Animals and Artifacts May Not Be Treated Equally: Differentiating Strong and Weak Forms of Category-Specific Visual Agnosia

We examined a categorical dissociation hypothesis of category-specific agnosia using hierarchical regression to predict the naming responses of three agnosia patients while controlling a wide variety of perceptual and conceptual between-category differences. The living-nonliving distinction remained a significant predictor for two of the patients after controlling for all the other factors. For one remaining patient, the categorical variable was not significant once the form-function correlation of different objects was controlled. We argue that the visual system may use various subprocesses at different stages, some of which reflect true categorical organization and some of which reflect a unitary feature-based system that distinguishes kinds.

[1]  David Gaffan,et al.  A Spurious Category-Specific Visual Agnosia for Living Things in Normal Human and Nonhuman Primates , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  M. Berry,et al.  Ultraviolet-induced cell death blocked by a selenoprotein from a human dermatotropic poxvirus. , 1998, Science.

[3]  E Capitani,et al.  Progressive language impairment without dementia: a case with isolated category specific semantic defect. , 1988, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[4]  F. Lucchelli,et al.  Are Semantic Systems Separately Represented in the Brain? The Case of Living Category Impairment , 1994, Cortex.

[5]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Discrete Cortical Regions Associated with Knowledge of Color and Knowledge of Action , 1995, Science.

[6]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge , 1996, Nature.

[7]  Michael J. Tarr Is human object recognition better described by geon structural description or by multiple views , 1995 .

[8]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  Of cabbages and things: Semantic memory from a neuropsychological perspective—A tutorial review. , 1994 .

[9]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  T. Shallice,et al.  Category specific semantic impairments , 1984 .

[11]  E. Warrington,et al.  Category specific access dysphasia. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[13]  L. Tyler,et al.  Functional Properties of Concepts: Studies of Normal and Brain-damaged Patients , 1997 .

[14]  S. Thorpe,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[15]  John Hart,et al.  Neural subsystems for object knowledge , 1992, Nature.

[16]  Richard J. Brown Neuropsychology Mental Structure , 1989 .

[17]  Randall J. Frank,et al.  Explaining category-related effects in the retrieval of conceptual and lexical knowledge for concrete entities: operationalization and analysis of factors , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Attention and Performance 15: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing , 1994 .

[19]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Cascade processes in picture identification , 1988 .

[20]  Martha J Farah,et al.  The Living/Nonliving Dissociation is Not an Artifact: Giving an A Priori Implausible Hypothesis a Strong Test. , 1996, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[21]  F. Keil,et al.  Efficient visual search by category: Specifying the features that mark the difference between artifacts and animals in preattentive vision , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The multiple semantics hypothesis: Multiple confusions? , 1990 .

[23]  M. Kurbat Can the recognition of living things really be selectively impaired? , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  A. Neuren Visual Agnosia , 1991, Neurology.

[25]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Domain-Specific Knowledge Systems in the Brain: The Animate-Inanimate Distinction , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  Rosaleen A. McCarthy,et al.  Multiple meaning systems in the brain: A case for visual semantics , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  E. Warrington,et al.  Categories of knowledge. Further fractionations and an attempted integration. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  Argye E. Hillis,et al.  Category-specific naming and comprehension impairment: a double dissociation , 1998 .

[29]  M. Farah,et al.  Can recognition of living things be selectively impaired , 1998 .

[30]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[31]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Calling a squirrel a squirrel but a canoe a wigwam: a category-specific deficit for artefactual objects and body parts , 1992 .

[32]  Elaine Funnell,et al.  Categories of knowledge? unfamiliar aspects of living and nonliving things , 1992 .

[33]  Edward H.F. de Haan,et al.  Category specificity in visual recognition , 1994 .

[34]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  What's lost in inverted faces? , 1993, Cognition.

[35]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  The Neuropsychology of high-level vision : collected tutorial essays , 1994 .

[36]  A J Parkin,et al.  Naming Impairments following Recovery from Herpes Simplex Encephalitis: Category-Specific? , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[37]  M J Tarr,et al.  Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  J D Gabrieli,et al.  Priming of visual and functional knowledge on a semantic classification task. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[39]  Martin Arguin,et al.  Shape Integration for Visual Object Recognition and Its Implication in Category-Specific Visual Agnosia , 1996 .

[40]  R Job,et al.  Category-Specific Naming Impairments? Yes , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[41]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Specialization within visual object recognition: Clues from prosopagnosia and alexia. , 1994 .