In vitro electromagnetically stimulated SAOS-2 osteoblasts inside porous hydroxyapatite.

One of the key challenges in reconstructive bone surgery is to provide living constructs that possess the ability to integrate in the surrounding tissue. Bone graft substitutes, such as autografts, allografts, xenografts, and biomaterials have been widely used to heal critical-size long bone defects due to trauma, tumor resection, congenital deformity, and tissue degeneration. In particular, porous hydroxyapatite is widely used in reconstructive bone surgery owing to its biocompatibility. In addition, the in vitro modification of hydroxyapatite with osteogenic signals enhances the tissue regeneration in vivo, suggesting that the biomaterial modification could play an important role in tissue engineering. In this study we have followed a biomimetic strategy where electromagnetically stimulated SAOS-2 human osteoblasts proliferated and built their extracellular matrix inside a porous hydroxyapatite scaffold. The electromagnetic stimulus had the following parameters: intensity of the magnetic field equal to 2 mT, amplitude of the induced electric tension equal to 5 mV, frequency of 75 Hz, and pulse duration of 1.3 ms. In comparison with control conditions, the electromagnetic stimulus increased the cell proliferation and the surface coating with bone proteins (decorin, osteocalcin, osteopontin, type-I collagen, and type-III collagen). The physical stimulus aimed at obtaining a better modification of the biomaterial internal surface in terms of cell colonization and coating with bone matrix.

[1]  S. Evanko,et al.  Proteoglycans of fetal bovine tendon. , 1987, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[2]  P. Botti,et al.  Pulsed magnetic fields improve osteoblast activity during the repair of an experimental osseous defect , 1993, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[3]  R. Cohen,et al.  Phenotypic characterization of mononuclear cells following anorganic bovine bone implantation in rats. , 1994, Journal of periodontology.

[4]  M. Young,et al.  Antisera and cDNA probes to human and certain animal model bone matrix noncollagenous proteins. , 1995, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[5]  E. Monzani,et al.  Type I collagen CNBr peptides: species and behavior in solution. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[6]  C T Laurencin,et al.  Three-dimensional degradable porous polymer-ceramic matrices for use in bone repair. , 1996, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[7]  S. Lynch,et al.  Anorganic bovine bone supports osteoblastic cell attachment and proliferation. , 1999, Journal of periodontology.

[8]  H. Tal,et al.  Efficacy of porous bovine bone mineral in various types of osseous deficiencies: clinical observations and literature review. , 2001, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[9]  C T Laurencin,et al.  Bone tissue engineering in a rotating bioreactor using a microcarrier matrix system. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[10]  Sylwester Gogolewski,et al.  Biodegradable polyurethanes for implants. II. In vitro degradation and calcification of materials from poly(epsilon-caprolactone)-poly(ethylene oxide) diols and various chain extenders. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[11]  D. Castner,et al.  Biomedical surface science: Foundations to frontiers , 2002 .

[12]  Sylwester Gogolewski,et al.  Preparation, degradation, and calcification of biodegradable polyurethane foams for bone graft substitutes. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[13]  D. Burr,et al.  A Model for mechanotransduction in bone cells: The load‐bearing mechanosomes , 2003, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[14]  Hideki Yoshikawa,et al.  Capillary vessel network integration by inserting a vascular pedicle enhances bone formation in tissue-engineered bone using interconnected porous hydroxyapatite ceramics. , 2004, Tissue engineering.

[15]  F. P. Magee,et al.  Combined magnetic fields increased net calcium flux in bone cells , 1994, Calcified Tissue International.

[16]  H. Ohgushi,et al.  Bone Tissue Engineering Using Novel Interconnected Porous Hydroxyapatite Ceramics Combined with Marrow Mesenchymal Cells: Quantitative and Three-Dimensional Image Analysis , 2004, Cell transplantation.

[17]  G. Vunjak‐Novakovic,et al.  Osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells on partially demineralized bone scaffolds in vitro. , 2004, Tissue engineering.

[18]  L. Fassina,et al.  Calcified matrix production by SAOS-2 cells inside a polyurethane porous scaffold, using a perfusion bioreactor. , 2005, Tissue engineering.

[19]  M. Heliotis,et al.  Soluble and insoluble signals and the induction of bone formation: molecular therapeutics recapitulating development , 2006, Journal of anatomy.

[20]  Walter H. Chang,et al.  Comparison of ultrasound and electromagnetic field effects on osteoblast growth. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[21]  L. Fassina,et al.  Effects of electromagnetic stimulation on calcified matrix production by SAOS-2 cells over a polyurethane porous scaffold. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[22]  L. Fassina,et al.  Surface modification of a porous polyurethane through a culture of human osteoblasts and an electromagnetic bioreactor. , 2007, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.