Clinical utility of brain age prediction in stroke patients: A longitudinal study

Cognitive deficits are important predictors for outcome, independence and quality of life after stroke, but often remain unnoticed and unattended because other impairments are more evident. Computerized cognitive training (CCT) is among the candidate interventions that may alleviate cognitive difficulties, but the evidence supporting its feasibility and effectiveness is scarce, partly due to the lack of tools for outcome prediction and monitoring. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides candidate markers for disease monitoring and outcome prediction. By integrating information not only about lesion extent and localization, but also regarding the integrity of the unaffected parts of the brain, advanced MRI provides relevant information for developing better prediction models in order to tailor cognitive intervention for patients, especially in a chronic phase.nnUsing brain age prediction based on MRI based brain morphometry and machine learning, we tested the hypotheses that stroke patients with a younger-appearing brain relative to their chronological age perform better on cognitive tests and benefit more from cognitive training compared to patients with an older-appearing brain. In this randomized double-blind study, 54 patients who suffered mild stroke (>6 months since hospital admission, NIHSS<7 at hospital discharge) underwent 3-weeks CCT and MRI before and after the intervention. In addition, patients were randomized to one of two groups receiving either active or sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). We tested for main effects of brain age gap (estimated age - chronological age) on cognitive performance, and associations between brain age gap and task improvement. Finally, we tested if longitudinal changes in brain age gap during the intervention were sensitive to treatment response. Briefly, our results suggest that longitudinal brain age prediction based on automated brain morphometry is feasible and reliable in stroke patients. However, no significant association between brain age and both performance and response to cognitive training were found.

[1]  F. Hummel,et al.  Brain networks and their relevance for stroke rehabilitation , 2019, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  Y. Stern,et al.  Brain-predicted age difference score is related to specific cognitive functions: a multi-site replication analysis , 2019, Brain Imaging and Behavior.

[3]  O. Andreassen,et al.  Brain age estimation is a sensitive marker of processing speed in the early course of multiple sclerosis , 2019, bioRxiv.

[4]  Lars T. Westlye,et al.  Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal MRI Brain Scans Reveal Accelerated Brain Aging in Multiple Sclerosis , 2019, Front. Neurol..

[5]  Erlend S. Dørum,et al.  Dissecting the cognitive phenotype of post-stroke fatigue using drift diffusion modeling of sustained attention , 2019, bioRxiv.

[6]  O. Godefroy,et al.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence in Post-Stroke Neurocognitive Disorders in Hospital-Based Studies , 2018, Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders.

[7]  Wesley K. Thompson,et al.  A Nonlinear Simulation Framework Supports Adjusting for Age When Analyzing BrainAGE , 2018, bioRxiv.

[8]  R. Marioni,et al.  Brain age and other bodily ‘ages’: implications for neuropsychiatry , 2018, Molecular Psychiatry.

[9]  Lars T. Westlye,et al.  Assessing distinct patterns of cognitive aging using tissue-specific brain age prediction based on diffusion tensor imaging and brain morphometry , 2018, bioRxiv.

[10]  Erlend S. Dørum,et al.  Genetics of brain age suggest an overlap with common brain disorders , 2018, bioRxiv.

[11]  J. Cole,et al.  Predicting Age Using Neuroimaging: Innovative Brain Ageing Biomarkers , 2017, Trends in Neurosciences.

[12]  G. Jackson,et al.  Structural MRI markers of brain aging early after ischemic stroke , 2017, Neurology.

[13]  E. Wehling,et al.  Cognitive Deficits in Chronic Stroke Patients: Neuropsychological Assessment, Depression, and Self-Reports , 2017, Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra.

[14]  V. Feigin,et al.  Global Burden of Stroke. , 2017, Circulation research.

[15]  Cam-CAN Group,et al.  The Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) data repository: Structural and functional MRI, MEG, and cognitive data from a cross-sectional adult lifespan sample , 2017, NeuroImage.

[16]  D. Delis,et al.  California Verbal Learning Test--Second Edition , 2016 .

[17]  P. M. Pedersen,et al.  Cognitive assessment at bedside for iPad: A preliminary validation of a novel cognitive test for stroke patients , 2016, European stroke journal.

[18]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex , 2016, Nature.

[19]  Rufus Akinyemi,et al.  Stroke injury, cognitive impairment and vascular dementia , 2016, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[20]  Tianqi Chen,et al.  XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System , 2016, KDD.

[21]  John Hobson.  The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). , 2015, Occupational medicine.

[22]  D. Chaudhari,et al.  Cognitive Impairment After Stroke , 2015, Cureus.

[23]  J. Bernhardt,et al.  The importance of cognition to quality of life after stroke. , 2014, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[24]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) study protocol: a cross-sectional, lifespan, multidisciplinary examination of healthy cognitive ageing , 2014, BMC Neurology.

[25]  G. Buccino,et al.  Assessing and restoring cognitive functions early after stroke. , 2014, Functional neurology.

[26]  Morten Wang Fagerland,et al.  Multifactorial Vascular Risk Factor Intervention to Prevent Cognitive Impairment after Stroke and TIA: A 12-month Randomized Controlled Trial , 2014, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[27]  John O. Willis,et al.  Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence , 2014 .

[28]  V. Feigin,et al.  Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 , 2014, The Lancet.

[29]  Cathy J. Price,et al.  Predicting outcome and recovery after stroke with lesions extracted from MRI images , 2013, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[30]  Eileen Luders,et al.  Brain maturation: Predicting individual BrainAGE in children and adolescents using structural MRI , 2012, NeuroImage.

[31]  C. Jacova,et al.  Cognitive impairment in lacunar strokes: The SPS3 trial , 2012, Annals of neurology.

[32]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Within-subject template estimation for unbiased longitudinal image analysis , 2012, NeuroImage.

[33]  Matthew E. Wolak,et al.  Guidelines for estimating repeatability , 2012 .

[34]  Stef van Buuren,et al.  MICE: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R , 2011 .

[35]  Claus Bundesen,et al.  Generalizing parametric models by introducing trial-by-trial parameter variability: The case of TVA , 2011 .

[36]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Recovery from post-stroke aphasia: lessons from brain imaging and implications for rehabilitation and biological treatments. , 2011, Discovery medicine.

[37]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Avoiding asymmetry-induced bias in longitudinal image processing , 2011, NeuroImage.

[38]  Sanford Weisberg,et al.  An R Companion to Applied Regression , 2010 .

[39]  V. Feigin,et al.  Auckland Stroke Outcomes Study , 2010, Neurology.

[40]  Andreas Engvig,et al.  Effects of memory training on cortical thickness in the elderly , 2010, NeuroImage.

[41]  Christian Gaser,et al.  Estimating the age of healthy subjects from T1-weighted MRI scans using kernel methods: Exploring the influence of various parameters , 2010, NeuroImage.

[42]  C. Bundesen,et al.  Principles of Visual Attention: Linking Mind and Brain , 2008 .

[43]  M. Nicholas,et al.  Language Rehabilitation in Chronic Aphasia and Time Postonset: A Review of Single-Subject Data , 2006, Stroke.

[44]  D. Piazzini,et al.  Long-term outcome after stroke: evaluating health-related quality of life using utility measurement. , 2006, Stroke.

[45]  Uwe Siebert,et al.  Long-Term Outcome After Stroke: Evaluating Health-Related Quality of Life Using Utility Measurements , 2006, Stroke.

[46]  J. Cummings,et al.  The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A Brief Screening Tool For Mild Cognitive Impairment , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[47]  C. Wolfe,et al.  Cognitive Impairment after Stroke: Clinical Determinants and Its Associations with Long‐Term Stroke Outcomes , 2002, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[48]  H. Haring.  Cognitive impairment after stroke , 2002, Current opinion in neurology.

[49]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[50]  C. Bundesen.  A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[51]  KI Quintyne.  Environmental Stewardship Resource Desk , 2021 .

[52]  Knut K. Kolskåra,et al.  Title : A randomized , double blind study of computerized cognitive training in combination with transcranial direct current stimulation ( tDCS ) in stroke patients – utility of fMRI as marker for training outcome , 2019 .

[53]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[54]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  The Global Burden of Disease Study , 2003 .

[55]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[56]  T. Hastie,et al.  Statistical Models in S , 1991 .

[57]  F. Purroy,et al.  And the Us: a Literature Review , 2022 .