Unilateral Nipple Reconstruction with Nipple Sharing: Time for a Second Look

Background: Nipple-sharing reconstruction in unilateral breast reconstruction is not a new technique. Although barriers to its regular use exist, no other technique can offer a nipple reconstruction with all of the following: proper size, proper shape, proper color match, proper texture, and long-term projection. The large number of flap techniques that exist for nipple reconstruction testify to the reconstructive challenge. Methods: This study describes 57 patients who underwent nipple sharing as their primary mode of nipple reconstruction. Results: Overall patient satisfaction with the technique was 88 percent. Data regarding size, shape, color, sensation, and erectile function in the graft, and donor-site morbidity are presented. Conclusions: These data provide the physician with the necessary information to make an informed discussion regarding nipple-sharing reconstruction. Nipple sharing should be considered a viable alternative in unilateral breast reconstruction and should especially be considered after irradiation where flap procedures are contraindicated.

[1]  Charles E Garramone,et al.  Use of AlloDerm in Primary Nipple Reconstruction to Improve Long-Term Nipple Projection , 2007, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  Y. Rasko,et al.  The Use of Calcium Hydroxylapatite for Nipple Projection After Failed Nipple-Areolar Reconstruction: Early Results , 2005, Annals of plastic surgery.

[3]  P. Panettiere,et al.  Filler Injection Enhances the Projection of the Reconstructed Nipple:An Original Easy Technique , 2005, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[4]  A. Gabriel,et al.  Assessment of Long‐Term Nipple Projection: A Comparison of Three Techniques , 2002, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  Tomer Z. Karas,et al.  Nipple‐Areola Reconstruction: Satisfaction and Clinical Determinants , 2002, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[6]  P. Hansson,et al.  Threshold of Tactile Perception After Nipple-Sharing: a Prospective Study , 2002, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[7]  A. Losken,et al.  Nipple Reconstruction Using the C‐V Flap Technique: A Long‐Term Evaluation , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[8]  L. Casas,et al.  Long-term predictable nipple projection following reconstruction. , 1999, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  C. Vacanti,et al.  Tissue‐Engineered Nipple Reconstruction , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  K. Kiyokawa,et al.  Nipple-areola reconstruction with a dermal-fat flap and rolled auricular cartilage. , 1997, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[11]  J. S. Eng Bell Flap Nipple Reconstruction—A New Wrinkle , 1996, Annals of plastic surgery.

[12]  C. Hartrampf,et al.  Nipple Reconstruction With Local Flaps: Star and Wrap Flaps , 1991 .

[13]  F. Stieg,et al.  Nipple/areolar reconstruction. , 1991, Plastic surgical nursing : official journal of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Nurses.

[14]  G. Hallock Polyurethane nipple prosthesis. , 1990, Annals of plastic surgery.

[15]  S. S. Kroll,et al.  Nipple reconstruction with the double-opposing-tab flap. , 1989, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[16]  J. Weiss,et al.  The S nipple-areola reconstruction. , 1989, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[17]  J. W. Little,et al.  The Finishing Touches in Nipple-Areolar Reconstruction , 1988 .

[18]  W. Chang Nipple reconstruction with a T flap. , 1984, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[19]  R. Gruber Nipple-areola reconstruction: a review of techniques. , 1979, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[20]  J. Bostwick,et al.  NIPPLE-AREOLA RECONSTRUCTION WITH AURICULAR TISSUES , 1977, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.