Ambient Intelligence from Senior Citizens' Perspectives: Understanding Privacy Concerns, Technology Acceptance, and Expectations

Especially for seniors, Ambient Intelligence can provide assistance in daily living and emergency situations, for example by automatically recognizing critical situations. The use of such systems may involve trade-offs with regard to privacy, social stigmatization, and changes of the well-known living environment. This raises the question of how older adults perceive restrictions of privacy, accept technology, and which requirements are placed on Ambient Intelligent systems. In order to better understand the related concerns and expectations, we surveyed 60 senior citizens. The results show that experience with Ambient Intelligence increases technology acceptance and reduces fears regarding privacy violations and insufficient system reliability. While participants generally tolerate a monitoring of activities in their home, including bathrooms, they do not accept commercial service providers as data recipients. A comparison between four exemplary systems shows that camera-based solutions are perceived with much greater fears than wearable emergency solutions. Burglary detection was rated as similarly important assigned as health features, whereas living comfort features were considered less useful.

[1]  Frank Vahid,et al.  Privacy perception and fall detection accuracy for in-home video assistive monitoring with privacy enhancements , 2012, SIGHIT Rec..

[2]  Anne Adams,et al.  Users' perception of privacy in multimedia communication , 1999, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[3]  Ingrid Zukerman,et al.  In-home monitoring of older adults with vision impairment: exploring patients', caregivers' and professionals' views , 2014, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[4]  J. Vaupel,et al.  Ageing populations: the challenges ahead , 2009, The Lancet.

[5]  B. Reimer,et al.  Older Adult Perceptions of Smart Home Technologies: Implications for Research, Policy & Market Innovations in Healthcare , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  D. Bouwhuis,et al.  Older adults' motivated choice for technological innovation: evidence for benefit-driven selectivity. , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[7]  M. Skubic,et al.  Senior residents’ perceived need of and preferences for “smart home” sensor technologies , 2008, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[8]  A. Bourke,et al.  Fall detection - Principles and Methods , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  M. Skubic,et al.  Older adults' attitudes towards and perceptions of ‘smart home’ technologies: a pilot study , 2004, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[10]  L Spazzafumo,et al.  Acceptance and use of technological solutions by the elderly in the outdoor environment: findings from a European survey. , 2000, Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie.

[11]  Tobias Alexander Große-Puppendahl,et al.  Enhancing Accelerometer-Based Activity Recognition with Capacitive Proximity Sensing , 2012, AmI.

[12]  N. Edwards,et al.  Exploring seniors' views on the use of assistive devices in fall prevention. , 1998, Public health nursing.

[13]  Hongnian Yu,et al.  Perception of Smart Home Technologies toAssist Elderly People , 2010 .

[14]  Richard Beckwith,et al.  Designing for Ubiquity: The Perception of Privacy , 2003, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[15]  C. McCreadie,et al.  The acceptability of assistive technology to older people , 2005, Ageing and Society.