BUILDING THE CLIMATE CHANGE REGIME SURVEY AND ANALYSIS OF APPROACHES

The international community is at a crossroads. Negotiators at COP-16 agreed on many issues that are key to moving the international climate regime forward. Nonetheless, there a number of critical issues facing negotiators, at COP-17 and beyond, to realize the UNFCCC‘s long-term global goal of achieving ―stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system‖.

[1]  David G. Victor,et al.  Global Warming Gridlock: Creating More Effective Strategies for Protecting the Planet , 2011 .

[2]  M. Kimble,et al.  MRV under the UN climate regime: paper tiger or catalyst for continual improvement? , 2011 .

[3]  Stephen M. Gardiner,et al.  Climate Ethics: Essential Readings , 2010 .

[4]  A. Mattoo,et al.  Equity in Climate Change: An Analytical Review , 2010 .

[5]  J. Werksman.  Legal symmetry and legal differentiation under a future deal on climate , 2010 .

[6]  H. Winkler,et al.  Fair and effective multilateralism in the post-Copenhagen climate negotiations , 2010 .

[7]  Shyam Saran.  Irresistible forces and immovable objects: a debate on contemporary climate politics , 2010 .

[8]  Stephen O. Andersen,et al.  Reducing abrupt climate change risk using the Montreal Protocol and other regulatory actions to complement cuts in CO2 emissions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  P. Baer,et al.  The Greenhouse Development Rights Framework: Drawing Attention to Inequality within Nations in the Global Climate Policy Debate , 2009 .

[10]  J. Château,et al.  National and Sectoral GHG Mitigation Potential: A Comparison Across Models , 2009 .

[11]  P. Pattberg,et al.  The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures: A Framework for Analysis , 2009, Global Environmental Politics.

[12]  Hadi Dowlatabadi,et al.  A black-carbon mitigation wedge , 2009 .

[13]  R. Leinfelder,et al.  Solving the Climate Dilemma: The Budget Approach (Special Report 2009) , 2009 .

[14]  K. Austin,et al.  Forests in the balance sheet: Lessons from developed country land use change and forestry greenhouse gas accounting & reporting , 2008 .

[15]  Peter M. Haas,et al.  Climate Change Governance after Bali , 2008, Global Environmental Politics.

[16]  Ruth S. DeFries,et al.  Earth observations for estimating greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation in developing countries , 2007 .

[17]  D. Bodansky.  International Sectoral Agreements in a Post-2012 Climate Framework , 2007 .

[18]  J. Fuglestvedt,et al.  Climate agreements based on responsibility for global warming: Periodic updating, policy choices, and regional costs , 2006 .

[19]  Christopher Wood,et al.  Public participation in environmental impact assessment—implementing the Aarhus Convention , 2005 .

[20]  Barbara K. Buchner,et al.  Economic and Environmental Effectiveness of a Technology-Based Protocol , 2004 .

[21]  B. O’Neill,et al.  Dangerous Climate Impacts and the Kyoto Protocol , 2002, Science.

[22]  W. Walker.  The new sovereignty: compliance with international regulatory agreements , 1997 .

[23]  S. Barrett.  Self-enforcing international environmental agreements , 1994 .

[24]  C. Schwarte,et al.  International Climate Change Litigation and the Negotiation Process , 2011 .

[25]  Hans Joachim Schellnhuber,et al.  World in transition: a social contract for sustainability , 2011 .

[26]  Paul Bou-Habib.  Climate Change, Justice and Future Generations , 2010 .

[27]  G. Dutt.  A climate agreement beyond 2012. , 2009 .

[28]  B. Cashore,et al.  Can Non-State Certification Systems Bolster State-Centered Efforts to Promote Sustainable Development through the Clean Development Mechanism , 2009 .

[29]  Matthew Riddle,et al.  Cap and Dividend: How to Curb Global Warming While Protecting the Incomes Of American Families , 2007 .