The new ecological paradigm revisited: anchoring the NEP scale in environmental ethics

The New Environmental or Ecological Paradigm (NEP) is widely acknowledged as a reliable multiple‐item scale to capture environmental attitudes or beliefs. It has been used in statistical analyses for almost 30 years, primarily by psychologists, but also by political scientists, sociologists and geographers. The scale's theoretical foundation is, however, seldom discussed and not comprehensively specified. This article explores the environmental ethics that underlies the scale, analysing which ethical positions on human—nature relations the scale seem to match. The study shows that pronounced forms of anthropocentrism are well captured by the scale, while the environmental position is ‘shallow’ rather than ‘deep green’ and misses crucial elements of the contemporary environmental ethics debate.

[1]  S. Oskamp,et al.  Effort as a Moderator of the Attitude-Behavior Relationship: General Environmental Concern and Recycling , 1996 .

[2]  D. Schlosberg.  Environmental justice and the new pluralism : the challenge of difference for environmentalism , 1999 .

[3]  D. Meadows,et al.  The limits to growth. A report for the Club of Rome's project on the predicament of mankind. , 1972 .

[4]  R. Dunlap.  Sociological and Social-Psychological Perspectives on Environmental Issues: A Bibliography. , 1975 .

[5]  F. Noe,et al.  The new environmental paradigm and further scale analysis. , 1990 .

[6]  T. L. Scheid-Cook,et al.  A Sand County Almanac , 1949 .

[7]  R. Eckersley.  Liberal democracy and the rights of nature: The struggle for inclusion , 1995 .

[8]  A. Vincent.  Modern political ideologies , 1992 .

[9]  Andrew Jamison.  Miljö som politik , 2003 .

[10]  Örjan Wiidegren,et al.  The New Environmental Paradigm and Personal Norms , 1998 .

[11]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale , 2000 .

[12]  J. Seed.  The Ecological Self , 2006 .

[13]  G. Varner.  The Animal Rights/Environmental Ethics Debate: The Environmental Perspective , 1993 .

[14]  David Rothenberg,et al.  Is It Painful to Think , 1992 .

[15]  P. Stern.  New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior , 2000 .

[16]  Bill Devall.  Living richly in an age of limits , 1993 .

[17]  Barbara MacKinnon,et al.  "Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals," by Peter Singer , 1977 .

[18]  Geoffrey Gooch,et al.  Environmental Beliefs and Attitudes in Sweden and the Baltic States , 1995 .

[19]  D. Meadows,et al.  The Limits to Growth , 2018, Green Planet Blues.

[20]  David Rothenberg,et al.  Ecology, Community and Lifestyle: Outline of an Ecosophy , 1989 .

[21]  R. Goodin.  Enfranchising the Earth, and its Alternatives , 1996 .

[22]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Values, Beliefs, and Proenvironmental Action: Attitude Formation Toward Emergent Attitude Objects1 , 1995 .

[23]  E. L. Jackson,et al.  The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: Has It Outlived Its Usefulness? , 2002 .

[24]  M. Douglas,et al.  Risk and Culture , 1983 .

[25]  R. Dunlap,et al.  A New Ecological Paradigm for Post-Exuberant Sociology , 1980 .

[26]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Ark II; social response to environmental imperatives , 1973 .

[27]  Don E. Albrecht,et al.  The New Environmental Paradigm Scale. , 1982 .

[28]  M. Oelschlaeger.  The wilderness condition : essays on environment and civilization , 1992 .

[29]  Suzanne C. Thompson,et al.  Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment , 1994 .

[30]  A. Dobson.  Justice and the Environment: Conceptions of Environmental Sustainability and Theories of Distributive Justice , 1998 .

[31]  Andrew Dobson,et al.  Justice and the environment , 1998 .

[32]  Eco-democracy : a green challenge to democratic theory and practice , 1998 .

[33]  Jack M. Geller,et al.  The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: A Reexamination , 1985 .

[34]  Arne Naess,et al.  The shallow and the deep, long‐range ecology movement. A summary∗ , 1973 .

[35]  R. Dunlap,et al.  The “New Environmental Paradigm” , 1978 .

[36]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , 1963 .

[37]  J. B. Callicott,et al.  The Case for Animal Rights , 2023, The Personalist Forum.

[38]  David Rothenberg,et al.  Is It Painful to Think? Conversations with Arne Naess, David Rothenberg. 1993. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN. 204 pages. ISBN: 0-8166-2152-7. $NA , 1994 .

[39]  Paul W. Taylor,et al.  The Ethics of Respect for Nature , 1981 .

[40]  Soeryo Adiwibowo,et al.  Politics and the Environment - From Theory to Practice , 2012 .

[41]  David Schlosberg,et al.  Environmental Justice and the New Pluralism , 1999 .

[42]  Bill Devall,et al.  Deep Ecology: Living as if Nature Mattered , 1985 .

[43]  Andrew Dobson,et al.  Citizenship and the environment , 2003 .

[44]  J. Barry,et al.  Sustaining Liberal Democracy: Ecological Challenges and Opportunities , 2001 .

[45]  W. Ophuls.  Ecology and the politics of scarcity , 1977 .

[46]  Fox,et al.  Toward a Transpersonal Ecology: Developing New Foundations for Environmentalism , 1990 .

[47]  R. Dunlap,et al.  THE NEW ENVIRONMENTAL PARADIGM: 5 PROPOSED MEASURING INSTRUMENT AND PRELIMINARY RESULTS , 1978 .

[48]  Russell H. Weigel,et al.  Environmental Concern , 1978 .

[49]  R. Eckersley,et al.  Environmentalism And Political Theory: Toward An Ecocentric Approach , 1992 .