Optimal Investment Policies for a Firm With a Random Risk Process: Exponential Utility and Minimizing the Probability of Ruin

We consider a firm that is faced with an uncontrollable stochastic cash flow, or random risk process. There is one investment opportunity, a risky stock, and we study the optimal investment decision for such firms. There is a fundamental incompleteness in the market, in that the risk to the investor of going bankrupt cannot be eliminated under any investment strategy, since the random risk process ensures that there is always a positive probability of ruin bankruptcy. We therefore focus on obtaining investment strategies which are optimal in the sense of minimizing the risk of ruin. In particular, we solve for the strategy that maximizes the probability of achieving a given upper wealth level before hitting a given lower level. This policy also minimizes the probability of ruin. We prove that when there is no risk-free interest rate, this policy is equivalent to the policy that maximizes utility from terminal wealth, for a fixed terminal time, when the firm has an exponential utility function. This validates a longstanding conjecture about the relation between minimizing probability of ruin and exponential utility. When there is a positive risk-free interest rate, the conjecture is shown to be false. We also solve for the optimal policy for the related objective of minimizing the expected discounted penalty paid upon ruin.

[1]  N. L. Lawrie,et al.  Comparison Methods for Queues and Other Stochastic Models , 1984 .

[2]  Ward Whitt,et al.  Comparison methods for queues and other stochastic models , 1986 .

[3]  Steven A. Lippman,et al.  Constant Absolute Risk Aversion, Bankruptcy, and Wealth-Dependent Decisions , 1980 .

[4]  W. Fleming,et al.  Controlled Markov processes and viscosity solutions , 1992 .

[5]  I. Karatzas Optimization problems in the theory of continuous trading , 1989 .

[6]  J. Michael Harrison,et al.  Ruin problems with compounding assets , 1977 .

[7]  N. Krylov Controlled Diffusion Processes , 1980 .

[8]  T. Ferguson Betting Systems Which Minimize the Probability of Ruin , 1965 .

[9]  Stanley R. Pliska,et al.  A Stochastic Calculus Model of Continuous Trading: Optimal Portfolios , 1986, Math. Oper. Res..

[10]  John L. Kelly,et al.  A new interpretation of information rate , 1956, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[11]  William D. Sudderth,et al.  Continuous-Time Red and Black: How to Control a Diffusion to a Goal , 1985, Math. Oper. Res..

[12]  David Lindley,et al.  How to Gamble if You Must. (Inequalities for Stochastic Processes) By Lester E. Dubins and Leonard J. Savage. Pp. xiv, 249. 102s. 1965. (McGraw-Hill Book Co.) , 1966, The Mathematical Gazette.

[13]  Hans U. Gerber,et al.  An introduction to mathematical risk theory , 1982 .

[14]  J. Grandell Aspects of Risk Theory , 1991 .

[15]  L. Breiman Optimal Gambling Systems for Favorable Games , 1962 .

[16]  L. Donald Iglehart Diffusion approximations in collective risk theory , 1969 .

[17]  R. C. Merton,et al.  Optimum Consumption and Portfolio Rules in a Continuous-Time Model* , 1975 .

[18]  R. C. Merton,et al.  Continuous-Time Finance , 1990 .

[19]  Steven Orey,et al.  Reaching zero rapidly , 1987 .

[20]  J. Pratt RISK AVERSION IN THE SMALL AND IN THE LARGE11This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant NSF-G24035). Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government. , 1964 .

[21]  M. James Controlled markov processes and viscosity solutions , 1994 .

[22]  Robert M. Bell,et al.  Competitive Optimality of Logarithmic Investment , 1980, Math. Oper. Res..

[23]  Peter Whittle,et al.  Optimization Over Time , 1982 .

[24]  Marc Goovaerts,et al.  Effective actuarial methods , 1990 .