The Effects of Gene Recruitment on the Evolvability and Robustness of Pattern-Forming Gene Networks

Gene recruitment or co-option is defined as the placement of a new gene under a foreign regulatory system. Such re-arrangement of pre-existing regulatory networks can lead to an increase in genomic complexity. This reorganization is recognized as a major driving force in evolution. We simulated the evolution of gene networks by means of the Genetic Algorithms (GA) technique. We used standard GA methods of point mutation and multi-point crossover, as well as our own operators for introducing or withdrawing new genes on the network. The starting point for our computer evolutionary experiments was a 4-gene dynamic model representing the real genetic network controlling segmentation in the fruit fly Drosophila. Model output was fit to experimentally observed gene expression patterns in the early fly embryo. We compared this to output for networks with more and less genes, and with variation in maternal regulatory input. We found that the mutation operator, together with the gene introduction procedure, was sufficient for recruiting new genes into pre-existing networks. Reinforcement of the evolutionary search by crossover operators facilitates this recruitment, but is not necessary. Gene recruitment causes outgrowth of an evolving network, resulting in redundancy, in the sense that the number of genes goes up, as well as the regulatory interactions on the original genes. The recruited genes can have uniform or patterned expressions, many of which recapitulate gene patterns seen in flies, including genes which are not explicitly put in our model. Recruitment of new genes can affect the evolvability of networks (in general, their ability to produce the variation to facilitate adaptive evolution). We see A.V. Spirov ( ) Applied Mathematics and Statistics, and Center for Developmental Genetics, State University of New York, CMM Bldg, Rm481, South Loop, SUNY at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794-5140, USA e-mail: Alexander.Spirov@sunysb.edu D.M. Holloway Mathematics Department, British Columbia Institute of Technology, Burnaby, B.C., Canada, and with the Biology Department, University of Victoria, B.C., Canada e-mail: David Holloway@bcit.ca S.-I. Ao et al. (eds.), Advances in Computational Algorithms and Data Analysis, 29 Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering 14, c © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 30 A.V. Spirov and D.M. Holloway this in particular with a 2-gene subnetwork. To study robustness, we have subjected the networks to experimental levels of variability in maternal regulatory patterns. The majority of networks are not robust to these perturbations. However, a significant subset of the networks do display very high robustness. Within these networks, we find a variety of outcomes, with independent control of different gene expression boundaries. Increase in the number and connectivity of genes (redundancy) does not appear to correlate with robustness. Indeed, removal of recruited genes tends to give a worse fit to data than the original network; new genes are not freely disposable once they acquire functions in the network.

[1]  A. Wilkins The Evolution of Developmental Pathways , 2001 .

[2]  B C Goodwin,et al.  Spatial harmonics and pattern specification in early Drosophila development. Part II. The four colour wheels model. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  S. Kauffman,et al.  Spatial harmonics and pattern specification in early Drosophila development. Part I. Bifurcation sequences and gene expression. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  W. Bialek,et al.  Probing the Limits to Positional Information , 2007, Cell.

[5]  S. Leibler,et al.  Precise domain specification in the developing Drosophila embryo. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  David Kosman,et al.  Analysis of pattern precision shows that Drosophila segmentation develops substantial independence from gradients of maternal gene products , 2006, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[7]  R. L. Carroll Evolution of the capacity to evolve , 2002 .

[8]  L. Wolpert Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  Claude Desplan,et al.  Synergy between the hunchback and bicoid morphogens is required for anterior patterning in Drosophila , 1994, Cell.

[10]  David H. Sharp,et al.  Mechanism of eve stripe formation , 1995, Mechanisms of Development.

[11]  David H. Sharp,et al.  Canalization of Gene Expression and Domain Shifts in the Drosophila Blastoderm by Dynamical Attractors , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[12]  John Reinitz,et al.  A database for management of gene expression data in situ , 2004, Bioinform..

[13]  John Reinitz,et al.  Sharp borders from fuzzy gradients. , 2002, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[14]  David M. Holloway,et al.  Making the body plan: Precision in the genetic hierarchy of Drosophila embryo segmentation , 2003, Silico Biol..

[15]  Hans-Paul Schwefel,et al.  Numerical Optimization of Computer Models , 1982 .

[16]  B C Goodwin,et al.  Drosophila segmentation: supercomputer simulation of prepattern hierarchy. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  A. Wilkins,et al.  The evolution of 'bricolage'. , 1998, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[18]  Z Burstein A network model of developmental gene hierarchy. , 1995, Journal of theoretical biology.

[19]  David H. Sharp,et al.  Dynamic control of positional information in the early Drosophila embryo , 2004, Nature.

[20]  S. Leibler,et al.  Establishment of developmental precision and proportions in the early Drosophila embryo , 2002, Nature.

[21]  D. Thieffry,et al.  A logical analysis of the Drosophila gap-gene system. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  A. Wagner Distributed robustness versus redundancy as causes of mutational robustness. , 2005, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[23]  S. Carroll,et al.  Gene co-option in physiological and morphological evolution. , 2002, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[24]  M. Laubichler Review of: Carroll, Sean B., Jennifer K. Grenier and Scott D. Weatherbee: From DNA to diversity : molecular genetics and the evolution of animal design. Malden, Mass [u.a.]: Blackwell Science 2001 , 2003 .

[25]  E. Davidson Genomic Regulatory Systems: Development and Evolution , 2005 .

[26]  Manu,et al.  Characterization of the Drosophila segment determination morphome. , 2008, Developmental biology.

[27]  David H. Sharp,et al.  A connectionist model of development. , 1991, Journal of theoretical biology.

[28]  David H. Sharp,et al.  Dynamical Analysis of Regulatory Interactions in the Gap Gene System of Drosophila melanogaster , 2004, Genetics.

[29]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes , 1990 .

[30]  J. Gerhart,et al.  Evolution at Two Levels : On Genes and Form , 2005 .