Grey-box PK/PD modelling of insulin

Grey-box PK/PD modelling is presented as a new and promising way of modelling the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the in vivo system of insulin and glucose and to estimate model and derived PK/PD parameters. The concept behind grey-box modelling consists of using a priori physical knowledge along with information from data in the estimation of model parameters. The grey-box PK/PD modelling principle is applied to two different insulin studies. The PK/PD properties of two types of insulin are investigated in an euglycaemic clamp study where a single bolus of insulin is injection subcutaneously. The effect of insulin on the glucose disappearance is investigated by artificially maintaining a blood glucose concentration close to the normal fasting level. The infused glucose needed to maintain the clamped blood glucose concentration can therefore be used as a measure for the glucose utilization. The PK and PD parameters are successfully estimated simultaneously thereby describing the uptake, distribution, and effect of two different types of insulin. The glucose tolerance tests are used for assessing the glucose tolerance of possible diabetic patients. The intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) is modelled using Bergman's `Minimal Model' from where metabolic indices are estimated and compared for normal glucose tolerant and impaired glucose tolerant subjects. The grey-box estimates of the system noise parameters using CTSM indicate that the minimal model of glucose kinetics is too simple and should preferably be revised. The estimated metabolic indices from the IVGTT are compared with previously published results using MinMod and further compared with those from an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The derived OGTT models are inaccurate and not suitable for predicting the indices from an IVGTT.

[1]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[2]  Nonlinear Compartmental Model Indistinguishability , 1994 .

[3]  Claudio Cobelli,et al.  Models of subcutaneous insulin kinetics. A critical review , 2000, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[4]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  A generalization of some classical time series tools , 2001 .

[5]  George E. P. Box,et al.  Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control , 1977 .

[6]  D. Howey,et al.  Comparative Pharmacokinetics and Glucodynamics of Two Human Insulin Mixtures 70/30 and 50/50 insulin mixtures , 1994, Diabetes Care.

[7]  L Aarons,et al.  Role of modelling and simulation in Phase I drug development. , 2001, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[8]  C Cobelli,et al.  Hepatic glucose production during the labeled IVGTT: estimation by deconvolution with a new minimal model. , 1993, The American journal of physiology.

[9]  Greg Welch,et al.  Welch & Bishop , An Introduction to the Kalman Filter 2 1 The Discrete Kalman Filter In 1960 , 1994 .

[10]  C. Cobelli,et al.  Glucose effectiveness and insulin sensitivity from the minimal models: consequences of undermodeling assessed by Monte Carlo simulation , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  N. Schneiderman,et al.  Validation of the insulin sensitivity index (ISI(0,120)): comparison with other measures. , 2000, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[12]  J. Boissel,et al.  Revisiting the effect compartment through timing errors in drug administration. , 1998, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[13]  R N Bergman,et al.  Reassessment of Glucose Effectiveness and Insulin Sensitivity From Minimal Model Analysis: A Theoretical Evaluation of the Single-Compartment Glucose Distribution Assumption , 1997, Diabetes.

[14]  Y. Z. Ider,et al.  Quantitative estimation of insulin sensitivity. , 1979, The American journal of physiology.

[15]  D. Howey,et al.  Establishment of Time-Action Profiles for Regular and NPH Insulin Using Pharmacodynamic Modeling , 1994, Diabetes Care.

[16]  Keith R. Godfrey,et al.  Structural identifiability of controlled state space systems: a quasiautomated methodology for generating identifiable reparameterisations of unidentifiable systems , 1999 .

[17]  M. Matsuda,et al.  Insulin sensitivity indices obtained from oral glucose tolerance testing: comparison with the euglycemic insulin clamp. , 1999, Diabetes care.

[18]  Lewis B. Sheiner,et al.  Simultaneous modeling of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: Application to d‐tubocurarine , 1979 .

[19]  R. Bergman,et al.  Physiologic evaluation of factors controlling glucose tolerance in man: measurement of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell glucose sensitivity from the response to intravenous glucose. , 1981, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[20]  A. de Leiva,et al.  Assessment of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function from measurements in the fasting state and during an oral glucose tolerance test , 2000, Diabetologia.

[21]  Giovanni Sparacino,et al.  Maximum-likelihood versus maximum a posteriori parameter estimation of physiological system models: the c-peptide impulse response case study , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  Wojciech Krzyzanski,et al.  Indirect Pharmacodynamic Models for Responses with Multicompartmental Distribution or Polyexponential Disposition , 2001, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.

[24]  E. Williams,et al.  Algorithm to control "effect compartment" drug concentrations in pharmacokinetic model-driven drug delivery , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  D R Owens,et al.  Subcutaneous Insulin Absorption Explained by Insulin's Physicochemical Properties: Evidence From Absorption Studies of Soluble Human Insulin and Insulin Analogues in Humans , 1991, Diabetes Care.

[26]  Claudio Cobelli,et al.  Global identifiability of nonlinear models of biological systems , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  J Pérez-Urizar,et al.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling: why? , 2000, Archives of medical research.

[28]  Ovide Arino,et al.  Mathematical modelling of the intravenous glucose tolerance test , 2000, Journal of mathematical biology.

[29]  Gwilym M. Jenkins,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1971 .

[30]  H Derendorf,et al.  Basic concepts of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling. , 1997, International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[31]  S. Silbernagl,et al.  Color atlas of physiology , 1981 .

[32]  Fahima Nekka,et al.  Peripheral Link Model as an Alternative for Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Drugs Having a Very Short Elimination Half-Life , 2001, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.

[33]  A. Mari,et al.  Assessment of insulin sensitivity and secretion with the labelled intravenous glucose tolerance test: improved modelling analysis , 1998, Diabetologia.

[34]  P. Welling,et al.  Pharmacokinetics: Processes and Mathematics , 1986 .

[35]  M. Stumvoll,et al.  Use of the oral glucose tolerance test to assess insulin release and insulin sensitivity. , 2000, Diabetes care.

[36]  Jusko,et al.  Role of dosage regimen in controlling indirect pharmacodynamic responses. , 2001, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[37]  Andrea Mari,et al.  A Model-Based Method for Assessing Insulin Sensitivity From the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test , 2001 .

[38]  L B Sheiner,et al.  Simultaneous modeling of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: application to d-tubocurarine. , 1980, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[39]  S. Altmann Henderson's Dictionary of Biological Terms, Ninth edition, Sandra Holmes. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York (1979), xi, + 510. Price $29.95 , 1981 .