Robust network sensor location for complete link flow observability under uncertainty

The link observability problem is to identify the minimum set of links to be installed with sensors that allow the full determination of flows on all the unobserved links. Inevitably, the observed link flows are subject to measurement errors, which will accumulate and propagate in the inference of the unobserved link flows, leading to uncertainty in the inference process. In this paper, we develop a robust network sensor location model for complete link flow observability, while considering the propagation of measurement errors in the link flow inference. Our model development relies on two observations: (1) multiple sensor location schemes exist for the complete inference of the unobserved link flows, and different schemes can have different accumulated variances of the inferred flows as propagated from the measurement errors. (2) Fewer unobserved links involved in the nodal flow conservation equations will have a lower chance of accumulating measurement errors, and hence a lower uncertainty in the inferred link flows. These observations motivate a new way to formulate the sensor location problem. Mathematically, we formulate the problem as min–max and min–sum binary integer linear programs. The objective function minimizes the largest or cumulative number of unobserved links connected to each node, which reduces the chance of incurring higher variances in the inference process. Computationally, the resultant binary integer linear program permits the use of a number of commercial software packages for its globally optimal solution. Furthermore, considering the non-uniqueness of the minimum set of observed links for complete link flow observability, the optimization programs also consider a secondary criterion for selecting the sensor location scheme with the minimum accumulated uncertainty of the complete link flow inference.

[1]  L. Bianco,et al.  Combinatorial aspects of the sensor location problem , 2006, Ann. Oper. Res..

[2]  Anthony Chen,et al.  Norm approximation method for handling traffic count inconsistencies in path flow estimator , 2009 .

[3]  George F. List,et al.  An Information-Theoretic Sensor Location Model for Traffic Origin-Destination Demand Estimation Applications , 2010, Transp. Sci..

[4]  Anthony Chen,et al.  L-Norm Path Flow Estimator for Handling Traffic Count Inconsistencies: Formulation and Solution Algorithm , 2010 .

[5]  Michael G.H. Bell,et al.  The optimisation of traffic count locations in road networks , 2006 .

[6]  Hai Yang,et al.  Models and algorithms for road network design: a review and some new developments , 1998 .

[7]  Monica Gentili,et al.  Locating sensors on traffic networks: Models, challenges and research opportunities , 2012 .

[8]  Giuseppe Confessore,et al.  A Network Based Model for Traffic Sensor Location with Implications on O/D Matrix Estimates , 2001, Transp. Sci..

[9]  Ning Wang,et al.  Model to Locate Sensors for Estimation of Static Origin–Destination Volumes Given Prior Flow Information , 2012 .

[10]  ManWo Ng,et al.  Partial link flow observability in the presence of initial sensors: Solution without path enumeration , 2013 .

[11]  Srinivas Peeta,et al.  Identification of vehicle sensor locations for link-based network traffic applications , 2009 .

[12]  Fulvio Simonelli,et al.  A network sensor location procedure accounting for o–d matrix estimate variability , 2012 .

[13]  Shing Chung Josh Wong,et al.  Transport Network Design Problem under Uncertainty: A Review and New Developments , 2011 .

[14]  Manwo Ng Synergistic sensor location for link flow inference without path enumeration: A node-based approach , 2012 .

[15]  Wilfred W. Recker,et al.  Improved Path Flow Estimator for Origin-Destination Trip Tables , 2005 .

[16]  Anthony Chen,et al.  Confidence interval estimation for path flow estimator , 2011 .

[17]  Anthony Chen,et al.  Examining the Quality of Synthetic Origin-Destination Trip Table Estimated by Path Flow Estimator , 2005 .

[18]  Alois Knoll,et al.  Information Maximizing Optimal Sensor Placement Robust Against Variations of Traffic Demand Based on Importance of Nodes , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[19]  Anthony Chen,et al.  Identification of Network Sensor Locations for Estimation of Traffic Flow , 2014 .

[20]  Anthony Chen,et al.  STRATEGIES FOR SELECTING ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC COUNTS FOR IMPROVING O-D TRIP TABLE ESTIMATION , 2007 .

[21]  W. Y. Szeto,et al.  A State-of-the-Art Review of the Sensor Location, Flow Observability, Estimation, and Prediction Problems in Traffic Networks , 2015, J. Sensors.

[22]  Enrique F. Castillo,et al.  Optimal Use of Plate-Scanning Resources for Route Flow Estimation in Traffic Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[23]  Shengxue He A graphical approach to identify sensor locations for link flow inference , 2013 .

[24]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  Structural analysis of near-optimal sensor locations for a stochastic large-scale network , 2011 .

[25]  Pravin Varaiya,et al.  Measuring Traffic , 2008, 0804.2982.

[26]  David K. Smith Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications , 1994 .

[27]  Hai Yang,et al.  An analysis of the reliability of an origin-destination trip matrix estimated from traffic counts , 1991 .

[28]  Anthony Chen,et al.  Multiobjective Model for Locating Automatic Vehicle Identification Readers , 2004 .

[29]  Hong Kam Lo,et al.  Non-planar hole-generated networks and link flow observability based on link counters , 2014 .

[30]  Enrique Castillo,et al.  Observability of traffic networks. Optimal location of counting and scanning devices , 2013 .

[31]  H J Payne,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING OF INCIDENT DETECTION ALGORITHMS, VOLUME 2: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY AND DETAILED RESULTS , 1976 .

[32]  Enrique F. Castillo,et al.  Matrix Tools for General Observability Analysis in Traffic Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[33]  Enrique Castillo,et al.  Trip matrix and path flow reconstruction and estimation based on plate scanning and link observations , 2008 .

[34]  Enrique Castillo,et al.  Optimal traffic plate scanning location for OD trip matrix and route estimation in road networks , 2010 .

[35]  Yueyue Fan,et al.  Data dependent input control for origin–destination demand estimation using observability analysis , 2015 .

[36]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  Nonlinear multiobjective optimization , 1998, International series in operations research and management science.

[37]  Pitu B. Mirchandani,et al.  Sensor Location Model to Optimize Origin–Destination Estimation with a Bayesian Statistical Procedure , 2013 .

[38]  Anthony Chen,et al.  A BI-OBJECTIVE TRAFFIC COUNTING LOCATION PROBLEM FOR ORIGIN-DESTINATION TRIP TABLE ESTIMATION , 2005 .

[39]  Francesco Corman,et al.  Assessing partial observability in network sensor location problems , 2014 .

[40]  Anthony Chen,et al.  Scenario-based multi-objective AVI reader location models under different travel demand patterns , 2010 .

[41]  Enrique F. Castillo,et al.  Deriving the Upper Bound of the Number of Sensors Required to Know All Link Flows in a Traffic Network , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[42]  Chao Yang,et al.  Models and algorithms for the screen line-based traffic-counting location problems , 2006, Comput. Oper. Res..

[43]  Francesco Corman,et al.  A Null-Space metric for the analysis of partial network observability in sensor location problems , 2013 .

[44]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  Sensor Coverage and Location for Real-Time Traffic Prediction in Large-Scale Networks , 2007 .

[45]  Hai Yang,et al.  Optimal traffic counting locations for origin–destination matrix estimation , 1998 .