Vineyard pruning weight assessment by machine vision: towards an on-the-go measurement system

Aim: Pruning weight is an indicator of vegetative growth and vigour in grapevine. Traditionally, it is manually determined, which is time-consuming and labour-demanding. This study aims at providing a new, non-invasive and low-cost method for pruning weight estimation in commercial vineyards based on computer vision.Methods and results: The methodology relies on computer-based analysis of RGB images captured manually and on-the-go in a VSP Tempranillo vineyard. Firstly, the pruning weight estimation was evaluated using manually taken photographs using a controlled background. These images were analysed to generate a model of wood pruning weight estimation, resulting in a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.91 (p<0.001) and a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 87.7 g. After this, a mobile sensor platform (modified ATV) was used to take vine images automatically and on-the-go without background. These RGB images were analysed using a fully automated computer vision algorithm, resulting in R2 = 0.75 (p<0.001) and RMSE = 147.9 g. Finally, the mobile sensor platform was also used to sample a commercial VSP vineyard to map the spatial variability of wood pruning weight, and hereafter vine vigour.Conclusions: The results showed that the developed computer vision methodology was able to estimate the vine pruning weight in commercial vineyards and to map the spatial variation of the pruning weight across a vineyard.Significance and impact of the study: The presented methodology may become a valuable tool for the wine industry for rapid assessment and mapping of vine vigour. This information can be used to support decision making on pruning, fertilization and canopy management.

[1]  Christos D. Tsadilas,et al.  Relation of Ground-Sensor Canopy Reflectance to Biomass Production and Grape Color in Two Merlot Vineyards , 2006 .

[2]  R. White.  Understanding Vineyard Soils , 2009 .

[3]  H. Medrano,et al.  Validation of thermal indices for water status identification in grapevine , 2014 .

[4]  D. Cozzolino,et al.  Non-destructive measurement of grapevine water potential using near infrared spectroscopy , 2011 .

[5]  Márkus Keller.  The Science of Grapevines: Anatomy and Physiology , 2010 .

[6]  Nuria Aleixos,et al.  Assessment of cluster yield components by image analysis. , 2015, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.

[7]  Heiner Kuhlmann,et al.  Towards Automated Large-Scale 3D Phenotyping of Vineyards under Field Conditions , 2016, Sensors.

[8]  Matthew Bardeen,et al.  Selecting Canopy Zones and Thresholding Approaches to Assess Grapevine Water Status by Using Aerial and Ground-Based Thermal Imaging , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[9]  Susan L. Ustin,et al.  Grapevine dormant pruning weight prediction using remotely sensed data , 2003 .

[10]  J. Tardaguila,et al.  Assessment of the spatial variability of anthocyanins in grapes using a fluorescence sensor: relationships with vine vigour and yield , 2012, Precision Agriculture.

[11]  Santiago Velasco-Forero,et al.  On-the-Go Grapevine Yield Estimation Using Image Analysis and Boolean Model , 2018, J. Sensors.

[12]  Tomàs Pallejà,et al.  Real time canopy density validation using ultrasonic envelope signals and point quadrat analysis , 2017, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[13]  Steven Mills,et al.  Finding a vine's structure by bottom-up parsing of cane edges , 2013, 2013 28th International Conference on Image and Vision Computing New Zealand (IVCNZ 2013).

[14]  Ribana Roscher,et al.  BAT (Berry Analysis Tool): A high-throughput image interpretation tool to acquire the number, diameter, and volume of grapevine berries , 2013 .

[15]  P. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT B: STRUCTURAL AND COHESION POLICIES AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT PRECISION AGRICULTURE: AN OPPORTUNITY FOR EU FARMERS-POTENTIAL SUPPORT WITH THE CAP 2014-2020 , 2014 .

[16]  Daniel Cremers,et al.  Field phenotyping of grapevine growth using dense stereo reconstruction , 2015, BMC Bioinformatics.

[17]  Fernand Meyer,et al.  Topographic distance and watershed lines , 1994, Signal Process..

[18]  Supreeth Achar,et al.  A Camera and Laser System for Automatic Vine Balance Assessment , 2011 .

[19]  Tien-Fu Lu,et al.  Image Processing and Analysis for Autonomous Grapevine Pruning , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation.

[20]  Sanjiv Singh,et al.  Visual Yield Estimation in Vineyards: Experiments with Different Varietals and Calibration Procedures , 2011 .

[21]  R. E. Smart,et al.  Sunlight into wine: a handbook for winegrape canopy management. , 1991 .

[22]  Stefano Poni,et al.  MECS-VINE®: A New Proximal Sensor for Segmented Mapping of Vigor and Yield Parameters on Vineyard Rows , 2016, Sensors.

[23]  Scarlett Liu,et al.  A computer vision system for early stage grape yield estimation based on shoot detection , 2017, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[24]  R. D. Tillett,et al.  Image Analysis for Pruning of Long Wood Grape Vines , 1997 .

[25]  María-Paz Diago,et al.  Automated early yield prediction in vineyards from on-the-go image acquisition , 2018, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[26]  Samuel Williams,et al.  A Robot System for Pruning Grape Vines , 2017, J. Field Robotics.

[27]  Paul R. Petrie,et al.  A robust automated flower estimation system for grape vines , 2018, Biosystems Engineering.

[28]  Javier Tardáguila,et al.  Assessment of Vineyard Canopy Porosity Using Machine Vision , 2016, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[29]  Pierre Soille,et al.  Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications , 2003 .

[30]  Saiful Islam,et al.  Mahalanobis Distance , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[31]  Daniel Cremers,et al.  Automatic image‐based determination of pruning mass as a determinant for yield potential in grapevine management and breeding , 2017 .

[32]  Heiner Kuhlmann,et al.  An Automated Field Phenotyping Pipeline for Application in Grapevine Research , 2015, Sensors.

[33]  Alessandro Matese,et al.  Technology in precision viticulture: a state of the art review , 2015 .

[34]  A. Aquino,et al.  Image analysis-based modelling for flower number estimation in grapevine. , 2017, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.

[35]  T. Gemtos,et al.  Evaluation of the use of LIDAR laser scanner to map pruning wood in vineyards and its potential for management zones delineation , 2018, Precision Agriculture.

[36]  M. Diago,et al.  In field quantification and discrimination of different vineyard water regimes by on-the-go NIR spectroscopy , 2018 .

[37]  José Blasco,et al.  A new method for assessment of bunch compactness using automated image analysis , 2015 .

[38]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[39]  P. Mahalanobis.  On the generalized distance in statistics , 1936 .

[40]  James A. Taylor,et al.  Sampling and Estimating Average Pruning Weights in Concord Grapes , 2012, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.