Enhancing catalyst effectiveness by increasing catalyst film thickness in coated-wall microreactors: Exploiting heat effects in catalytic methane steam micro-reformers

Abstract The potential for increasing endothermic reforming process capacity of a heat-exchanger microreactor without compromising thermal or catalyst efficiency via employing unconventionally-thick catalyst washcoatings is investigated. This is achievable through exploiting the “internal” heating of the catalyst film, i.e. existence of a non-zero heat flux at the wall-catalyst interface at the inner boundary of the film, which is a characteristic of the heat-exchanger microreactor design. Classical one-dimensional analysis of non-isothermal reaction and diffusion in an internally-heated catalyst film identifies minimum values for Prater Temperature and dimensionless activation energy required for internal accumulation of applied heat to be effectively utilized. Under such conditions, analysis confirms the existence of a range of Thiele Moduli, or catalyst film thicknesses, corresponding to complete utilization of internally-supplied heat at catalyst effectiveness greater than unity. Subsequent application of these design rules to a previously validated computational fluid dynamic (CFD) model of an industrial annular micro-channel reformer (AMR) for methane steam reforming confirm that increasing catalyst film thicknesses to values corresponding to Thiele Modulus greater than unity enables intensification of the microreactor performance via increasing reforming capacity while maintaining equivalent thermal efficiency and retaining competitive catalyst effectivenesses.

[1]  Steve Perry,et al.  Microchannel Process Technology for Compact Methane Steam Reforming , 2004 .

[2]  Jacob A. Moulijn,et al.  Monoliths in Heterogeneous Catalysis , 1994 .

[3]  Yong Wang,et al.  From seconds to milliseconds to microseconds through tailored microchannel reactor design of a steam methane reformer , 2007 .

[4]  Jacques Mettes,et al.  Radial Microchannel Reactors (RMRs) for Efficient and Compact Steam Reforming of Methane: Experimental Demonstration and Design Simulations , 2013 .

[5]  James J. Carberry,et al.  The catalytic effectiveness factor under nonisothermal conditions , 1961 .

[6]  D. Vlachos,et al.  Enhancing stability in parallel plate microreactor stacks for syngas production , 2011 .

[7]  Dionisios G. Vlachos,et al.  Intensification of steam reforming of natural gas: Choosing combustible fuel and reforming catalyst , 2010 .

[8]  Michael Baldea,et al.  Pseudodistributed Feed Configurations for Catalytic Plate Microchannel Reactors , 2014 .

[9]  Michael Baldea,et al.  Optimizing the catalyst distribution for countercurrent methane steam reforming in plate reactors , 2011 .

[10]  E. W. Thiele Relation between Catalytic Activity and Size of Particle , 1939 .

[11]  G. Froment,et al.  Methane steam reforming, methanation and water‐gas shift: I. Intrinsic kinetics , 1989 .

[12]  Yongchan Kim,et al.  Minimization of hot spot in a microchannel reactor for steam reforming of methane with the stripe combustion catalyst layer , 2013 .

[13]  Ho Ting Luk,et al.  Techno-economic Analysis of Distributed Hydrogen Production from Natural Gas , 2012 .

[14]  J. Carberry The micro‐macro effectiveness factor for the reversible catalytic reaction , 1962 .

[15]  Yi Cheng,et al.  Catalytic performance of Ni catalysts for steam reforming of methane at high space velocity , 2011 .

[16]  Rutherford Aris,et al.  On shape factors for irregular particles—I: The steady state problem. Diffusion and reaction , 1995 .

[17]  Michael Baldea,et al.  A thermal‐flywheel approach to distributed temperature control in microchannel reactors , 2013 .

[18]  Iftekhar A. Karimi,et al.  Evaluation of utilization alternatives for stranded natural gas , 2012 .

[19]  Mustafa Karakaya,et al.  Parametric study of methane steam reforming to syngas in a catalytic microchannel reactor , 2012 .

[20]  B. Wilhite,et al.  Influence of internal heat removal upon effectiveness, stability of an exothermic catalytic film: Implications for process intensification , 2012 .

[21]  Yi Cheng,et al.  Steam reforming of methane over Ni catalyst in micro-channel reactor , 2011 .

[22]  Michael Baldea,et al.  Robust autothermal microchannel reactors , 2015, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[23]  M. Balat Potential importance of hydrogen as a future solution to environmental and transportation problems , 2008 .

[24]  Milorad P. Dudukovic,et al.  Recuperative coupling of exothermic and endothermic reactions , 2006 .

[25]  Ravi Arora,et al.  Microchannel Technology Scale-up to Commercial Capacity , 2005 .

[26]  M J Economides,et al.  THE ECONOMICS OF GAS TO LIQUIDS COMPARED TO LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS , 2005 .

[27]  Dionisios G. Vlachos,et al.  Scale-out of Microreactor Stacks for Portable and Distributed Processing: Coupling of Exothermic and Endothermic Processes for Syngas Production , 2010 .

[28]  J. Andrews,et al.  Re-envisioning the role of hydrogen in a sustainable energy economy , 2012 .

[29]  J. Carberry,et al.  The non-isothermal catalytic effectiveness factor for monolith supported catalysts , 1973 .

[30]  Jacques Mettes,et al.  Design of an annular microchannel reactor (AMR) for hydrogen and/or syngas production via methane steam reforming , 2014 .

[31]  C. Satterfield,et al.  Effectiveness Factor for Porous Catalysts. Langmuir-Hinshelwood Kinetic Expressions , 1965 .

[32]  George Leckie,et al.  Stranded gas: a vital resource , 2002 .

[33]  Dionisios G. Vlachos,et al.  High vs. low temperature reforming for hydrogen production via microtechnology , 2009 .