This racket is not mine: The influence of the tool-use on peripersonal space

&NA; The aim of the present study was to test whether the peripersonal space (PPS), defined as the portion of the space immediately surrounding the body, is modulated by the long‐term motor experience with a specific tool in a sportsmen population. To this end, we evaluated, by means of a multisensory integration paradigm, how tennis players and novices to the sport of tennis perceived the PPS while holding a tennis racket. Going deeply, in the case of the athletes, we tested the effect of their personal racket, i.e., the one they regularly use during their sport activities, compared to a common one. When handling one of these objects or nothing, participants were requested to verbally respond to a tactile stimulus administered at the right wrist while hearing a task‐irrelevant sound emitted by a speaker positioned either near to the hand (Near) or far from it (Far). Reaction time to a tactile stimulus associated with the Far sound were higher than those associated with the Near sound when tennis players and novices held the common racket, whereas this difference disappeared when the athletes handled the personal tennis racket. These results suggest that the tool daily used during sport activity is stably embodied in the peripersonal space of tennis players. HighlightsPeripersonal space (PPS) representation is assessed in tennis players.A multisensory integration paradigm is used to evaluate tool integration in PPS.Only the personal, not a common tennis racket is embodied in tennis players' PPS.Embodiment of the personal tennis racket increases with the hours of playing.PPS representation is strictly linked with the familiarity gained with the tool.

[1]  A. Maravita,et al.  Tools for the body (schema) , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  W. Epstein,et al.  Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  M. Tanaka,et al.  Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[4]  Olaf Blanke,et al.  The wheelchair as a full-body tool extending the peripersonal space , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[5]  Jérémy Bourgeois,et al.  Effect of visuomotor calibration and uncertainty on the perception of peripersonal space , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[6]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Coding of peripersonal space in inferior premotor cortex (area F4). , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Salvatore M Aglioti,et al.  Kinesthetic imagery and tool-specific modulation of corticospinal representations in expert tennis players. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  Andrea Serino,et al.  Fronto-parietal Areas Necessary for a Multisensory Representation of Peripersonal Space in Humans: An rTMS Study , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  M. Costantini,et al.  The space of affordances: A TMS study , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Carlotta Fossataro,et al.  When your arm becomes mine: Pathological embodiment of alien limbs using tools modulates own body representation , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  G. Pellegrino,et al.  Peripersonal space in the brain , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  Jorge A. Santos,et al.  Keeping you at arm’s length: modifying peripersonal space influences interpersonal distance , 2017, Psychological research.

[13]  Alessandro Farnè,et al.  Peripersonal Space and Body Schema: Two Labels for the Same Concept? , 2009, Brain Topography.

[14]  C. Spence,et al.  Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans , 2002, Cognition.

[15]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  A brief review of the role of training in near-tool effects , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[16]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  View dependencies in the visual recognition of social interactions , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[17]  A Farnè,et al.  Dynamic size‐change of hand peripersonal space following tool use , 2000, Neuroreport.

[18]  Andrea Serino,et al.  Action-dependent plasticity in peripersonal space representations , 2008, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[19]  Justine C. Cléry,et al.  Neuronal bases of peripersonal and extrapersonal spaces, their plasticity and their dynamics: Knowns and unknowns , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  Catherine L. Reed,et al.  Grab it! Biased attention in functional hand and tool space , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[21]  Andrea Serino,et al.  Everyday use of the computer mouse extends peripersonal space representation , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  Jérémy Bourgeois,et al.  Costs and benefits of tool-use on the perception of reachable space. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[23]  Nicholas P. Holmes,et al.  Multi-Sensory Interactions , 2008 .

[24]  G Rizzolatti,et al.  The Space Around Us , 1997, Science.

[25]  Atsushi Iriki,et al.  Shaping multisensory action–space with tools: evidence from patients with cross-modal extinction , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  M. Graziano.  Where is my arm? The relative role of vision and proprioception in the neuronal representation of limb position. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  G. Verni,et al.  Amputation and prosthesis implantation shape body and peripersonal space representations , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[28]  M. Bassolino,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Extended Multisensory Space in Blind Cane Users , 2022 .

[29]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  Y. Wu,et al.  The effect of motor imagery with specific implement in expert badminton player , 2014, Neuroscience.

[31]  M. Bove,et al.  The tool as the last piece of the athlete’s gesture imagery puzzle , 2014, Neuroscience.