BACKGROUND
A survey of private practice facilities in the United States that perform dental radiography was conducted in 1993 and repeated in dental schools in 1995-1996.
METHODS
Both surveys were conducted as part of the Nationwide Evaluation of X-ray Trends, or NEXT, survey program. A representative sample of dental facilities from each participating state were surveyed, and data on patient radiation exposure, radiographic technique, film-image quality, film-processing quality and darkroom fog were collected.
RESULTS
The authors found that dental schools use E-speed film more frequently than do private practice facilities. The use of E-speed film and better film processing by dental schools resulted in lower patient radiation exposures without sacrificing image quality. The authors also found that dental school darkrooms had lower ambient fog levels than did those of private practice facilities.
CONCLUSIONS
The distribution for the 1993 NEXT survey facilities was greater than that observed for dental schools for radiation exposure, film-processing quality and darkroom fog. Dental schools, in general, had better film quality and lower radiation exposures than did private practice facilities.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS
Facilities need to emphasize better quality processing and the use of E-speed film to reduce patient exposure and improve image quality.
[1]
D. Spelic,et al.
Nationwide survey of fluoroscopy: radiation dose and image quality.
,
1997,
Radiology.
[2]
J. Sciubba,et al.
Certified radiation safety officers program. The Nassau County experience, 1990-1992.
,
1993,
The New York state dental journal.
[3]
O. Suleiman,et al.
The Sensitometric Technique for the Evaluation of Processing (STEP)
,
1993
.
[4]
J. Sciubba,et al.
Dental radiographic exposure normalization program (DENT). The experience in Nassau County, NY.
,
1993,
The New York state dental journal.
[5]
O. Suleiman,et al.
Automatic film processing: analysis of 9 years of observations.
,
1992,
Radiology.
[6]
J. Mccrohan,et al.
Average radiation dose in standard CT examinations of the head: results of the 1990 NEXT survey.
,
1992,
Radiology.
[7]
J. Sciubba,et al.
The role of dental schools in future film selection.
,
1991,
The New York state dental journal.
[8]
O. Suleiman,et al.
Radiographic film fog in the darkroom.
,
1984,
Radiology.
[9]
J. Mccrohan,et al.
The United States Experience in Patient Dose and Image Quality
,
1995
.