Motion-Affected Electrode-Tissue Interface Characterization for Ambulatory EEG Recording

Motion artifacts are arguably the most important issue in the development of wearable ambulatory EEG devices. Designing circuits and systems capable of high-quality EEG recording regardless of these artifacts requires a clear understanding of how the electrode-skin interface is affected by physical motions. In this work, first, we report statistically-significant experimental characterization results of electrodeskin interface impedance for dry contact and non-contact electrodes in the presence of various motions. This leads to a model describing the motion-induced electrode-skin interface impedance variations for these electrodes. Next, a critical review of the possible analog front-end circuits for surface EEG recording is presented, followed by theoretical circuit analysis discussing the effect of electrode movements on the operation of these circuits. Inspired by the developed model and the analytical review, a novel front-end architecture capable of extracting motion from the EEG signal during the amplification stage is presented and experimentally characterized.

[1]  Roman Genov,et al.  Rail-to-Rail-Input Dual-Radio 64-Channel Closed-Loop Neurostimulator , 2017, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[2]  Roman Genov,et al.  Battery-less modular responsive neurostimulator for prediction and abortion of epileptic seizures , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS).

[3]  Reid R. Harrison,et al.  A low-power, low-noise CMOS amplifier for neural recording applications , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems. Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37353).

[4]  Roman Genov,et al.  27.3 All-wireless 64-channel 0.013mm2/ch closed-loop neurostimulator with rail-to-rail DC offset removal , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC).

[5]  Karim Abdelhalim,et al.  Battery-less Tri-band-Radio Neuro-monitor and Responsive Neurostimulator for Diagnostics and Treatment of Neurological Disorders , 2016, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[6]  Gert Cauwenberghs,et al.  Ultra-High Input Impedance, Low Noise Integrated Amplifier for Noncontact Biopotential Sensing , 2011, IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems.

[7]  Hossein Kassiri,et al.  A 9.2-g Fully-Flexible Wireless Ambulatory EEG Monitoring and Diagnostics Headband With Analog Motion Artifact Detection and Compensation , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[8]  Refet Firat Yazicioglu,et al.  A 160 $\mu{\rm A}$ Biopotential Acquisition IC With Fully Integrated IA and Motion Artifact Suppression , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[9]  Roman Genov,et al.  Artifact-Tolerant Opamp-Less Delta-Modulated Bidirectional Neuro-Interface , 2018, 2018 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Circuits.

[10]  Refet Firat Yazicioglu,et al.  A 160μA biopotential acquisition ASIC with fully integrated IA and motion-artifact suppression , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference.

[11]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  A Practical Mobile Dry EEG System for Human Computer Interfaces , 2013, HCI.

[12]  Chia-Hung Liu,et al.  An interdigitated non-contact ECG electrode for impedance compensation and signal restoration , 2015, 2015 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS).

[13]  Refet Firat Yazicioglu,et al.  A Wearable 8-Channel Active-Electrode EEG/ETI Acquisition System for Body Area Networks , 2014, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[14]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  Dry-Contact and Noncontact Biopotential Electrodes: Methodological Review , 2010, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Rosalind W. Picard,et al.  Non-contact, automated cardiac pulse measurements using video imaging and blind source separation , 2022 .