Palliative treatment directives for bone metastases: A quality-directed approach to guiding institutional practice.

188 Background: The efficacy of single fraction (fx) radiation treatment (RT) has proven to have equipoise for palliation of bone metastases when compared to courses of 10 fx or more. Despite these data, there has been a slow adoption of this practice in the US and worldwide. Examination of our multicenter practice from 2004 - 2016 showed that single fx RT utilization has remained at 17% and hypofractionationed (HFX) courses (1 or 5 fx) have remained at 71% since 2009. We hypothesized that evidence-based, treatment-guiding directives could improve HFX utilization in this population. METHODS Institutionally, palliative bone metastasis treatments are routinely tracked by a Quality Assurance committee. In 2/2016, two consensus-driven and evidence-based clinical directives were created within our electronic health system for use with either simple or complicated bone metastasis, irrespective of primary histology. The simple and complex directives had default prescriptions of 8 Gy/1fx or 20 Gy/5fx, respectively. The directives were reviewed with physician staff to improve compliance; directives were allowed to be edited at the physician's discretion if an alternative fx was indicated. The chi-square test was used for analysis. RESULTS From 1/2009-5/2016, there were 1,781 treatment courses of palliative external beam RT. Following implementation in 2/2016, the new clinical directives were used for 96% of cases and were modified in 12 cases (n = 72). Single fx use increased from 17% to 36% among palliative bone metastasis treatments (p ≤ 0.001) and HFX (1 or 5 fx) utilization increased from 71% to 92% compared to other fractionation schemes (10 fx or other) (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The institution-wide adoption of evidence-based, treatment directives proved to be a straightforward and successful intervention which allowed for rapid adoption and increased utilization of the standard of care. Our early data suggests that this may be a useful approach in the setting of reticence to new treatment paradigms. Further examination of evidence based directives is warranted to address issues of overtreatment in palliation and in standardizing oncologic care.