Computational fluid dynamics modelling in cardiovascular medicine

This paper reviews the methods, benefits and challenges associated with the adoption and translation of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modelling within cardiovascular medicine. CFD, a specialist area of mathematics and a branch of fluid mechanics, is used routinely in a diverse range of safety-critical engineering systems, which increasingly is being applied to the cardiovascular system. By facilitating rapid, economical, low-risk prototyping, CFD modelling has already revolutionised research and development of devices such as stents, valve prostheses, and ventricular assist devices. Combined with cardiovascular imaging, CFD simulation enables detailed characterisation of complex physiological pressure and flow fields and the computation of metrics which cannot be directly measured, for example, wall shear stress. CFD models are now being translated into clinical tools for physicians to use across the spectrum of coronary, valvular, congenital, myocardial and peripheral vascular diseases. CFD modelling is apposite for minimally-invasive patient assessment. Patient-specific (incorporating data unique to the individual) and multi-scale (combining models of different length- and time-scales) modelling enables individualised risk prediction and virtual treatment planning. This represents a significant departure from traditional dependence upon registry-based, population-averaged data. Model integration is progressively moving towards ‘digital patient’ or ‘virtual physiological human’ representations. When combined with population-scale numerical models, these models have the potential to reduce the cost, time and risk associated with clinical trials. The adoption of CFD modelling signals a new era in cardiovascular medicine. While potentially highly beneficial, a number of academic and commercial groups are addressing the associated methodological, regulatory, education- and service-related challenges.

[1]  A. Weyman,et al.  Validation of the proximal flow convergence method. Calculation of orifice area in patients with mitral stenosis. , 1993, Circulation.

[2]  J J Wentzel,et al.  Relationship Between Neointimal Thickness and Shear Stress After Wallstent Implantation in Human Coronary Arteries , 2001, Circulation.

[3]  F P T Baaijens,et al.  A three-dimensional computational analysis of fluid-structure interaction in the aortic valve. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  A. Tannenbaum,et al.  Flow Patterns and Wall Shear Stress Distributions at Atherosclerotic-Prone Sites in a Human Left Coronary Artery - An Exploration Using Combined Methods of CT and Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[5]  M J Fagan,et al.  A comparative study of aortic wall stress using finite element analysis for ruptured and non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2004, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[6]  D C Barber,et al.  Automatic segmentation of medical images using image registration: diagnostic and simulation applications , 2005, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[7]  Francesco Migliavacca,et al.  On the use of computational models for the quantitative assessment of surgery in congenital heart disease. , 2005, Anadolu kardiyoloji dergisi : AKD = the Anatolian journal of cardiology.

[8]  John F LaDisa,et al.  Alterations in wall shear stress predict sites of neointimal hyperplasia after stent implantation in rabbit iliac arteries. , 2005, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[9]  Fotis Sotiropoulos,et al.  Flow in Prosthetic Heart Valves: State-of-the-Art and Future Directions , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  S. Chien Mechanotransduction and endothelial cell homeostasis: the wisdom of the cell. , 2007, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[11]  Dimos Poulikakos,et al.  A study on the compliance of a right coronary artery and its impact on wall shear stress. , 2008, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[12]  Alejandro F Frangi,et al.  Reproducibility of haemodynamical simulations in a subject-specific stented aneurysm model--a report on the Virtual Intracranial Stenting Challenge 2007. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  Patient-specific modeling of cardiovascular mechanics. , 2009, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[14]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  On Coupling a Lumped Parameter Heart Model and a Three-Dimensional Finite Element Aorta Model , 2009, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Fotis Sotiropoulos,et al.  A review of state-of-the-art numerical methods for simulating flow through mechanical heart valves , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[16]  P. Davies,et al.  Hemodynamically Driven Stent Strut Design , 2009, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  M. Walsh,et al.  A computational study of the magnitude and direction of migration forces in patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysm stent-grafts. , 2010, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[18]  Uwe Siebert,et al.  Clinical ResearchInterventional CardiologyFractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: 2-Year Follow-Up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) Study , 2010 .

[19]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  AORTIC COARCTATION: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN EXPERIMENTAL AND COMPUTATIONAL METHODS TO ASSESS TREATMENTS FOR THIS SIMPLE CONDITION. , 2010, Progress in pediatric cardiology.

[20]  Fotis Sotiropoulos,et al.  Erratum to: Simulation of the Three-Dimensional Hinge Flow Fields of a Bileaflet Mechanical Heart Valve Under Aortic Conditions , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Gábor Janiga,et al.  Impact of stents and flow diverters on hemodynamics in idealized aneurysm models. , 2011, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[22]  Helko Lehmann,et al.  euHeart: personalized and integrated cardiac care using patient-specific cardiovascular modelling , 2011, Interface Focus.

[23]  Alejandro F Frangi,et al.  @neurIST complex information processing toolchain for the integrated management of cerebral aneurysms , 2011, Interface Focus.

[24]  Nikos Stergiopulos,et al.  Pulse Wave Propagation in the Arterial Tree , 2011 .

[25]  G. Plank,et al.  Length-dependent tension in the failing heart and the efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2011, Cardiovascular research.

[26]  Roy C. P. Kerckhoffs,et al.  Patient-specific modeling of dyssynchronous heart failure: a case study. , 2011, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[27]  Yubing Shi,et al.  Review of Zero-D and 1-D Models of Blood Flow in the Cardiovascular System , 2011, Biomedical engineering online.

[28]  Yannis Papaharilaou,et al.  Computational Evaluation of Aortic Aneurysm Rupture Risk: What Have We Learned So Far? , 2011, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[29]  P. Lawford,et al.  Importance of realistic LVAD profiles for assisted aortic simulations: evaluation of optimal outflow anastomosis locations , 2012, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[30]  Jürgen Weese,et al.  Generating anatomical models of the heart and the aorta from medical images for personalized physiological simulations , 2013, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[31]  Jeffrey A. Feinstein,et al.  Wall shear stress is decreased in the pulmonary arteries of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: An image-based, computational fluid dynamics study , 2012, Pulmonary circulation.

[32]  Patient-specific local and systemic haemodynamics in the presence of a left ventricular assist device , 2012 .

[33]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Patient-specific Electromechanical Models of the Heart for the Prediction of Pacing Acute Effects in Crt: a Preliminary Clinical Validation , 2022 .

[34]  Matteo Astorino,et al.  A robust and efficient valve model based on resistive immersed surfaces , 2012, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[35]  Francesco Migliavacca,et al.  Modeling Stented Coronary Arteries: Where We are, Where to Go , 2012, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  Jack Lee,et al.  The Multi-Scale Modelling of Coronary Blood Flow , 2012, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[37]  Philipp Beerbaum,et al.  Accuracy vs. computational time: translating aortic simulations to the clinic. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[38]  A. Gallagher,et al.  The future of simulation technologies for complex cardiovascular procedures. , 2012, European heart journal.

[39]  Yiannis Ventikos,et al.  A longitudinal study of Type-B aortic dissection and endovascular repair scenarios: computational analyses. , 2013, Medical engineering & physics.

[40]  Alfio Quarteroni,et al.  A vision and strategy for the virtual physiological human: 2012 update , 2013, Interface Focus.

[41]  Giampaolo Martufi,et al.  Review: the role of biomechanical modeling in the rupture risk assessment for abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2013, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[42]  Einly Lim,et al.  Review on CFD simulation in heart with dilated cardiomyopathy and myocardial infarction , 2013, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[43]  Steven Deutsch,et al.  Results of FDA’s First Interlaboratory Computational Study of a Nozzle with a Sudden Contraction and Conical Diffuser , 2013 .

[44]  Xianghua Xie,et al.  An Overview on Interactive Medical Image Segmentation , 2013 .

[45]  Giancarlo Pennati,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics models and congenital heart diseases , 2013, Front. Pediatr..

[46]  Shmuel Einav,et al.  Device thrombogenicity emulation: a novel methodology for optimizing the thromboresistance of cardiovascular devices. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[47]  Yiannis Ventikos,et al.  A patient-specific study of type-B aortic dissection: evaluation of true-false lumen blood exchange , 2013, Biomedical engineering online.

[48]  Patricia V Lawford,et al.  Virtual fractional flow reserve from coronary angiography: modeling the significance of coronary lesions: results from the VIRTU-1 (VIRTUal Fractional Flow Reserve From Coronary Angiography) study. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[49]  Claudio Chiastra,et al.  Patient-specific simulations of stenting procedures in coronary bifurcations: two clinical cases. , 2013, Medical engineering & physics.

[50]  M. Loebe,et al.  Computational Fluid Dynamics Investigation of Chronic Aortic Dissection Hemodynamics Versus Normal Aorta , 2013, Vascular and endovascular surgery.

[51]  Simon J. Sonntag,et al.  Combined Computational and Experimental Approach to Improve the Assessment of Mitral Regurgitation by Echocardiography , 2014, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[52]  M. Loebe,et al.  Review of recent results using computational fluid dynamics simulations in patients receiving mechanical assist devices for end-stage heart failure. , 2014, Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal.

[53]  William Wijns,et al.  Fractional flow reserve calculation from 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and TIMI frame count: a fast computer model to quantify the functional significance of moderately obstructed coronary arteries. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[54]  Shmuel Einav,et al.  Thromboresistance comparison of the HeartMate II ventricular assist device with the device thrombogenicity emulation- optimized HeartAssist 5 VAD. , 2014, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[55]  A Nchimi,et al.  A novel strategy to translate the biomechanical rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms to their equivalent diameter risk: method and retrospective validation. , 2014, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[56]  E. V. van Beek,et al.  Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Pulmonary Hypertension: A Practical Approach to the Current State of the Art , 2014, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[57]  A. Lungu,et al.  MRI model-based non-invasive differential diagnosis in pulmonary hypertension. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[58]  Giancarlo Pennati,et al.  A simulation protocol for exercise physiology in Fontan patients using a closed loop lumped-parameter model. , 2014, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[59]  Francesco Migliavacca,et al.  Errata: “A Simulation Protocol for Exercise Physiology in Fontan Patients Using a Closed Loop Lumped-Parameter Model” [Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 2014, 136(8), p. 081007, DOI:10.1115/1.4027271] , 2014 .

[60]  X. Y. Xu,et al.  Predicting flow in aortic dissection: comparison of computational model with PC-MRI velocity measurements. , 2014, Medical engineering & physics.

[61]  Y. Ventikos,et al.  Personalizing flow‐diverter intervention for cerebral aneurysms: from computational hemodynamics to biochemical modeling , 2014, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[62]  Hiroshi Ito,et al.  Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps). , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[63]  Mette S Olufsen,et al.  Numerical simulation of blood flow and pressure drop in the pulmonary arterial and venous circulation , 2014, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[64]  Michail I. Papafaklis,et al.  Fast virtual functional assessment of intermediate coronary lesions using routine angiographic data and blood flow simulation in humans: comparison with pressure wire - fractional flow reserve. , 2014, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[65]  Philippe Moireau,et al.  Identification of artery wall stiffness: in vitro validation and in vivo results of a data assimilation procedure applied to a 3D fluid-structure interaction model. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[66]  H. Tengg-Kobligk,et al.  Finite element analysis in asymptomatic, symptomatic, and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: in search of new rupture risk predictors. , 2015, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[67]  Patricia V. Lawford,et al.  “Virtual” (Computed) Fractional Flow Reserve , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[68]  H A Marquering,et al.  Additional Value of Intra-Aneurysmal Hemodynamics in Discriminating Ruptured versus Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms , 2015, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[69]  Jeffrey Mueller,et al.  Patient-specific computational modeling of blood flow in the pulmonary arterial circulation , 2015, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[70]  W P Donders,et al.  Personalization of models with many model parameters: an efficient sensitivity analysis approach. , 2015, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[71]  Patricia V. Lawford,et al.  “ Virtual ” (Computed) Fractional Flow Reserve Current Challenges and Limitations , 2017 .