Optimal control of Atlantic population Canada geese

Management of Canada geese (Branta canadensis) can be a balance between providing sustained harvest opportunity while not allowing populations to become overabundant and cause damage. In this paper, we focus on the Atlantic population of Canada geese and use stochastic dynamic programming to determine the optimal harvest strategy over a range of plausible models for population dynamics. There is evidence to suggest that the population exhibits significant age structure, and it is possible to reconstruct age structure from surveys. Consequently the harvest strategy is a function of the age composition, as well as the abundance, of the population. The objective is to maximize harvest while maintaining the number of breeding adults in the population between specified upper and lower limits. In addition, the total harvest capacity is limited and there is uncertainty about the strength of density-dependence. We find that under a density-independent model, harvest is maximized by maintaining the breeding population at the highest acceptable abundance. However if harvest capacity is limited, then the optimal long-term breeding population size is lower than the highest acceptable level, to reduce the risk of the population growing to an unacceptably large size. Under the proposed density-dependent model, harvest is maximized by maintaining the breeding population at an intermediate level between the bounds on acceptable population size; limits to harvest capacity have little effect on the optimal long-term population size. It is clear that the strength of density-dependence and constraints on harvest significantly affect the optimal harvest strategy for this population. Model discrimination might be achieved in the long term, while continuing to meet management goals, by adopting an adaptive management strategy.

[1]  C. T. Moore,et al.  Uncertainty and the management of mallard harvests , 1997 .

[2]  Michael C. Runge,et al.  THE IMPORTANCE OF FUNCTIONAL FORM IN OPTIMAL CONTROL SOLUTIONS OF PROBLEMS IN POPULATION DYNAMICS , 2002 .

[3]  R. M. Arthur ON THE RELATION BETWEEN REPRODUCTIVE VALUE AND OPTIMAL PREDATION. , 1960 .

[4]  Max Stocker,et al.  Ungulate population dynamics and optimization models , 1983 .

[5]  C. Walters,et al.  Uncertainty, resource exploitation, and conservation: lessons from history. , 1993, Science.

[6]  C. D. Ankney,et al.  An embarrassment of riches : Too many geese , 1996 .

[7]  Martin L. Puterman,et al.  Markov Decision Processes: Discrete Stochastic Dynamic Programming , 1994 .

[8]  ON THE RELATION BETWEEN REPRODUCTIVE VALUE AND OPTIMAL PREDATION. , 1960, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  J. Beddington,et al.  Achieving sustainable use of renewable resources. , 1993, Science.

[10]  G. Nugent,et al.  Comparing cost-effectiveness of commercial harvesting, state-funded culling, and recreational deer hunting in New Zealand , 2004 .

[11]  Ernie P. Wiggers,et al.  Comparison of 4 methods to reduce white-tailed deer abundance in an urban community , 2001 .

[12]  Erlend B. Nilsen,et al.  Moose harvesting strategies in the presence of wolves , 2005 .

[13]  R. Rosatte Management of raccoons (Procyon lotor) in Ontario, Canada: Do human intervention and disease have significant impact on raccoon populations ? , 2000 .

[14]  B K Williams,et al.  Adaptive optimization and the harvest of biological populations. , 1996, Mathematical biosciences.

[15]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources , 1986 .

[16]  Steinar Engen,et al.  Optimal Harvesting of Fluctuating Populations with a Risk of Extinction , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[17]  William J. Reed,et al.  Optimal escapement levels in stochastic and deterministic harvesting models , 1979 .

[18]  C. Walters Optimum Escapements in the Face of Alternative Recruitment Hypotheses , 1981 .

[19]  E. J. Milner-Gulland,et al.  A STOCHASTIC DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING MODEL FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE SAIGA ANTELOPE , 1997 .

[20]  B. Bönner,et al.  Do Canada geese (Branta canadensis Linnaeus, 1758) carry infectious agents for birds and man? , 2004, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[21]  F. Johnson,et al.  Conditions and Limitations on Learning in the Adaptive Management of Mallard Harvests , 2002 .

[22]  Cindy E. Hauser,et al.  Control of structured populations by harvest , 2006 .

[23]  J. Lebreton,et al.  Optimizing removals to control a metapopulation: application to the yellow legged herring gull (Larus cachinnans) , 2001 .

[24]  C. Walters,et al.  Optimal harvesting with imprecise parameter estimates , 1982 .

[25]  C. Findlay,et al.  EFFECTIVENESS OF A SELECTIVE HARVEST SYSTEM IN REGULATING DEER POPULATIONS IN ONTARIO , 2004 .

[26]  A. Poole,et al.  Canada Goose ( Branta canadensis ) , 2020 .

[27]  Bernt-Erik Sæther,et al.  Density-dependence and optimal harvesting of fluctuating populations , 1996 .

[28]  Byron K. Williams,et al.  Adaptive optimization of renewable natural resources: Solution algorithms and a computer program , 1996 .

[29]  C. Walters Optimal Harvest Strategies for Salmon in Relation to Environmental Variability and Uncertain Production Parameters , 1975 .

[30]  F. Johnson,et al.  MANAGING NORTH AMERICAN WATERFOWL IN THE FACE OF UNCERTAINTY , 1995 .

[31]  Byron K. Williams,et al.  Uncertainty, learning, and the optimal management of wildlife , 2001, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[32]  F. Johnson,et al.  Uncertainty and the Adaptive Management of Waterfowl Harvests , 1996 .