreport.

[33]  W. Kruskal,et al.  Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis , 1952 .

[34]  Gerald Langner,et al.  Processing of pure tone and frequency modulated stimuli by units in the avian auditory forebrain , 1989 .

[35]  E. M. Barnes,et al.  Ontogeny of the GABA receptor complex in chick brain: studies in vivo and in vitro. , 1986, Brain research.