Comparison of variance components for test-day electrical conductivity of milk and test-day somatic cell score for first lactation cows in an experimental herd

In recent decades, electrical conductivity (EC) has been introduced as an indicator of mastitis, and genetic selection based on this trait may be possible. In this study, genetic parameters for test-day EC and test-day somatic cell score (SCS) were compared. Data were collected from a Danish experimental herd, including daily records of EC and SCS from 265 first lactation cows. Different genetic models were tested, and a random regression animal model with a 4th order Legendre polynomial for the permanent environmental effect for both traits, a 1st order Legendre polynomial for the additive genetic effect of EC and a 2nd order Legendre polynomial for the additive genetic effect of SCS, gave the best fit. The patterns of the curves were similar for both permanent environmental and additive genetic variance for the two traits. Heritability estimates ranged from 0.05 to 0.12, and from 0.01 to 0.09, for EC and SCS, respectively. The estimate of genetic correlation between the traits was high, and ranged from 0.86 to 0.98. Based on these results, EC could be a potential indicator trait in a breeding programme where selection for increased mastitis resistance is included.

[1]  P. Madsen,et al.  Genetic parameters for test-day electrical conductivity of milk for first-lactation cows from random regression models. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  H Hogeveen,et al.  Electrical conductivity of milk: ability to predict mastitis status. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  J. Jensen,et al.  Genetic analysis of somatic cell score in Norwegian cattle using random regression test-day models. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  Michael C. Petty,et al.  Effect of composition on the electrical conductance of milk , 2003 .

[5]  P. López-Romero,et al.  Comparing alternative random regression models to analyse first lactation daily milk yield data in Holstein–Friesian cattle , 2003 .

[6]  R. Mrode,et al.  Estimation of genetic parameters for somatic cell count in the first three lactations using random regression , 2003 .

[7]  J. Jensen,et al.  Influence of breed, parity, and stage of lactation on lactational performance and relationship between body fatness and live weight , 2003 .

[8]  M. Nielen,et al.  Low somatic cell count: a risk factor for subsequent clinical mastitis in a dairy herd. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  D. Boichard,et al.  Relationship of early first lactation somatic cell count with risk of subsequent first clinical mastitis , 2000 .

[10]  C. McCulloch,et al.  Effects of clinical mastitis on milk yield in dairy cows. , 1999, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  M. Lund,et al.  Estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters for clinical mastitis, somatic cell production deviance, and protein yield in dairy cattle using Gibbs sampling. , 1999, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  M. Goddard,et al.  The use of covariance functions and random regressions for genetic evaluation of milk production based on test day records. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.

[13]  G. Banos,et al.  Genetic correlations among somatic cell scores, productive life, and type traits from the United States and udder health measures from Denmark and Sweden. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  Alfonso Zecconi,et al.  Evaluation of the electrical conductivity of milk as a mastitis indicator , 1998 .

[15]  Raphael Mrode,et al.  Genetic and statistical properties of somatic cell count and its suitability as an indirect means of reducing the incidence of mastitis in dairy cattle , 1996 .

[16]  B. Berglund,et al.  Somatic cell count as a selection criterion for mastitis resistance in dairy cattle , 1995 .

[17]  Robin Thompson,et al.  Restricted Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Variance Components for Univariate Animal Models Using Sparse Matrix Techniques and Average Information , 1995 .

[18]  E. B. Burnside,et al.  Genetic relationships between clinical mastitis, somatic cell count, and udder conformation in Danish Holsteins , 1994 .

[19]  B. Mallard,et al.  Genetic impact on the risk of intramammary infection following Staphylococcus aureus challenge. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  D. Shuster,et al.  Factors affecting milk somatic cells and their role in health of the bovine mammary gland. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  W. E. Vinson,et al.  Potential of somatic cell concentration in milk as a sire selection criterion to reduce mastitis in dairy cattle. , 1986, Journal of dairy science.

[22]  B J Kitchen,et al.  Bovine mastitis: milk compositional changes and related diagnostic tests , 1981, Journal of Dairy Research.

[23]  G. Schwarz.  Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[24]  J. G. Rowell,et al.  Electrical conductivity of foremilk for detecting subclinical mastitis in cows , 1974, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[25]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[26]  J. H. Coste,et al.  The electrical conductivity of milk , 1919 .