Estimating and modelling cure in population-based cancer studies within the framework of flexible parametric survival models

BackgroundWhen the mortality among a cancer patient group returns to the same level as in the general population, that is, the patients no longer experience excess mortality, the patients still alive are considered "statistically cured". Cure models can be used to estimate the cure proportion as well as the survival function of the "uncured". One limitation of parametric cure models is that the functional form of the survival of the "uncured" has to be specified. It can sometimes be hard to find a survival function flexible enough to fit the observed data, for example, when there is high excess hazard within a few months from diagnosis, which is common among older age groups. This has led to the exclusion of older age groups in population-based cancer studies using cure models.MethodsHere we have extended the flexible parametric survival model to incorporate cure as a special case to estimate the cure proportion and the survival of the "uncured". Flexible parametric survival models use splines to model the underlying hazard function, and therefore no parametric distribution has to be specified.ResultsWe have compared the fit from standard cure models to our flexible cure model, using data on colon cancer patients in Finland. This new method gives similar results to a standard cure model, when it is reliable, and better fit when the standard cure model gives biased estimates.ConclusionsCure models within the framework of flexible parametric models enables cure modelling when standard models give biased estimates. These flexible cure models enable inclusion of older age groups and can give stage-specific estimates, which is not always possible from parametric cure models.

[1]  P. Lambert,et al.  Fitting and Modeling Cure in Population-Based Cancer Studies within the Framework of Flexible Parametric Survival Models , 2012 .

[2]  Paul C. Lambert,et al.  Estimating the cure fraction in population‐based cancer studies by using finite mixture models , 2010 .

[3]  Patrick Royston,et al.  Flexible Parametric Alternatives to the Cox Model, and more , 2001 .

[4]  M. Lehtonen,et al.  Data quality and quality control of a population-based cancer registry. Experience in Finland. , 1994, Acta oncologica.

[5]  Paul W Dickman,et al.  Estimating and modeling the cure fraction in population-based cancer survival analysis. , 2007, Biostatistics.

[6]  Patrick Royston Flexible alternatives to the Cox model, and more , 2001 .

[7]  Paul C. Lambert,et al.  Further Development of Flexible Parametric Models for Survival Analysis , 2009 .

[8]  K. Dear,et al.  A Nonparametric Mixture Model for Cure Rate Estimation , 2000, Biometrics.

[9]  J. P. Sy,et al.  Estimation in a Cox Proportional Hazards Cure Model , 2000, Biometrics.

[10]  E. Pukkala,et al.  DATA QUALITY AND QUALITY CONTROL OF A POPULATION-BASED CANCER REGISTRY , 1994 .

[11]  Colin B Begg,et al.  Attribution of deaths following cancer treatment. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  P. Dickman,et al.  Interpreting trends in cancer patient survival , 2006, Journal of internal medicine.

[13]  F. Berrino,et al.  The cure for colon cancer: Results from the EUROCARE study , 1998, International journal of cancer.

[14]  A Tsodikov,et al.  A proportional hazards model taking account of long-term survivors. , 1998, Biometrics.

[15]  P. Royston,et al.  Flexible parametric proportional‐hazards and proportional‐odds models for censored survival data, with application to prognostic modelling and estimation of treatment effects , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[16]  T. Hakulinen,et al.  Mixture models for cancer survival analysis: application to population-based data with covariates. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  Paul C. Lambert,et al.  Modeling of the Cure Fraction in Survival Studies , 2007 .

[18]  Paul C Lambert,et al.  Flexible parametric models for relative survival, with application in coronary heart disease , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[19]  P. Lambert,et al.  Temporal trends in the proportion cured for cancer of the colon and rectum: A population‐based study using data from the Finnish Cancer Registry , 2007, International journal of cancer.

[20]  Daniel Commenges,et al.  A penalized likelihood approach for mixture cure models , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[21]  Ram C Tiwari,et al.  Cure fraction estimation from the mixture cure models for grouped survival data , 2004, Statistics in medicine.