Numerical and Parametric Study of MVGs on a UAV Geometry in Subsonic Flow

This work details how numerical methods can be employed to determine the optimal arrangement of multiple micro vortex generators (MVG) installed on a UAV wing with its flaps deflected/deployed. For very little cost, the use of MVGs can substantially improve the aerodynamic performance of the UAV by increasing the lift and reducing the drag, particularly during critical phases of the flight (takeoff and landing). The optimal position, related to the detachment zone, and height, related to the boundary layer, of a vortex generator is studied numerically by solving the three dimensional Navier-Stokes equations in a simplified configuration. The numerical study includes a reference baseline configuration. A parametric study is then performed to determine, which configuration gives the maximum gain—highest lift/drag ratio. A preliminary numerical study of convergence for different grids to ensure convergency of the solutions is included. Finally, considering these results, a selection of the optimal configurations based on the aerodynamic performance and the manufacturing limitations.

[1]  Brian G. Allan,et al.  Flow-Field Measurement of Device-Induced Embedded Streamwise Vortex on a Flat Plate , 2002 .

[2]  J. Lin,et al.  Small submerged vortex generators for turbulent flow separation control , 1990 .

[3]  Yuichi Kuya,et al.  Flow Separation Control on a Race Car Wing With Vortex Generators in Ground Effect , 2009 .

[4]  P. R. Ashill,et al.  A Review of Flow Control Research at Dera , 1999 .

[5]  J. Lin,et al.  Exploratory study of vortex-generating devices for turbulent flow separation control , 1991 .

[6]  Stephen K. Robinson,et al.  Separation control on high-lift airfoils via micro-vortex generators , 1994 .

[7]  John Fulker,et al.  Studies of flows induced by Sub Boundary Layer Vortex Generators (SBVGs) , 2002 .

[8]  John C. Lin,et al.  Review of research on low-profile vortex generators to control boundary-layer separation , 2002 .

[9]  R. Blackwelder,et al.  Vortex generators used to control laminar separation bubbles , 1993 .

[10]  L. N. Jenkins,et al.  FLOW CONTROL DEVICE EVALUATION FOR AN INTERNAL FLOW WITH AN ADVERSE PRESSURE GRADIENT , 2002 .

[11]  John Fulker,et al.  Research at DERA on sub boundary layer vortex generators (SBVGs) , 2001 .

[12]  Chaoqun Liu,et al.  Review of Micro Vortex Generators in High-Speed Flow , 2011 .

[13]  Tsze C. Tai,et al.  Effect of Midwing Vortex Generators on V-22 Aircraft Forward-Flight Aerodynamics , 2002 .

[14]  Eusebio Valero,et al.  Aerodynamic technologies to improve aircraft performance , 2013 .

[15]  D. M. Bushnell,et al.  Investigation of several passive and active methods for turbulent flow separation control , 1990 .

[16]  Li Jiang,et al.  Numerical study of passive and active flow separation control over a NACA0012 airfoil , 2008 .

[17]  John C. Lin,et al.  A flow physics study of vortex generators on a multi-element airfoil , 1996 .

[18]  P. R. Ashill,et al.  Separation control on highly-swept wings with fixed or variable camber , 1995 .

[19]  Jeffrey W. Hamstra,et al.  Active inlet flow control technology demonstration , 2000, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[20]  Frank K. Lu,et al.  Experimental Study of Near Wake of Micro Vortex Generators in Supersonic Flow , 2010 .

[21]  D. Mccormick,et al.  Shock/boundary-layer interaction control with vortex generators and passive cavity , 1993 .

[22]  William Murphy,et al.  The application of sub-boundary layer vortex generators to reduce canopy 'Mach rumble' interior noise on the Gulfstream III , 1987 .

[23]  Patrick Ralph Ashill,et al.  A review of recent developments in flow control , 2005, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).