Analysis of a “cluster” strategy for introducing hydrogen vehicles in Southern California

The cost and logistics of building early hydrogen refueling infrastructure are key barriers to the commercialization of fuel cell vehicles. In this paper, we explore a "cluster strategy" for introducing hydrogen vehicles and refueling infrastructure in Southern California over the next decade, to satisfy California's Zero Emission Vehicle regulation. Clustering refers to coordinated introduction of hydrogen vehicles and refueling infrastructure in a few focused geographic areas such as smaller cities (e.g. Santa Monica, Irvine) within a larger region (e.g. Los Angeles Basin). We analyze several transition scenarios for introducing hundreds to tens of thousands of vehicles and 8-42 stations, considering: - Station placement - Convenience of the refueling network - Type of hydrogen supply - Economics (capital and operating costs of stations, hydrogen cost). A cluster strategy provides good convenience and reliability with a small number of strategically placed stations, reducing infrastructure costs. A cash flow analysis estimates infrastructure investments of $120-170 million might be needed to build a network of 42 stations serving the first 25,000 vehicles. As more vehicles are introduced, the network expands, larger stations are built and the cost of hydrogen becomes competitive on a cents per mile basis with gasoline.

[1]  Vincent Mahieu,et al.  Well-to-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the european context , 2004 .

[2]  Ryuichi Kitamura,et al.  Refueling behavior of automobile drivers , 1987 .

[3]  Christopher Yang,et al.  Determining the lowest-cost hydrogen delivery mode , 2007 .

[4]  Kenneth S Kurani,et al.  Refueling and the Vehicle Purchase Decision: The Diesel Car Case , 1987 .

[5]  Daniel Sperling,et al.  Testing Electric Vehicle Demand in `Hybrid Households' Using a Reflexive Survey , 1996 .

[6]  M. Melendez,et al.  Geographically Based Hydrogen Consumer Demand and Infrastructure Analysis: Final Report , 2006 .

[7]  Michael Kuby,et al.  Optimization of hydrogen stations in Florida using the Flow-Refueling Location Model , 2009 .

[8]  Kenneth S Kurani,et al.  APPLICATION OF A BEHAVIORAL MARKET SEGMENTATION THEORY TO NEW TRANSPORTATION FUELS IN NEW ZEALAND. , 1992 .

[9]  Jonathan X. Weinert,et al.  A Near-Term Economic Analysis of Hydrogen Fueling Stations , 2005 .

[10]  Jonathan Weinert,et al.  An Assessment of the Near-Term Costs of Hydrogen Refueling Stations and Station Components , 2006 .

[11]  Aie,et al.  Energy Technology Perspectives 2012 , 2006 .

[12]  Daniel Sperling,et al.  Using Geographic Information Systems to Evaluate Siting and Networks of Hydrogen Stations , 2004 .

[13]  M. Melaina Initiating hydrogen infrastructures: preliminary analysis of a sufficient number of initial hydrogen stations in the US , 2003 .

[14]  M. K. Singh,et al.  Multi-path transportation futures study : vehicle characterization and scenario analyses. , 2009 .

[15]  J. Ogden,et al.  Detailed Analysis of Urban Station Siting for California Hydrogen Highway Network , 2007 .

[16]  Marc Melaina,et al.  Refueling availability for alternative fuel vehicle markets: Sufficient urban station coverage , 2008 .

[17]  Joan M. Ogden,et al.  An Analysis of Near-Term Hydrogen Vehicle Rollout Scenarios for Southern California , 2010 .

[18]  D. Greene SURVEY EVIDENCE ON THE IMPORTANCE OF FUEL AVAILABILITY TO THE CHOICE OF ALTERNATIVE FUELS AND VEHICLES , 1998 .