Validation of the textural realism of a 3D anthropomorphic phantom for digital breast tomosynthesis

In this paper, texture calculations are used to validate the realism of a physical anthropomorphic phantom for digital breast tomosynthesis. The texture features were compared against clinical mammography data. Three groups of features (grey-level histogram, co-occurrence, and run-length) were considered. The features were analyzed over a broad range of technique settings (kV and mAs). These calculations were done in the central slice of the reconstruction as well as the synthetic 2D mammogram. For each feature, the clinical data were binned into strata based on the compressed breast thickness. It was demonstrated that the clinical features vary by thickness. To evaluate the realism of the phantom, each feature was compared against clinical data in the same thickness stratum. For the purpose of this paper, a feature was considered to be realistic if it was within the middle 95% of the statistical distribution of clinical values. In the reconstruction, most features were found to exhibit realism; specifically, all 12 grey-level histogram features, four out of seven co-occurrence features, and three out of seven run-length features. The realism of most features was robust to changes in the technique settings. However, in the synthetic 2D mammogram, fewer features were found to exhibit realism. In conclusion, this paper provides a validation of the textural realism of the phantom in the reconstruction, and shows that there is less realism in the synthetic 2D mammogram. We identify the features that should be considered to refine the design of the phantom in future work.

[1]  Richard E. Sharpe,et al.  Increased Cancer Detection Rate and Variations in the Recall Rate Resulting from Implementation of 3D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis into a Population-based Screening Program. , 2016, Radiology.

[2]  Andriy I Bandos,et al.  Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammograms versus original digital mammograms alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images. , 2014, Radiology.

[3]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Towards Breast Anatomy Simulation Using GPUs , 2012, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[4]  E. Conant,et al.  Beyond breast density: a review on the advancing role of parenchymal texture analysis in breast cancer risk assessment , 2016, Breast Cancer Research.

[5]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Development and characterization of an anthropomorphic breast software phantom based upon region-growing algorithm. , 2011, Medical physics.

[6]  S. Gavenonis,et al.  Clinical Performance of Synthesized Two-dimensional Mammography Combined with Tomosynthesis in a Large Screening Population. , 2017, Radiology.

[7]  Yuanjie Zheng,et al.  Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: robust texture feature identification and equivalence across devices , 2015, Journal of medical imaging.

[8]  Andriy I Bandos,et al.  Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images. , 2014, Radiology.

[9]  David Gur,et al.  Dose reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening using synthetically reconstructed projection images: an observer performance study. , 2012, Academic radiology.

[10]  Andrew Oustimov,et al.  Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening. , 2016, JAMA oncology.

[11]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Optimized generation of high resolution breast anthropomorphic software phantoms. , 2012, Medical physics.

[12]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Implementation of Synthesized Two-dimensional Mammography in a Population-based Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Program. , 2016, Radiology.

[13]  S. Chikarmane,et al.  Strengths and Weaknesses of Synthetic Mammography in Screening. , 2017, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[14]  Ann-Katherine Carton,et al.  Development of a physical 3D anthropomorphic breast phantom. , 2011, Medical physics.

[15]  Yuanjie Zheng,et al.  Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessment. , 2015, Medical physics.

[16]  Yit Yoong Lim,et al.  Accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Depicting Breast Cancer Subgroups in a UK Retrospective Reading Study (TOMMY Trial). , 2015, Radiology.

[17]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Imaging With Synthesized 2D Mammography: Differences, Advantages, and Pitfalls Compared With Digital Mammography. , 2017, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Feasibility study of dose reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis using non-local denoising algorithms , 2015, Medical Imaging.

[19]  D. Kopans,et al.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art. , 2015, Radiology.

[20]  Emily F Conant,et al.  Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. , 2014, JAMA.