Material Damage-Based Model for Predicting Chip-Breakability

A model for predicting the chip breakability potential of groove and obstruction-type tools is described. The potential for a tool to break chips is evaluated in terms of the chip geometry and the damage sustained by the chip as it is formed in the shear zone. The chip geometry is characterized by its thickness-to-radius ratio, and the material damage is evaluated in terms of a normalized accumulated damage factor that is based on a hole growth and coalescence model. The chip thickness-to-radius ratio and the normalized accumulated damage factor are evaluated using a finite element cutting model. A total of 210 cutting tests were conducted to verify the model. Different tools including flat, obstruction, and groove, were tested for cutting of AISI 1020 steel and SS 304 steel. Each of these tool geometries exhibited significantly different chip thickness-to-radius ratios and normalized accumulated damage. Threshold criteria for breaking chips were determined for AISI 1020 and SS 304. For difficult-to-break materials such as stainless, a lower normalized accumulated damage was needed and a higher chip thickness-to-radius ratio was required to break chips. Although the model presented in the paper was developed for orthogonal cutting, it can be readily extended to three dimensional machining processes. Using this approach, a new tool design can be evaluated for its chip breakability potential with much less reliance on prototype building and testing.

[1]  Kazuo Nakayama,et al.  Comprehensive Chip Form Classification Based on the Cutting Mechanism , 1992 .

[2]  B. Worthington Surface integrity, cutting forces and chip formation when machining with double rake angle tools , 1974 .

[3]  A. H. Redford,et al.  Chip curl and the action of the groove type chip former , 1973 .

[4]  T. Shi,et al.  Slip-line solution for orthogonal cutting with a chip breaker and flank wear , 1991 .

[5]  P.L.B. Oxley,et al.  The Tool Restricted Contact Effect as a Major Influencing Factor in Chip Breaking: An Experimental Analysis , 1988 .

[6]  I. S. Jawahir,et al.  The chip control factor in machinability assessments: Recent trends , 1988 .

[7]  B. Worthington,et al.  Predicting breaking with groove type breakers , 1979 .

[8]  Plb Oxley,et al.  Efficient Chip Control at Reduced Power Consumption: An Experimental Analysis , 1988 .

[9]  F. Mcclintock,et al.  Ductile fracture by hole growth in shear bands , 1966 .

[10]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Recent developments in dea : the mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis , 1990 .

[11]  F. A. McClintock,et al.  A Criterion for Ductile Fracture by the Growth of Holes , 1968 .

[12]  I. S. Jawahir,et al.  A survey and future predictions for the use of chip breaking in unmanned systems , 1988 .

[13]  R. Sowerby,et al.  A proposal for the onset of chip segmentation in machining , 1989 .

[14]  K. Nakayama Chip control in metal cutting , 1984 .

[15]  T. Kondo,et al.  Cutting Tool with Curved Rake Face - A Means for Breaking Thin Chips , 1981 .

[16]  J. S. Strenkowski Study of chip-breaking mechanisms in orthogonal cutting. Technical report, April 1, 1990--June 30, 1991 , 1991 .

[17]  K. Nakayama A Study on Chip-breaker , 1961 .

[18]  C. A. van Luttervelt,et al.  Recent Developments in Chip Control Research and Applications , 1993 .

[19]  B. Worthington The effect of rake face configuration on the curvature of the chip in metal cutting , 1975 .