Contrast discrimination in peripheral vision.

Contrast discrimination provides a psychophysical method for studying contrast coding in vision. Our purpose was to compare properties of contrast discrimination in central and peripheral vision. We used forced-choice procedures to measure contrast-increment thresholds as a function of pedestal contrast. Our stimuli were 2-cycle/deg Gaussian-windowed sine-wave grating patches. They were centered at retinal loci ranging from 10 degrees nasal to 20 degrees temporal on the horizontal meridian. At each eccentricity, curves relating increment threshold to pedestal contrast had the same shape. When increment thresholds and pedestal contrasts were both normalized by the contrast thresholds at the retinal eccentricity in question, the curves became superimposed and fell along the same dipper-shaped contrast-discrimination function. We conclude that, after scaling by the local contrast sensitivity, properties of contrast discrimination are qualitatively and quantitatively similar from 0 degree to 20 degrees on the retina. These findings suggest that mechanisms of contrast coding are similar in central and peripheral vision.

[1]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Contrast matching data predicted from contrast increment thresholds , 1984, Vision Research.

[2]  R. Shapley.  The importance of contrast for the activity of single neurons, the vep and perception , 1986, Vision Research.

[3]  M. Cannon,et al.  Perceived contrast in the fovea and periphery. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[4]  S. Klein,et al.  Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification , 1985, Vision Research.

[5]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Contrast constancy: deblurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—II. Low vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[7]  J. Robson,et al.  Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field , 1981, Vision Research.

[8]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  G. Legge.  Spatial frequency masking in human vision: binocular interactions. , 1979, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[10]  S. Klein,et al.  Spatial frequency channels in human vision as asymmetric (edge) mechanisms. , 1974, Vision research.

[11]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Contrast masking in human vision. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[12]  H. Wilson,et al.  Threshold visibility of frequency gradient patterns , 1977, Vision Research.

[13]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  A power law for perceived contrast in human vision , 1981, Vision Research.

[14]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Binocular contrast summation—II. Quadratic summation , 1984, Vision Research.

[15]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Binocular contrast summation—I. Detection and discrimination , 1984, Vision Research.

[16]  G. Legge.  A power law for contrast discrimination , 1981, Vision Research.

[17]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  A comparison of contrast detection and discrimination , 1986, Vision Research.

[18]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Striate cortex of monkey and cat: contrast response function. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  J Nachmias,et al.  Letter: Grating contrast: discrimination may be better than detection. , 1974, Vision research.

[20]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Eccentricity dependence of contrast matching and oblique masking , 1985, Vision Research.

[21]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Light and dark bars; contrast discrimination , 1983, Vision Research.

[22]  G. Westheimer.  The spatial grain of the perifoveal visual field , 1982, Vision Research.