Direct volumetric blood flow measurement in coronary arteries by thermodilution.

OBJECTIVES This study sought to validate a new method for direct volumetric blood flow measurement in coronary arteries in animals and in conscious humans during cardiac catheterization. BACKGROUND Direct volumetric measurement of blood flow in selective coronary arteries would be useful for studying the coronary circulation. METHODS Based on the principle of thermodilution with continuous low-rate infusion of saline at room temperature, we designed an instrumental setup for direct flow measurement during cardiac catheterization. A 2.8-F infusion catheter and a standard 0.014-inch sensor-tipped pressure/temperature guidewire were used to calculate absolute flow (Q(thermo)) in a coronary artery from the infusion rate of saline, temperature of the saline at the tip of the infusion catheter, and distal blood temperature during infusion. The method was tested over a wide range of flow rates in 5 chronically instrumented dogs and in 35 patients referred for physiological assessment of a coronary stenosis or for percutaneous coronary intervention. RESULTS Thermodilution-derived flow corresponded well with true flow (Q) in all dogs (Q(thermo) = 0.73 Q + 42 ml/min; R(2) = 0.72). Reproducibility was excellent (Q(thermo,)(1) = 0.96 x Q(thermo,)(2) + 3 ml/min; R(2) = 0.89). The measurements were independent of infusion rate and sensor position as predicted by theory. In the humans, a good agreement was found between increase of thermodilution-derived volumetric blood flow after percutaneous coronary intervention and increase of fractional flow reserve (R(2) = 0.84); reproducibility of the measurements was excellent (Q(thermo,)(1) = 1.0 Q(thermo,)(2) + 0.9 ml/min, R(2) = 0.97), and the measurements were independent of infusion rate and sensor position. CONCLUSIONS Using a suitable infusion catheter and a 0.014-inch sensor-tipped guidewire for measurement of coronary pressure and temperature, volumetric blood flow can be directly measured in selective coronary arteries during cardiac catheterization.

[1]  J. Tyberg,et al.  Coronary Sinus Reflux: A Source of Error in the Measurement of Thermodilution Coronary Sinus Flow , 1978, Circulation.

[2]  R. Krams,et al.  New invasive techniques of assessment of the physiological significance of coronary stenoses in humans. , 1995, European heart journal.

[3]  A. Luxen,et al.  Direct Comparison of [13N]Ammonia and [150]Water Estimates of Perfusion With Quantification of Regional Myocardial Blood Flow by Microspheres , 1993, Circulation.

[4]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[5]  B. De Bruyne,et al.  Experimental Basis of Determining Maximum Coronary, Myocardial, and Collateral Blood Flow by Pressure Measurements for Assessing Functional Stenosis Severity Before and After Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty , 1993, Circulation.

[6]  M. Kern,et al.  From research to clinical practice: current role of intracoronary physiologically based decision making in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  Ganesh Manoharan,et al.  Epicardial Stenosis Severity Does Not Affect Minimal Microcirculatory Resistance , 2004, Circulation.

[8]  K. Gould,et al.  Identifying and Measuring Severity of Coronary Artery Stenosis: Quantitative Coronary Arteriography and Positron Emission Tomography , 1988, Circulation.

[9]  H. Swan,et al.  Measurement of Coronary Sinus Blood Flow by Continuous Thermodilution in Man , 1971, Circulation.

[10]  W. Rutishauser,et al.  Evaluation of Roentgen Cinedensitometry for Flow Measurement in Models and in the Intact Circulation , 1967, Circulation.

[11]  J. Bagger.  Coronary sinus blood flow determination by the thermodilution technique: influence of catheter position and respiration. , 1985, Cardiovascular research.

[12]  A. Yeung,et al.  Microvascular Resistance Is Not Influenced by Epicardial Coronary Artery Stenosis Severity: Experimental Validation , 2004, Circulation.

[13]  T. Regan,et al.  A comparison of thermodilution coronary sinus blood flows and krypton myocardial blood flows in the intact dog. , 1974, Cardiovascular research.

[14]  P. H. van der Voort,et al.  Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  P. H. van der Voort,et al.  Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. , 1995, Circulation.

[16]  M. Winniford,et al.  Effect of increases in heart rate and arterial pressure on coronary flow reserve in humans. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  W. Wijns,et al.  Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Prior Myocardial Infarction , 2001, Circulation.

[18]  R. Wilson,et al.  Transluminal, subselective measurement of coronary artery blood flow velocity and vasodilator reserve in man. , 1985, Circulation.

[19]  F. N. van de Vosse,et al.  Coronary Thermodilution to Assess Flow Reserve: Validation in Humans , 2002, Circulation.

[20]  W. Wijns,et al.  Simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements in humans. Feasibility, reproducibility, and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index, and fractional flow reserve. , 1996, Circulation.

[21]  T van der Werf,et al.  Mean transit time for the assessment of myocardial perfusion by videodensitometry. , 1990, Circulation.

[22]  F. Plum.  Handbook of Physiology. , 1960 .