Gender Differences in the Self-Assessment of Accuracy on Cognitive Tasks

Generally, self-assessment of accuracy in the cognitive domain produces overconfidence, whereas self-assessment of the accuracy of visual perceptual judgments produces underconfidence. The possible effect of gender differences on these robust findings appears to be underinvestigated. In this paper, I report two studies that take a step toward redressing this shortcoming. In Study 1, a group of young adults (N =185) were presented with a test of General Knowledge and a visual perceptual task. The results indicated the typical over/underconfidence phenomena noted above, but, when analyzed by sex, indicated statistically significant differences; men were more confident than women on both tasks. In Study 2, participants (N =303) with a wider age range completed 4 tests of cognitive ability, which were drawn from the theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence. Results indicated that the tendency for men to express higher levels of confidence than women in the accuracy of their work appears to remain constant across the life-span. These findings are discussed in relation to self-concept and gender stereotyping.

[1]  H. Gardner,et al.  Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences , 1983 .

[2]  P. Juslin.  The Overconfidence Phenomenon as a Consequence of Informal Experimenter-Guided Selection of Almanac Items , 1994 .

[3]  L. Robertson,et al.  For and against , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  J. M. Cattell,et al.  On the Perception of Small Differences , 1894 .

[5]  Catherine Good,et al.  When White Men Can't Do Math: Necessary and Sufficient Factors in Stereotype Threat , 1999 .

[6]  Beatrice Rammstedt,et al.  Sex differences in self-estimates of different aspects of intelligence , 2000 .

[7]  Diane F. Halpern,et al.  The Smarter Sex: A Critical Review of Sex Differences in Intelligence , 2000 .

[8]  K. Thompson.  Cognitive and Analytical Psychology Howard Gardner .Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York, Basic Books, 1983. , 1985 .

[9]  D. C. Howell.  Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[10]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  Assessing metacognitive awareness , 1994 .

[11]  G. Gigerenzer,et al.  Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidence. , 1991, Psychological review.

[12]  Lazar Stankov,et al.  Calibration curves, scatterplots and the distinction between general knowledge and perceptual tasks , 1998 .

[13]  C. Spearman,et al.  "THE ABILITIES OF MAN". , 1928, Science.

[14]  J V Baranski,et al.  Realism of confidence in sensory discrimination , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  The Effect of Metacognitive Knowledge on Local and Global Monitoring , 1994 .

[16]  Claude M. Steele,et al.  Stereotyping and its threat are real. , 1998 .

[17]  Alexander Seeshing Yeung,et al.  Longitudinal Structural Equation Models of Academic Self-Concept and Achievement: Gender Differences in the Development of Math and English Constructs , 1998 .

[18]  N. J. Mackintosh,et al.  IQ and human intelligence , 1998 .

[19]  J. Elshout.  Human cognitive abilities. A survey of factoranalytic studies: John B. Carroll, Cambridge University Press, 1993. Pp. 819. ISBN-0-521-38712-4 paperback , 1995 .

[20]  A. Tversky,et al.  The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  P. Juslin,et al.  Realism of confidence in sensory discrimination: The underconfidence phenomenon , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  A. Kaufman,et al.  Age changes on tests of fluid and crystallized ability for women and men on the Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test (KAIT) at ages 17-94 years. , 1996 .

[23]  Lazar Stankov,et al.  The Basic Information Processing (BIP) unit, mental speed and human cognitive abilities: Should the BIP R.I.P? , 1996 .

[24]  L. Stankov,et al.  Biological versus psychometric intelligence: Halstead's (1947) distinction revisited. , 2000, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[25]  Anders Winman,et al.  Calibration of sensory and cognitive judgments : Two different accounts , 1993 .

[26]  Richard D. Roberts,et al.  Charting the Cognitive Sphere: Tactile-Kinesthetic Performance within the Structure of Intelligence. , 1997 .

[27]  D. O. Hebb,et al.  The effect of early and late brain injury upon test scores, and the nature of adult intelligence. , 1942 .

[28]  R. Cattell,et al.  Higher-stratum ability structures on a basis of twenty primary abilities. , 1978 .

[29]  Lazar Stankov,et al.  Complexity, Metacognition, and Fluid Intelligence , 2000 .

[30]  C. Steele.  A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[31]  Lazar Stankov,et al.  Age differences in the realism of confidence judgements: A calibration study using tests of fluid and crystallized intelligence , 1996 .

[32]  Nigel Harvey,et al.  Confidence in judgment , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  Sabina Kleitman,et al.  Ecological and person-oriented aspects of metacognitive processes in test-taking. , 2001 .

[34]  Ian Deary.  g and cognitive 'elements' of information processing: an agnostic view. , 2002 .

[35]  A. H. Murphy.  A New Vector Partition of the Probability Score , 1973 .

[36]  G R Marsh,et al.  Prediction and evaluation of memory performance by young and old adults. , 1985, Journal of gerontology.

[37]  H. Olsson,et al.  Underconfidence in sensory discrimination: The interaction between experimental setting and response strategies , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  Richard D. Roberts,et al.  What the nose knows: olfaction and cognitive abilities , 2001 .

[39]  J. Carroll.  Human Cognitive Abilities-a sur-vey of factor-analytic studies , 1993 .

[40]  A. Jensen,et al.  Psychometric g: Definition and substantiation. , 2002 .

[41]  Phillip L. Ackerman,et al.  What we really know about our abilities and our knowledge , 2002 .

[42]  Sabina Kleitman,et al.  The Role of Individual Differences in the Accuracy of Confidence Judgments , 2002, The Journal of general psychology.

[43]  L. Gottfredson.  G: Highly general and highly practical , 2002 .

[44]  R. Cattell.  The measurement of adult intelligence. , 1943 .

[45]  Gregory Schraw.  The Effect of Generalized Metacognitive Knowledge on Test Performance and Confidence Judgments , 1996 .

[46]  L. Stankov,et al.  Metacognitive Aspects of Test-Taking and Intelligence , 2000 .

[47]  Testing models of decision making using confidence ratings in classification. , 1996 .

[48]  L. Stankov,et al.  Confidence judgments in studies of individual differences , 1996 .

[49]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[50]  Raymond J. Shaw,et al.  Age differences in predictions and performance on a cued recall task. , 1989, Psychology and aging.

[51]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  Test difficulty and judgment bias , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[52]  P. Juslin.  An explanation of the hard-easy effect in studies of realism of confidence in one's general knowledge , 1993 .

[53]  Lazar Stankov,et al.  Mining on the "no man's land" between intelligence and personality. , 1999 .

[54]  L. Stankov,et al.  Self-confidence and performance on tests of cognitive abilities , 1997 .

[55]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  A multidimensional, hierarchical model of self-concept: Theoretical and empirical justification , 1990 .

[56]  John L. Horn,et al.  Human Abilities Revealed Through Auditory Tests , 1980 .

[57]  G. Brier.  VERIFICATION OF FORECASTS EXPRESSED IN TERMS OF PROBABILITY , 1950 .

[58]  D Kahneman,et al.  On the reality of cognitive illusions. , 1996, Psychological review.

[59]  Adrian Furnham,et al.  Gender Differences in Measured and Self-Estimated Trait Emotional Intelligence , 2000 .

[60]  L. Hedges,et al.  Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. , 1995, Science.

[61]  S. Spencer,et al.  Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance , 1999 .