Coelomata and not Ecdysozoa: evidence from genome-wide phylogenetic analysis.

Relative positions of nematodes, arthropods, and chordates in animal phylogeny remain uncertain. The traditional tree topology joins arthropods with chordates in a coelomate clade, whereas nematodes, which lack a coelome, occupy a basal position. However, the current leading hypothesis, based on phylogenetic trees for 18S ribosomal RNA and several proteins, joins nematodes with arthropods in a clade of molting animals, Ecdysozoa. We performed a phylogenetic analysis of over 500 sets of orthologous proteins, which are represented in plants, animals, and fungi, using maximum likelihood, maximum parsimony, and distance methods. Additionally, to increase the statistical power of topology tests, the same methods were applied to concatenated alignments of subunits of eight conserved macromolecular complexes. The majority of the methods, when applied to most of the orthologous clusters, both concatenated and individual, grouped the fly with humans to the exclusion of the nematode, in support of the coelomate phylogeny. Trees were also constructed using information on insertions and deletions in orthologous proteins, combinations of domains in multidomain proteins, and presence-absence of species in clusters of orthologs. All of these approaches supported the coelomate clade and showed concordance between evolution of protein sequences and higher-level evolutionary events, such as domain fusion or gene loss.

[1]  H. Kishino,et al.  Maximum likelihood inference of protein phylogeny and the origin of chloroplasts , 1990, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[2]  Michael P. Cummings,et al.  PAUP* [Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods)] , 2004 .

[3]  Darren A. Natale,et al.  The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes , 2003, BMC Bioinformatics.

[4]  Sudhir Kumar,et al.  Taxon sampling, bioinformatics, and phylogenomics. , 2003, Systematic biology.

[5]  Derrick J. Zwickl,et al.  Is sparse taxon sampling a problem for phylogenetic inference? , 2003, Systematic biology.

[6]  John B. Anderson,et al.  CDD: a curated Entrez database of conserved domain alignments , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[7]  Michael Y. Galperin,et al.  Algorithms for computing parsimonious evolutionary scenarios for genome evolution, the last universal common ancestor and dominance of horizontal gene transfer in the evolution of prokaryotes , 2003, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[8]  S. Blair Hedges,et al.  The origin and evolution of model organisms , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[9]  N. Grishin,et al.  Genome trees and the tree of life. , 2002, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[10]  Hervé Philippe,et al.  The potential value of indels as phylogenetic markers: position of trichomonads as a case study. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[11]  T. Gojobori,et al.  Bmc Evolutionary Biology the Evolutionary Position of Nematodes , 2022 .

[12]  J. Mallatt,et al.  Testing the new animal phylogeny: first use of combined large-subunit and small-subunit rRNA gene sequences to classify the protostomes. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[13]  Martin Vingron,et al.  TREE-PUZZLE: maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis using quartets and parallel computing , 2002, Bioinform..

[14]  K. Strimmer,et al.  Inferring confidence sets of possibly misspecified gene trees , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  B. Snel,et al.  Genomes in flux: the evolution of archaeal and proteobacterial gene content. , 2002, Genome research.

[16]  Masami Hasegawa,et al.  CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection , 2001, Bioinform..

[17]  J. W. Valentine,et al.  Defining phyla: evolutionary pathways to metazoan body plans , 2001, Evolution & development.

[18]  N. Grishin,et al.  Genome trees constructed using five different approaches suggest new major bacterial clades , 2001, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[19]  Sudhir Kumar,et al.  Incomplete taxon sampling is not a problem for phylogenetic inference , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  K. Peterson,et al.  Animal phylogeny and the ancestry of bilaterians: inferences from morphology and 18S rDNA gene sequences , 2001, Evolution & development.

[21]  J. V. Moran,et al.  Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. , 2001, Nature.

[22]  Ard,et al.  Triploblastic Relationships with Emphasis on the Acoelomates and the Position of Gnathostomulida, Cycliophora, Plathelminthes, and Chaetognatha: A Combined Approach of 18S rDNA Sequences and Morphology , 2001 .

[23]  International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome , 2001, Nature.

[24]  P. Holland,et al.  Rare genomic changes as a tool for phylogenetics. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  M. Manuel,et al.  The Comparison of β-Thymosin Homologues Among Metazoa Supports an Arthropod-Nematode Clade , 2000, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[26]  D. Higgins,et al.  T-Coffee: A novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  W. Wheeler,et al.  Triploblastic relationships with emphasis on the acoelomates and the position of Gnathostomulida, Cycliophora, Plathelminthes, and Chaetognatha: a combined approach of 18S rDNA sequences and morphology. , 2000, Systematic biology.

[28]  N. Grishin,et al.  From complete genomes to measures of substitution rate variability within and between proteins. , 2000, Genome research.

[29]  E. Koonin,et al.  The Impact of Comparative Genomics on Our Understanding of Evolution , 2000, Cell.

[30]  J. C. Regier,et al.  More taxa or more characters revisited: combining data from nuclear protein-encoding genes for phylogenetic analyses of Noctuoidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera). , 2000, Systematic biology.

[31]  J. W. Valentine,et al.  The significance of moulting in Ecdysozoan evolution , 2000, Evolution & development.

[32]  N. Lartillot,et al.  The new animal phylogeny: reliability and implications. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  M. P. Cummings,et al.  PAUP* Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods) Version 4 , 2000 .

[34]  S. Fitz-Gibbon,et al.  Whole genome-based phylogenetic analysis of free-living microorganisms. , 1999, Nucleic acids research.

[35]  Sean B. Carroll,et al.  Hox genes in brachiopods and priapulids and protostome evolution , 1999, Nature.

[36]  B. Snel,et al.  Genome phylogeny based on gene content , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[37]  Leo X. Liu,et al.  Large-scale taxonomic profiling of eukaryotic model organisms: a comparison of orthologous proteins encoded by the human, fly, nematode, and yeast genomes. , 1998, Genome research.

[38]  D. Hillis,et al.  Taxonomic sampling, phylogenetic accuracy, and investigator bias. , 1998, Systematic biology.

[39]  Ziheng Yang,et al.  PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood , 1997, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[40]  Thomas L. Madden,et al.  Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[41]  Andrew Rambaut,et al.  Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees , 1997, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[42]  R. Raff,et al.  Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals , 1997, Nature.

[43]  Jun Adachi,et al.  PSeq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of protein sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees , 1997, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[44]  Simon Conway Morris,et al.  The shape of life, genes, development, and the evolution of animal form , 1996 .

[45]  J. Felsenstein Inferring phylogenies from protein sequences by parsimony, distance, and likelihood methods. , 1996, Methods in enzymology.

[46]  N. Saitou,et al.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. , 1987, Molecular biology and evolution.

[47]  W. Fitch,et al.  Construction of phylogenetic trees. , 1967, Science.