Clinical uses of microbubbles in diagnosis and treatment

The development of microbubbles as ultrasound contrast agents (USCA) has opened the way for new and extended applications of ultrasound in clinical practise as well as offering rich new research opportunities. Some of the experimentally developed applications have been accepted into clinical practise and the European Federation has published guidelines on their use, particularly in the liver [18]. Many new applications are being explored and the field is unusual in imaging because its proper exploration depends on parallel development by the pharmaceutical and ultrasound equipment manufacturers. Microbubbles are unique amongst contrast agents for imaging in that the imaging process changes the agent and even destroys it. They contain gases that respond to the pressure changes of the ultrasound by changing size and this forms the basis for their selective imaging. In addition, when the volume changes reach a threshold, the oscillations become sufficiently violent that the microbubbles disintegrate (either by fragmentation or dissolution) and thus the contrast effect can be switched off remotely. Their body distribution is different from most contrast agents in that they are too large to diffuse through the endothelium and so behave as pure blood pool agents after intravenous injection. Their main diagnostic uses depend on detecting them in the blood circulation and, in a simple way, this represents an extension of Doppler which is given a boost by the 20? dB additional signal that the microbubbles produce. This is especially useful in situations where Doppler signal are poor. The best example is the cerebral vessels, from which signals are attenuated by the skull: adding microbubbles boosts the signals so that they are more reliably obtained. However, of more general interest is the fact that nonlinear detection techniques do not depend on microbubble movement, instead depending on their presence in the blood vessels regardless of calibre. Thus, not only can the macrovasculature be interrogated but, for the first time, the microvasculature, including the capacious capillary bed, can be imaged. Of course, these ten micron vessels cannot be resolved, as they would be by a microscope, but the signals from microbubbles within them can be displayed, much as in an angiogram. In addition to exploiting the distribution in space of microbubbles, e.g. for tumour diagnosis, the dynamics of their arrival and disappearance, e.g. after bolus injection, can be tracked using the high temporal resolution of ultrasound. This is mostly done in a qualitative way when, for example, the haemodynamics of the blood supply to liver masses is accessed by eye. It can also be measured more formally, using scanner software to quantify the microbubble signal intensity over time and generate time– intensity curves (TICs). This has been shown to be especially promising in evaluating the microvasculature of tumours and of the myocardium.

[1]  D. Cosgrove,et al.  Ovarian cancer detected non‐invasively by contrast‐enhanced power Doppler ultrasound , 2004 .

[2]  Kevin Wei,et al.  Contrast Echocardiography: Applications and Limitations , 2012, Current problems in cardiology.

[3]  Harald Becher,et al.  Handbook of Contrast Echocardiography , 2000, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[4]  Carlo Magno,et al.  Contrast-enhanced second-harmonic sonography in the detection of pseudocapsule in renal cell carcinoma. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  T. Livraghi,et al.  Radiofrequency Ablation of Liver Tumors: The Role of Microbubble Ultrasound Contrast Agents , 2006, Ultrasound quarterly.

[6]  G. Zamboni,et al.  Ultrasonography of the pancreas. 4. Contrast-enhanced imaging , 2007, Abdominal Imaging.

[7]  A. Roche,et al.  [Imaging and angiogenesis: DCE-US (dynamic contrast enhanced-ultrasonography)]. , 2007, Bulletin du cancer.

[8]  L. Bolondi,et al.  Real time contrast enhanced ultrasonography in detection of liver metastases from gastrointestinal cancer , 2007, BMC Cancer.

[9]  M. Verani,et al.  Identification of Hibernating Myocardium With Quantitative Intravenous Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography: Comparison With Dobutamine Echocardiography and Thallium-201 Scintigraphy , 2003, Circulation.

[10]  Attila Nemes,et al.  Usefulness of ultrasound contrast agent to improve image quality during real-time three-dimensional stress echocardiography. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  L. Bolondi,et al.  Characterization of liver lesions by real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasonography , 2007, European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology.

[12]  W. McDicken,et al.  In vitro acoustic characterisation of four intravenous ultrasonic contrast agents at 30 MHz. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  K. Tachibana,et al.  Gene transfer with echo-enhanced contrast agents: comparison between Albunex, Optison, and Levovist in mice--initial results. , 2003, Radiology.

[14]  M. Bosio,et al.  Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) - Update 2008 , 2008, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[15]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Molecular ultrasound imaging using microbubble contrast agents. , 2007, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[16]  O. Catalano,et al.  Contrast-enhanced sonography of the spleen. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  M. Penicka,et al.  Identification of hibernating myocardium with myocardial contrast echocardiography: comparison with late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance. , 2008, International journal of cardiology.

[18]  R Gramiak,et al.  Echocardiography of the aortic root. , 1968, Investigative radiology.

[19]  O. Kamp,et al.  The use of contrast echocardiography for the detection of cardiac shunts. , 2007, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[20]  M. Wiesmann,et al.  Renal perfusion imaging using contrast-enhanced phase-inversion ultrasound. , 2004, Clinical Nephrology.

[21]  M. Dill-Macky Aortic Endografts: Detecting Endoleaks Using Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound , 2006, Ultrasound quarterly.

[22]  L. Bolondi,et al.  The safety of Sonovue in abdominal applications: retrospective analysis of 23188 investigations. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[23]  R. Senior,et al.  Safety of an intravenous second generation contrast agent in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction , 2000, Heart.

[24]  M. Fishbein,et al.  Dissolution of thrombotic arterial occlusion by high intensity, low frequency ultrasound and dodecafluoropentane emulsion: an in vitro and in vivo study. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  Luigi Solbiati,et al.  Guidance and monitoring of radiofrequency liver tumor ablation with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. , 2004, European journal of radiology.

[26]  Eric Allémann,et al.  Molecular Imaging of Human Thrombus With Novel Abciximab Immunobubbles and Ultrasound , 2007, Stroke.

[27]  Stephanie R. Wilson,et al.  Detecting endoleaks in aortic endografts using contrast-enhanced sonography. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  Ultrasonography of the pancreas. , 1991 .

[29]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Vibrating microbubbles poking individual cells: drug transfer into cells via sonoporation. , 2006, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[30]  P. Lechat,et al.  Prevalence of patent foramen ovale in patients with stroke. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  T. Ryan,et al.  Stress echocardiography from 1979 to present. , 2008, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[32]  Nathaniel Reichek,et al.  Stress echocardiography , 1993, Current opinion in cardiology.

[33]  P. Vallone,et al.  Contrast-enhanced sonography of the spleen. , 2005, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[34]  L. Thorelius Contrast–enhanced ultrasound in trauma , 2004, European radiology.

[35]  A. Khalid,et al.  Acute mortality in hospitalized patients undergoing echocardiography with and without an ultrasound contrast agent: results in 18,671 consecutive studies. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[36]  Hui-Xiong Xu,et al.  Imaging of Peripheral Cholangiocarcinoma With Low‐Mechanical Index Contrast‐Enhanced Sonography and SonoVue , 2006, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[37]  C. Harvey,et al.  Ultrasound of focal liver lesions , 2001, European Radiology.

[38]  E. Halpern,et al.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of prostate cancer. , 2006, Reviews in urology.

[39]  Mark Borden,et al.  Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery. , 2007, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[40]  T. Kondo,et al.  Effects of microbubbles on ultrasound-mediated gene transfer in human prostate cancer PC3 cells: comparison among Levovist, YM454, and MRX-815H. , 2008, Cancer letters.

[41]  M. Cova,et al.  Comparison of visual and quantitative analysis for characterization of insonated liver tumors after microbubble contrast injection. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[42]  David Cosgrove,et al.  Ultrasound contrast agents: an overview. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[43]  E. Unger,et al.  Targeted-Microbubble Binding Selectively to GPIIb IIIa Receptors of Platelet Thrombi , 2002, Investigative radiology.

[44]  C. Visser,et al.  Adverse reactions to ultrasound contrast agents: is the risk worth the benefit? , 2005, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[45]  C. Nicolau,et al.  The use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the management of the cirrhotic patient and for detection of HCC , 2004, European radiology.

[46]  M. Halliwell,et al.  Optimisation of ultrasound-mediated gene transfer (sonoporation) in skeletal muscle cells. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[47]  A R Padhani,et al.  The RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria: implications for diagnostic radiologists. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[48]  P. Grayburn,et al.  Thinking outside the "box"-the ultrasound contrast controversy. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[49]  Alastair McKinlay The ultrasonic boom—Focus on health and safety , 2007 .

[50]  V. Sharma,et al.  Prevalence of patent foramen ovale in patients with migraine. , 2008, Agri : Agri (Algoloji) Dernegi'nin Yayin organidir = The journal of the Turkish Society of Algology.

[51]  B. Choi,et al.  Vascularity of hepatocellular carcinoma: assessment with contrast-enhanced second-harmonic versus conventional power Doppler US. , 2000, Radiology.

[52]  Junru Wu,et al.  Ultrasound-induced cell lysis and sonoporation enhanced by contrast agents. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[53]  P. Nihoyannopoulos,et al.  Assessment of left ventricular wall motion and delineation of the endocardial border after intravenous injection of InfosonTM during dobutamine stress echocardiography , 1998 .

[54]  C. Nicolau,et al.  Evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma using SonoVue, a second generation ultrasound contrast agent: correlation with cellular differentiation , 2004, European Radiology.

[55]  Yang Liu,et al.  Therapeutic ultrasound: Its application in drug delivery , 2002, Medicinal research reviews.

[56]  G. Torzilli Contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasonography in surgery for liver tumors. , 2004, European journal of radiology.

[57]  Eric Tom,et al.  Myocardial Ischemic Memory Imaging With Molecular Echocardiography , 2007, Circulation.

[58]  Linda Chami,et al.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with imatinib: monitoring response with contrast-enhanced sonography. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[59]  M. Gregor,et al.  Characterization and detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): comparison of the ultrasound contrast agents SonoVue (BR 1) and Levovist (SH U 508A) , 2007, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[60]  J. Folkman Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid and other disease , 1995, Nature Medicine.

[61]  A. Klibanov Ultrasound molecular imaging with targeted microbubble contrast agents , 2007, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[62]  G. Torzilli,et al.  Contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasonography: a valuable and not any more monocentric diagnostic technique performed in different ways. , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[63]  J. Lindner,et al.  Cellular and Molecular Imaging With Targeted Contrast Ultrasound , 2006, Ultrasound quarterly.

[64]  Junru Wu,et al.  Bioeffects Considerations for Diagnostic Ultrasound Contrast Agents , 2008, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[65]  Sigmund Frigstad,et al.  Accurate and reproducible measurement of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by contrast echocardiography: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[66]  R. Pozzi Mucelli,et al.  [Differential patterns of contrast enhancement in different focal liver lesions after injection of the microbubble US contrast agent SonoVue]. , 2004, La Radiologia medica.

[67]  S. Kersting,et al.  The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for focal liver lesion detection: an overview. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[68]  M. Bellomi,et al.  Contrast enhanced ultrasound of breast cancer , 2006, Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society.

[69]  R. Schlief,et al.  Improved sensitivity of color Doppler by SH U 454. , 1989, The American journal of cardiology.

[70]  M. Krix Quantification of enhancement in contrast ultrasound: a tool for monitoring of therapies in liver metastases , 2005, European radiology.

[71]  G. Sutherland,et al.  Clinical evaluation of left heart Doppler contrast enhancement by a saccharide-based transpulmonary contrast agent. The Levovist Cardiac Working Group. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[72]  M. D’Onofrio,et al.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) of the pancreas , 2007 .

[73]  Stephanie R Wilson,et al.  An algorithm for the diagnosis of focal liver masses using microbubble contrast-enhanced pulse-inversion sonography. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[74]  P. Nihoyannopoulos,et al.  The clinical applications of myocardial contrast echocardiography. , 2007, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[75]  L. Shaw,et al.  Left ventricular opacification for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease with stress echocardiography: an angiographic study of incremental benefit and cost-effectiveness. , 2007, American heart journal.

[76]  D. Cosgrove Future Prospects for SonoVue and CPS , 2004, European radiology.

[77]  Jagat Narula,et al.  Imaging vulnerable plaque by ultrasound. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[78]  A. Bennis,et al.  Patent foramen ovale: a new disease? , 2007, International journal of cardiology.

[79]  P. Sidhu,et al.  Microbubble contrast–enhanced ultrasound in liver transplantation , 2004, European radiology.

[80]  K. Darge,et al.  Reflux in young patients: comparison of voiding US of the bladder and retrovesical space with echo enhancement versus voiding cystourethrography for diagnosis. , 1999 .

[81]  M. Zeier,et al.  Real‐time contrast‐enhanced sonography in renal transplant recipients , 2006, Clinical transplantation.

[82]  W. Wagner,et al.  Targeting and ultrasound imaging of microbubble-based contrast agents , 1999, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[83]  M. Astegiano,et al.  Activity of Crohn disease: value of Color-Power-Doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography , 2004, Abdominal Imaging.

[84]  K. Tachibana,et al.  Albumin microbubble echo-contrast material as an enhancer for ultrasound accelerated thrombolysis. , 1995, Circulation.

[85]  J. Charboneau,et al.  The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in planning treatment protocols for hepatocellular carcinoma before radiofrequency ablation. , 2007, Clinical radiology.

[86]  C. Fellbaum,et al.  Differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma by contrast-enhanced ultrasound. , 2005, The British journal of radiology.

[87]  Yoichiro Matsumoto,et al.  Use of a microbubble agent to increase the effects of high intensity focused ultrasound on liver tissue , 2005, European Radiology.

[88]  Roxy Senior,et al.  Contrast echocardiography: evidence for clinical use. , 2008, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[89]  C. Kalogeropoulou,et al.  Prospective multicenter trial evaluating a novel method of characterizing focal liver lesions using contrast-enhanced sonography. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[90]  A. Padhani,et al.  The RECIST criteria: implications for diagnostic radiologists , 2001 .

[91]  Michel Claudon,et al.  Renal arteries in patients at risk of renal arterial stenosis: multicenter evaluation of the echo-enhancer SH U 508A at color and spectral Doppler US. Levovist Renal Artery Stenosis Study Group. , 2000, Radiology.

[92]  Fuminori Moriyasu,et al.  Phagocytosis of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles by Kupffer cells. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[93]  Linda Chami,et al.  To predict progression-free survival and overall survival in metastatic renal cancer treated with sorafenib: pilot study using dynamic contrast-enhanced Doppler ultrasound. , 2006, European journal of cancer.

[94]  A. Rabinowitz,et al.  Systemic delivery of morpholino oligonucleotide restores dystrophin expression bodywide and improves dystrophic pathology , 2006, Nature Medicine.

[95]  Hui-Xiong Xu,et al.  Unusual Benign Focal Liver Lesions , 2008, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[96]  Young Han Kim,et al.  Early Assessment of the Therapeutic Response to Radio Frequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2003, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[97]  Michel Schneider,et al.  Molecular imaging and ultrasound-assisted drug delivery. , 2008, Journal of endourology.

[98]  Sverre Holm,et al.  Albunex-a new ultrasound contrast agent , 1993 .

[99]  Robert J. Eckersley,et al.  Developments in ultrasound contrast media , 2001, European Radiology.

[100]  Attila Nemes,et al.  Comparison of contrast agent-enhanced versus non-contrast agent-enhanced real-time three-dimensional echocardiography for analysis of left ventricular systolic function. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[101]  Thomas H Marwick,et al.  Combination of contrast with stress echocardiography: A practical guide to methods and interpretation , 2004, Cardiovascular ultrasound.

[102]  M. D’Onofrio,et al.  Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography versus baseline ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography in metastatic disease of the liver: diagnostic performance and confidence , 2006, European Radiology.