Learning Graph Model for Different Dimensions Image Matching

Hyperspectral imagery has been widely used in real applications such as remote sensing, agriculture, surveillance, and geological analysis. Matching hyperspectral images is a challenge task due to the high dimensional nature of the data. The matching task becomes more difficult when images with different dimensions, such as a hyperspectral image and an RGB image, have to be matched. In this paper, we address this problem by investigating structured support vector machine to learn graph model for each type of image. The graph model incorporates both low-level features and stable correspondences within images. The inherent characteristics are depicted by using graph matching algorithm on weighted graph models. We validate the effectiveness of our method through experiments on matching hyperspectral images to RGB images, and hyperspectral images with different dimensions.

[1]  Raffaella Fontana,et al.  2D imaging and 3D sensing data acquisition and mutual registration for painting conservation , 2005 .

[2]  Jianbo Shi,et al.  Balanced Graph Matching , 2006, NIPS.

[3]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[4]  Marcello Pelillo,et al.  A unifying framework for relational structure matching , 1998, Proceedings. Fourteenth International Conference on Pattern Recognition (Cat. No.98EX170).

[5]  Martial Hebert,et al.  A spectral technique for correspondence problems using pairwise constraints , 2005, Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1.

[6]  Alexander J. Smola,et al.  Learning Graph Matching , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[7]  Minsu Cho,et al.  Reweighted Random Walks for Graph Matching , 2010, ECCV.

[8]  Roger L. Easton,et al.  Multispectral imaging of the Archimedes palimpsest , 2003, 32nd Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop, 2003. Proceedings..

[9]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF) , 2008, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[10]  Thomas Hofmann,et al.  Large Margin Methods for Structured and Interdependent Output Variables , 2005, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[11]  G LoweDavid,et al.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2004 .

[12]  Martial Hebert,et al.  An Integer Projected Fixed Point Method for Graph Matching and MAP Inference , 2009, NIPS.

[13]  Shree K. Nayar,et al.  Generalized Assorted Pixel Camera: Postcapture Control of Resolution, Dynamic Range, and Spectrum , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[14]  Sajid Saleem,et al.  A Performance Evaluation of SIFT and SURF for Multispectral Image Matching , 2012, ICIAR.

[15]  Miguel Velez-Reyes,et al.  A vector SIFT operator for interest point detection in hyperspectral imagery , 2010, 2010 2nd Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing.

[16]  Nicolas Papadakis,et al.  A novel hyper-spectral imaging apparatus for the non-destructive analysis of objects of artistic and historic value , 2003 .

[17]  Jean Ponce,et al.  Learning Graphs to Match , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[18]  Sajid Saleem,et al.  A Modified SIFT Descriptor for Image Matching under Spectral Variations , 2013, ICIAP.

[19]  Robert Sablatnig,et al.  Multi-Spectral Image Acquisition and Registration of Ancient Manuscripts , 2007 .

[20]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Scale & Affine Invariant Interest Point Detectors , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[21]  Philip H. S. Torr,et al.  Efficient online structured output learning for keypoint-based object tracking , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[22]  Miguel Velez-Reyes,et al.  Interest Points for Hyperspectral Image Data , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.