Psychiatric diagnosis: the indispensability of ambivalence

The author analyses how debate over the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders has tended to privilege certain conceptions of psychiatric diagnosis over others, as well as to polarise positions regarding psychiatric diagnosis. The article aims to muddy the black and white tenor of many discussions regarding psychiatric diagnosis by moving away from the preoccupation with diagnosis as classification and refocusing attention on diagnosis as a temporally and spatially complex, as well as highly mediated process. The article draws on historical, sociological and first-person perspectives regarding psychiatric diagnosis in order to emphasise the conceptual—and potentially ethical—benefits of ambivalence vis-à-vis the achievements and problems of psychiatric diagnosis.

[1]  N. Crossley.  Contesting Psychiatry: Social Movements in Mental Health , 2006 .

[2]  黄亚明.  MedScape , 2009 .

[3]  R. Hu.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) , 2003 .

[4]  T. Szasz,et al.  The classification of “Mental illness” , 1959, Psychiatric Quarterly.

[5]  K. Greenwood,et al.  Holding blame at bay? ‘Gene talk' in family members' accounts of schizophrenia aetiology , 2012, BioSocieties.

[6]  Michael E. Staub.  Madness Is Civilization: When the Diagnosis Was Social, 1948-1980 , 2011 .

[7]  B. Kelly.  Structural violence and schizophrenia. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[8]  M. Pickersgill.  What is psychiatry? Co-producing complexity in mental health , 2012, Social theory & health : STH.

[9]  G. Szmukler.  When psychiatric diagnosis becomes an overworked tool , 2013, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[10]  M. Pickersgill.  Debating DSM-5: diagnosis and the sociology of critique , 2013, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[11]  Joseph M. Cerimele.  Madness Is Civilization: When the Diagnosis Was Social, 1948–1980 , 2012 .

[12]  M. Blaxter,et al.  Diagnosis as category and process: The case of alcoholism , 1978 .

[13]  R. Silverstone.  Complicity and Collusion in the Mediation of Everyday Life , 2002 .

[14]  G. Thornicroft,et al.  Service user perspectives on the impact of a mental illness diagnosis , 2010, Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale.

[15]  M. Fricker.  FORUM: Miranda FRICKER's Epistemic Injustice. Power and the Ethics of Knowing , 2008, THEORIA.

[16]  R. Lakeman.  Saving normal: an insider’s revolt against out-of-control psychiatric diagnosis, DSM-5, big pharma, and the medicalization of ordinary life , 2014 .

[17]  J. Bard.  The Book of Woe: The DSM and the Unmaking of Psychiatry , 2013 .

[18]  A. David,et al.  Has psychiatric diagnosis labelled rather than enabled patients? , 2013, BMJ.

[19]  C. West,et al.  Dilemmas and Contradictions of Status , 2007 .

[20]  A. Frances.  Saving Normal: An Insider's Revolt Against Out-of-Control Psychiatric Diagnosis, DSM-5, Big Pharma, and the Medicalization of Ordinary Life , 2013 .

[21]  A. Jutel.  Sociology of diagnosis: a preliminary review. , 2009, Sociology of health & illness.

[22]  K. Weisbrode.  On Ambivalence: The Problems and Pleasures of Having it Both Ways , 2012 .

[23]  J. Sadowsky.  Beyond the Metaphor of the Pendulum: Electroconvulsive Therapy, Psychoanalysis, and the Styles of American Psychiatry , 2005, Journal of the history of medicine and allied sciences.

[24]  Nick Couldry,et al.  Mediatization or mediation? Alternative understandings of the emergent space of digital storytelling , 2008, New Media Soc..

[25]  J. Dumit.  Illnesses you have to fight to get: facts as forces in uncertain, emergent illnesses. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[26]  E. Lunbeck.  :Prozac on the Couch: Prescribing Gender in the Era of Wonder Drugs , 2004 .