Yield Effects of Tissue Culture Bananas in Kenya: Accounting for Selection Bias and the Role of Complementary Inputs

We analyze yield effects of tissue culture (TC) banana technology in the Kenyan small farm sector, using recent survey data and an endogenous switching regression approach. TC banana plantlets, which are free from pests and diseases, have been introduced in East Africa since the late-1990s. While field experiments show significant yield advantages over traditional banana suckers, a rigorous assessment of impacts in farmers' fields is still outstanding. A comparison of mean yield levels between TC adopters and non-adopters in our sample shows no significant difference. However, we find a negative selection bias, indicating that farmers with lower than average yields are more likely to adopt TC. Controlling for this bias results in a positive and significant TC net yield gain of 7%. We also find that TC technology is more knowledgeintensive and more responsive to irrigation than traditional bananas. Simulations show that improving access to irrigation could lift TC productivity gains to above 20%. The analytical approach developed and applied here may also be useful for the evaluation of other knowledgeintensive package technologies and innovations in perennial crops.

[1]  M. Qaim.  Assessing the Impact of Banana Biotechnology in Kenya , 1999 .

[2]  Matin Qaim,et al.  Supermarkets, farm household income, and poverty: Insights from Kenya , 2011 .

[3]  M. Muyanga.  Smallholder adoption and economic impacts of tissue culture banana in Kenya. , 2009 .

[4]  R. Bennett,et al.  Bias from farmer self-selection in genetically modified crop productivity estimates: Evidence from Indian data , 2007 .

[5]  G. S. Maddala,et al.  Disequilibrium, self-selection, and switching models , 1986 .

[6]  P. V. Asten,et al.  Quantifying bunch weights of the East African Highland bananas (Musa spp. AAA-EA) using non-destructive field observations , 2009 .

[7]  K. Eckstein,et al.  A field comparison of conventional suckers with tissue culture banana planting material over three crop cycles , 1993 .

[8]  George E. Battese,et al.  A Note On The Estimation Of Cobb‐Douglas Production Functions When Some Explanatory Variables Have Zero Values , 1997 .

[9]  S. Mbogoh,et al.  SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BIOTECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS: SOME LESSONS FROM THE PILOT TISSUE-CULTURE (TC) BANANA PRODUCTION PROMOTION PROJECT IN KENYA, 1997-2002 , 2003 .

[10]  Michael Lokshin,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Endogenous Switching Regression Models , 2004 .

[11]  M. Morris,et al.  Estimating the benefits of plant breeding research: methodological issues and practical challenges , 2003 .

[12]  M. Smale,et al.  An economic assessment of banana genetic improvement and innovation in the Lake Victoria Region of Uganda and Tanzania , 2007 .

[13]  Hedley Rees,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1985 .

[14]  Darrell J. Bosch,et al.  Economic and Environmental Implications of Soil Nitrogen Testing: A Switching-Regression Analysis , 1995 .

[15]  P. Winters,et al.  Introduction to the Special Feature: Evaluating the Impact of Agricultural Projects in Developing Countries , 2011 .

[16]  G. Kagezi,et al.  The effects of banana weevil, Cosmopolites sordidus, damage on highland banana growth, yield and stand duration in Uganda , 2004 .

[17]  K. Eckstein,et al.  Physiological responses of banana (Musa AAA; Cavendish sub-group) in the subtropics. IV. Comparison between tissue culture and conventional planting material during the first months of development , 1995 .

[18]  P. Winters,et al.  How do Agricultural Programmes Alter Crop Production? Evidence from Ecuador , 2011 .

[19]  Petra E. Todd,et al.  Reconciling Conflicting Evidence on the Performance of Propensity-Score Matching Methods , 2001 .

[20]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[21]  Angus Deaton.  Instruments, Randomization, and Learning about Development , 2010 .

[22]  V. Krishna,et al.  Bt cotton and sustainability of pesticide reductions in India , 2012 .

[23]  M. Qaim,et al.  Seed Market Privatisation and Farmers’ Access to Crop Technologies: The Case of Hybrid Pearl Millet Adoption in India , 2008 .

[24]  S. S. Acharya,et al.  Socio-Economic Impact of Tissue Culture Banana (Musa spp.) in Kenya through the Whole Value Chain Approach , 2010 .

[25]  C. Barrett,et al.  Better Technology, Better Plots, or Better Farmers? Identifying Changes in Productivity and Risk Among Malagasy Rice Farmers , 2004 .

[26]  M. Carr.  THE WATER RELATIONS AND IRRIGATION REQUIREMENTS OF BANANA (MUSA SPP.) , 2009, Experimental Agriculture.

[27]  G. Maddala.  Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics: Introduction , 1983 .

[28]  M. Qaim,et al.  The impact of social networks on hybrid seed adoption in India , 2009 .

[29]  R. Ortiz,et al.  Banana and plantain breeding , 1995 .

[30]  David Zilberman,et al.  Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey , 1985, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[31]  Gunnar Köhlin,et al.  The Economics of Sustainable Land Management Practices in the Ethiopian Highlands , 2010 .

[32]  Olawole O. Obembe,et al.  The plant biotechnology flight: is Africa on board? , 2010 .

[33]  Arega D. Alene,et al.  The effects of education on agricultural productivity under traditional and improved technology in northern Nigeria: an endogenous switching regression analysis , 2007 .

[34]  Jaindra Nath Tripathi,et al.  Rapid and efficient production of transgenic East African Highland Banana (Musa spp.) using intercalary meristematic tissues , 2008 .

[35]  M. Smale,et al.  A trait-based model of the potential demand for a genetically engineered food crop in a developing economy , 2006 .

[36]  A. Fermont,et al.  Drought is a major yield loss factor for rainfed East African highland banana , 2011 .

[37]  Cheryl R. Doss,et al.  Analyzing technology adoption using microstudies: limitations, challenges, and opportunities for improvement , 2006 .

[38]  D. Vuylsteke.  Field Performance of Banana Micropropagules and Somaclones , 1998 .

[39]  R. Tripp.  The Performance of Low External Input Technology in Agricultural Development: A Summary of Three Case Studies , 2005 .

[40]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge.  Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .