Folding of multidomain proteins: Biophysical consequences of tethering even in apparently independent folding

Most eukaryotic and a substantial fraction of prokaryotic proteins are composed of more than one domain. The tethering of these evolutionary, structural, and functional units raises, among others, questions regarding the folding process of conjugated domains. Studying the folding of multidomain proteins in silico enables one to identify and isolate the tethering‐induced biophysical determinants that govern crosstalks generated between neighboring domains. For this purpose, we carried out coarse‐grained and atomistic molecular dynamics simulations of two two‐domain constructs from the immunoglobulin‐like β‐sandwich fold. Each of these was experimentally shown to behave as the “sum of its parts,” that is, the thermodynamic and kinetic folding behavior of the constituent domains of these constructs seems to occur independently, with the folding of each domain uncoupled from the folding of its partner in the two‐domain construct. We show that the properties of the individual domains can be significantly affected by conjugation to another domain. The tethering may be accompanied by stabilizing as well as destabilizing factors whose magnitude depends on the size of the interface, the length, and the flexibility of the linker, and the relative stability of the domains. Accordingly, the folding of a multidomain protein should not be viewed as the sum of the folding patterns of each of its parts, but rather, it involves abrogating several effects that lead to this outcome. An imbalance between these effects may result in either stabilization or destabilization owing to the tethering. Proteins 2012; © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Jane Clarke,et al.  Studying the folding of multidomain proteins , 2008, HFSP journal.

[2]  C. Khosla,et al.  Role of linkers in communication between protein modules. , 2000, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[3]  J. Janin,et al.  A dissection of specific and non-specific protein-protein interfaces. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  J. Clarke,et al.  Complex folding kinetics of a multidomain protein. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[5]  Eric J. Sorin,et al.  Exploring the helix-coil transition via all-atom equilibrium ensemble simulations. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[6]  S. Teichmann,et al.  Domain combinations in archaeal, eubacterial and eukaryotic proteomes. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  Jaime Prilusky,et al.  Automated analysis of interatomic contacts in proteins , 1999, Bioinform..

[8]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  P versus Q: structural reaction coordinates capture protein folding on smooth landscapes. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  E. Cota,et al.  Folding studies of immunoglobulin-like beta-sandwich proteins suggest that they share a common folding pathway. , 1999, Structure.

[10]  A. Pastore,et al.  The elastic I-band region of titin is assembled in a "modular" fashion by weakly interacting Ig-like domains. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Dynamic allostery: linkers are not merely flexible. , 2011, Structure.

[12]  A. Baumketner,et al.  Effects of surface tethering on protein folding mechanisms. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  J. King,et al.  Folding and stability of the isolated Greek key domains of the long‐lived human lens proteins γD‐crystallin and γS‐crystallin , 2007, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[14]  S. Teichmann,et al.  Supra-domains: evolutionary units larger than single protein domains. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  A. Baumketner,et al.  Stability of a protein tethered to a surface. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[16]  Jun Wang,et al.  Folding behavior of chaperonin‐mediated substrate protein , 2005, Proteins.

[17]  E. Paci,et al.  Mechanical unfolding of TNfn3: the unfolding pathway of a fnIII domain probed by protein engineering, AFM and MD simulation. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  J. Clarke,et al.  The effect of boundary selection on the stability and folding of the third fibronectin type III domain from human tenascin. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[19]  Alexander Schug,et al.  From protein folding to protein function and biomolecular binding by energy landscape theory. , 2010, Current opinion in pharmacology.

[20]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Quantitative criteria for native energetic heterogeneity influences in the prediction of protein folding kinetics , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Masaki Sasai,et al.  Cooperativity, connectivity, and folding pathways of multidomain proteins , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  W. Stites,et al.  Effects of excluded volume upon protein stability in covalently cross-linked proteins with variable linker lengths. , 2008, Biochemistry.

[23]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Minimum energy compact structures in force-quench polyubiquitin folding are domain swapped , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  A G Murzin,et al.  SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  KumarShankar,et al.  The weighted histogram analysis method for free-energy calculations on biomolecules. I , 1992 .

[26]  J. Clarke,et al.  Two Immunoglobulin Tandem Proteins with a Linking β-Strand Reveal Unexpected Differences in Cooperativity and Folding Pathways , 2012, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  S. Teichmann,et al.  The folding and evolution of multidomain proteins , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[28]  C. Post,et al.  Domain cooperativity in multidomain proteins: what can we learn from molecular alignment in anisotropic media? , 2011, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[29]  Yaakov Levy,et al.  Mutations as trapdoors to two competing native conformations of the Rop-dimer , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Osamu Miyashita,et al.  Conformational transitions of adenylate kinase: switching by cracking. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Overcoming residual frustration in domain-swapping: the roles of disulfide bonds in dimerization and aggregation , 2005, Physical biology.

[32]  M. Levitt Nature of the protein universe , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Shoji Takada,et al.  How protein thermodynamics and folding mechanisms are altered by the chaperonin cage: Molecular simulations , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  M. Blackledge Mapping the conformational mobility of multidomain proteins. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[35]  S. Teichmann,et al.  The importance of sequence diversity in the aggregation and evolution of proteins , 2005, Nature.

[36]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Theory of protein folding: the energy landscape perspective. , 1997, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[37]  José N Onuchic,et al.  Extracting function from a β-trefoil folding motif , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  C. Chothia,et al.  Structure, function and evolution of multidomain proteins. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.

[39]  A. Elofsson,et al.  Multi-domain proteins in the three kingdoms of life: orphan domains and other unassigned regions. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[40]  Jane Clarke,et al.  Single-molecule fluorescence reveals sequence-specific misfolding in multidomain proteins , 2011, Nature.

[41]  Samuel S. Cho,et al.  Domain swapping is a consequence of minimal frustration. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  J. Clarke,et al.  Titin; a multidomain protein that behaves as the sum of its parts. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[43]  C M Dobson,et al.  Effects of macromolecular crowding on protein folding and aggregation , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[44]  Joan-Emma Shea,et al.  The effect of surface tethering on the folding of the src-SH3 protein domain , 2009, Physical biology.

[45]  C. Chothia,et al.  The geometry of domain combination in proteins. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[46]  Wei Wang,et al.  Confinement effects on the kinetics and thermodynamics of protein dimerization , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Ronald D. Hills,et al.  Subdomain competition, cooperativity, and topological frustration in the folding of CheY. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[48]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Theory of Protein Folding This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Folding and Binding Edited Basic Concepts Perfect Funnel Landscapes and Common Features of Folding Mechanisms , 2022 .

[49]  Gottfried Köhler,et al.  Asymmetric effect of domain interactions on the kinetics of folding in yeast phosphoglycerate kinase , 2005, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[50]  Yaakov Levy,et al.  Simulations of proteins with inhomogeneous degrees of freedom: The effect of thermostats , 2008, J. Comput. Chem..

[51]  D. Klimov,et al.  Folding of tandem‐linked domains , 2007, Proteins.

[52]  Marek Cieplak,et al.  Mechanical stability of multidomain proteins and novel mechanical clamps , 2011, Proteins.

[53]  Crosstalk between the Protein Surface and Hydrophobic Core in a Core-swapped Fibronectin Type III Domain , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[54]  Gustavo Caetano-Anollés,et al.  The evolutionary mechanics of domain organization in proteomes and the rise of modularity in the protein world. , 2009, Structure.

[55]  J. Onuchic,et al.  An all‐atom structure‐based potential for proteins: Bridging minimal models with all‐atom empirical forcefields , 2009, Proteins.

[56]  B. Berne,et al.  Nanoscale dewetting transition in protein complex folding. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[57]  I D Campbell,et al.  Module-module interactions in the cell binding region of fibronectin: stability, flexibility and specificity. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[58]  Y. Levy,et al.  Folding of glycoproteins: toward understanding the biophysics of the glycosylation code. , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.

[59]  Tetsuya Yomo,et al.  Protein folding by the effects of macromolecular crowding , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[60]  Willy Wriggers,et al.  Control of protein functional dynamics by peptide linkers. , 2005, Biopolymers.

[61]  Yaakov Levy,et al.  Ubiquitin not only serves as a tag but also assists degradation by inducing protein unfolding , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  J. Lefèvre,et al.  The assembly of immunoglobulin-like modules in titin: implications for muscle elasticity. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[63]  M. Llinás,et al.  Conformational Dynamics and Ligand Binding in the Multi-Domain Protein PDC109 , 2010, PloS one.

[64]  R. Swendsen,et al.  THE weighted histogram analysis method for free‐energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method , 1992 .

[65]  Sarah A Teichmann,et al.  How do proteins gain new domains? , 2010, Genome Biology.

[66]  Y. Levy,et al.  Effect of glycosylation on protein folding: A close look at thermodynamic stabilization , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[67]  J. King,et al.  Folding and stability of the isolated Greek key domains of the long-lived human lens proteins gammaD-crystallin and gammaS-crystallin. , 2007, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[68]  Folding of Conjugated Proteins , 2010 .

[69]  Biophysical investigations of engineered polyproteins: implications for force data. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[70]  J. Clarke,et al.  Sequence conservation in Ig-like domains: the role of highly conserved proline residues in the fibronectin type III superfamily. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[71]  Gerrit Groenhof,et al.  GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[72]  Stella Veretnik,et al.  Toward consistent assignment of structural domains in proteins. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.