Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension.

Event-related potentials and eye tracking were used to investigate the nature of priming effects in sentence comprehension. Participants read 2 sentences (a prime sentence and a target sentence), both of which had a difficult and ambiguous sentence structure. The prime and target sentences contained either the same verb or verbs that were very close in meaning. Priming effects were robust when the verb was repeated. In the event-related potential experiment, the amplitude of the P600 was reduced in target sentences that followed prime sentences with the same verb but not in prime sentences with a synonymous verb. In the eye-tracking experiment, total reading times on the disambiguating region were reduced when the targets followed prime sentences with the same verb but not when targets followed prime sentences with a synonymous verb. The fact that verb overlap greatly boosted priming effects in reduced relative sentences may indicate that verb argument structures play an important role in online parsing.

[1]  Andrew J. Stewart,et al.  Syntactic priming: Investigating the mental representation of language , 1995 .

[2]  Holly P Branigan,et al.  Priming prepositional-phrase attachment during comprehension. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[4]  Kristen M. Tooley,et al.  Priming in sentence comprehension: Strategic or syntactic? , 2008 .

[5]  A D Friederici,et al.  Syntactic parsing as revealed by brain responses: First-pass and second-pass parsing processes , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[6]  Gregory B. Simpson,et al.  Understanding word and sentence , 1991 .

[7]  J. Snedeker,et al.  Syntactic priming during language comprehension in three- and four-year-old children , 2008 .

[8]  M Besson,et al.  The many facets of repetition: a cued-recall and event-related potential analysis of repeating words in same versus different sentence contexts. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  P. Holcomb.  Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[10]  Frank Rösler,et al.  Different Anaphoric Expressions Are Investigated by Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2004, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[11]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Language-Related ERPs: Scalp Distributions and Modulation by Word Type and Semantic Priming , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  A. Szentkuti,et al.  Differences in brain potentials to open and closed class words: class and frequency effects , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Electrophysiological Signatures of Visual Lexical Processing: Open-and Closed-Class Words , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  Cyma Van Petten,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for the flexibility of lexical processing , 1991 .

[15]  M. Pickering,et al.  The Representation of Verbs: Evidence from Syntactic Priming in Language Production , 1998 .

[16]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  Context-sensitive neural responses to conflict resolution: Electrophysiological evidence from subject–object ambiguities in language comprehension , 2006, Brain Research.

[17]  D. Swinney,et al.  Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  J. K. Bock.  Syntactic persistence in language production , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  Christoph Scheepers,et al.  Priming ditransitive structures in comprehension , 2007, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Right hemisphere sensitivity to word- and sentence-level context: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2005, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition.

[21]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[22]  L. Osterhout,et al.  The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2005 .

[23]  B. McElree,et al.  Multi-dimensional contributions to garden path strength: Dissociating phrase structure from case marking , 2004 .

[24]  K. Rayner,et al.  The psychology of reading , 1989 .

[25]  M. Traxler,et al.  Syntactic Priming in Comprehension , 2007, Psychological science.

[26]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[28]  Julie E. Boland,et al.  Lexical constraints and prepositional phrase attachment , 1998 .

[29]  John C J Hoeks,et al.  Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[30]  Jacques Mehler,et al.  Role of surface and base structure in the perception of sentences , 1967 .

[31]  Gina R. Kuperberg,et al.  Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax , 2007, Brain Research.

[32]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[33]  C. Clifton,et al.  The independence of syntactic processing , 1986 .

[34]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  Parsing of Garden-path Sentences with Reciprocal Verbs , 1997 .

[35]  L Frazier,et al.  Processing Coordinate Structures , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[36]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  ON COMPREHENDING SENTENCES: SYNTACTIC PARSING STRATEGIES. , 1979 .

[37]  P. Gordon,et al.  The interplay of discourse congruence and lexical association during sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs and eye tracking. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.

[38]  Allison Blodgett,et al.  Argument Status and PP-Attachment , 2006, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[39]  Jacques Mehler,et al.  The interaction of veracity and syntax in the processing of sentences1 , 1968 .

[40]  Douglas Saddy,et al.  Distinct Neurophysiological Patterns Reflecting Aspects of Syntactic Complexity and Syntactic Repair , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[41]  Thomas G. Bever,et al.  Judging the veracity of ambiguous sentences. , 1970 .

[42]  J. Trueswell,et al.  How to Prune a Garden Path by Nipping It in the Bud: Fast Priming of Verb Argument Structure , 1998 .

[43]  A. Friederici,et al.  Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: early and late event-related brain potential effects. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[44]  Christoph Scheepers,et al.  Constituent order priming from reading to listening: a visual-world study , 2004 .

[45]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  A Parallel Architecture perspective on language processing , 2007, Brain Research.

[46]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .

[47]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  The Processing Nature of the N400: Evidence from Masked Priming , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  Richard Shillcock,et al.  The On-line Study of Sentence Comprehension , 2004 .

[49]  G. Kempen,et al.  Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: a computational model based on competitive inhibition and a lexicalist grammar , 2000, Cognition.

[50]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing , 1993 .

[51]  D. Dooling,et al.  Rhythm and syntax in sentence perception , 1974 .

[52]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  The use of lexical and syntactic information in language production: Evidence from the priming of noun-phrase structure , 2003 .

[53]  H. Kolk,et al.  Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials , 2003, Brain and Language.

[54]  M. Kutas,et al.  An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[55]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  Parallel constraint-based generative theories of language , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[56]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Book Reviews: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and German in Head-driven Phrase-structure Grammar , 1996, CL.

[57]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[58]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  The use of thematic role information in parsing: Syntactic processing autonomy revisited , 2003 .

[59]  E. Kaan,et al.  Repair, Revision, and Complexity in Syntactic Analysis: An Electrophysiological Differentiation , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[60]  D. Caplan,et al.  Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[61]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Working Memory Capacity Dissociates Lexical and Sentential Context Effects , 1997 .

[62]  C. J. Price,et al.  An fMRI Study of Syntactic Adaptation , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[63]  Matthew J Traxler,et al.  Lexically independent priming in online sentence comprehension , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[64]  Matthew J. Traxler,et al.  Structural priming among prepositional phrases: Evidence from eye movements , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[65]  Kristen M. Tooley,et al.  Lexical mediation and context effects in sentence processing , 2007, Brain Research.