Inhibitory surrounds of motion mechanisms revealed by continuous tracking.

Continuous psychophysics is a newly developed technique that allows rapid estimation of visual thresholds by asking subjects to track a moving object, then deriving the integration window underlying tracking behavior (Bonnen, Burge, Yates, Pillow, & Cormack, 2015). Leveraging the continuous flow of stimuli and responses, continuous psychophysics allows for estimation of psychophysical thresholds in as little as 1 min. To date this technique has been applied only to tracking visual objects, where it has been used to measure localization thresholds. Here we adapt the technique to visual motion discrimination, by displaying a drifting grating that changes direction on a binary random walk and asking participants to continuously report drift direction by alternate key press. This technique replicates and confirms well-known findings of the motion-perception system. It also proves particularly valuable in demonstrating induced motion, reinforcing evidence for the existence of antagonistic surround fields. At low contrasts, the surround summates with the center, rather than opposing it, again consistent with existing evidence on classical techniques. The user-friendliness and efficiency of the method may lend it to clinical and developmental work.

[1]  James M. G. Tsui,et al.  Brief motion stimuli preferentially activate surround-suppressed neurons in macaque visual area MT , 2008, Current Biology.

[2]  Elisa Castaldi,et al.  Numerosity but not texture-density discrimination correlates with math ability in children. , 2016, Developmental psychology.

[3]  K. Naka,et al.  S‐potentials from luminosity units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae) , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Fine Temporal Properties of Center–Surround Interactions in Motion Revealed by Reverse Correlation , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  D. Hubel,et al.  Extent of recovery from the effects of visual deprivation in kittens. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Perceptual consequences of centre–surround antagonism in visual motion processing , 2003, Nature.

[7]  K. Nakayama,et al.  A Velocity Analogue of Brightness Contrast , 1973, Perception.

[8]  Johannes Burge,et al.  Continuous psychophysics: Target-tracking to measure visual sensitivity. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[9]  K. Duncker,et al.  Über induzierte Bewegung , 1929 .

[10]  H. Barlow Critical limiting factors in the design of the eye and visual cortex , 1981 .

[11]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[12]  D. Levi,et al.  Receptive versus perceptive fields from the reverse-correlation viewpoint , 2006, Vision Research.

[13]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[14]  H. K. Hartline,et al.  THE RECEPTIVE FIELDS OF OPTIC NERVE FIBERS , 1940 .

[15]  A. Ahumada Perceptual Classification Images from Vernier Acuity Masked by Noise , 1996 .

[16]  Stuart Anstis,et al.  Induced movement: the flying bluebottle illusion. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[17]  Richard F Murray,et al.  Optimal methods for calculating classification images: weighted sums. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[18]  J A Solomon,et al.  Texture interactions determine perceived contrast , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Lawrence K. Cormack,et al.  Reflexive and voluntary control of smooth eye movements , 2013, Electronic Imaging.

[20]  J Allman,et al.  Direction- and Velocity-Specific Responses from beyond the Classical Receptive Field in the Middle Temporal Visual Area (MT) , 1985, Perception.

[21]  Christopher C. Pack,et al.  Contrast sensitivity of MT receptive field centers and surrounds. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.