Topology design of structures subjected to periodic loading

Although a lot of attention in the topology optimization literature has focused on the optimization of eigenfrequencies in free vibration problems, relatively little work has been done on the optimization of structures subjected to periodic loading. In this paper, we propose two measures, one global and the other local, for the minimization of vibrations of structures subjected to periodic loading. The global measure which we term as the “dynamic compliance” reduces the vibrations in an overall sense, and thus has important implications from the viewpoint of reducing the noise radiated from a structure, while the local measure reduces the vibrations at a user-defined point. Both measures bring about a reduction in the vibration level by moving the natural frequencies which contribute most significantly to the measures, away from the driving frequencies, although, as expected, in different ways. Quite surprisingly, the structure of the dynamic compliance optimization problem turns out to be very similar to the structure of the static compliance optimization problem. The availability of analytical sensitivities results in an efficient algorithm for both measures. We show the effectiveness of the measures by presenting some numerical examples.

[1]  R. Cook,et al.  Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis , 1974 .

[2]  E. Johnson,et al.  Disjoint design spaces in the optimization of harmonically excited structures , 1976 .

[3]  J. Z. Zhu,et al.  The finite element method , 1977 .

[4]  Bo Ping Wang,et al.  Vibration reduction over a frequency range , 1983 .

[5]  I. U. Ojalvo,et al.  Efficient Computation of Mode-Shape Derivatives for Large Dynamic Systems , 1986 .

[6]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method , 1988 .

[7]  D. Watts,et al.  Design Optimization of Response Amplitudes in Viscously Damped Structures , 1990 .

[8]  Ting-Yu Chen Optimum design of structures with both natural frequency and frequency response constraints , 1992 .

[9]  N. Kikuchi,et al.  Solutions to shape and topology eigenvalue optimization problems using a homogenization method , 1992 .

[10]  J. S. Lamancusa,et al.  Numerical optimization techniques for structural-acoustic design of rectangular panels , 1993 .

[11]  C. S. Jog,et al.  Topology design with optimized, self‐adaptive materials , 1994 .

[12]  M. P. Bendsøe,et al.  Optimization of material properties for improved frequency response , 1994 .

[13]  N. Kikuchi,et al.  Topological design for vibrating structures , 1995 .

[14]  Zheng-Dong Ma,et al.  Topological Optimization Technique for Free Vibration Problems , 1995 .

[15]  Martin P. Bendsøe,et al.  Optimization of Structural Topology, Shape, And Material , 1995 .

[16]  K. Bathe Finite Element Procedures , 1995 .

[17]  C. S. Jog,et al.  Stability of finite element models for distributed-parameter optimization and topology design , 1996 .

[18]  Chao Yang,et al.  ARPACK users' guide - solution of large-scale eigenvalue problems with implicitly restarted Arnoldi methods , 1998, Software, environments, tools.

[19]  N. Olhoff,et al.  Optimum topology and reinforcement design of disk and plate structures with multiple stiffness and eigenfrequency objectives , 1999 .

[20]  C. S. Jog Reducing Radiated Sound Power by Minimizing the Dynamic Compliance , 2002 .

[21]  Ml Munjal IUTAM Symposium on Designing for Quietness , 2002 .