Towards a Framework of Digital Platform Disruption: A Comparative Study of Centralized & Decentralized Digital Payment Providers

Digital platforms are disruptive information technology (IT) artifacts that erode conventional business logic associated with traditional market structures. This paper presents a framework for examining the disruptive potential of digital platforms whereby we postulate that the strategic interplay of governance regimes and platform layers is deterministic of whether disruptive derivatives are permitted to flourish. This framework has been employed in a comparative case study between centralized (i.e., PayPal) and decentralized (i.e., Coinkite) digital payment platforms to illustrate its applicability and yield propositions on the nature and impact of digital platform disruptions. Preliminary findings indicate that centralized digital platforms attempt to create unique configurals to obtain monopolistic power by tightly coupling platform layers, which are difficult to replicate. Conversely, decentralized digital platforms purposely decouple platform layers, to foster open innovation and accelerate market disruption. This paper therefore represents a first concrete step aimed at unravelling the disruptive potential of digital platforms.

[1]  Line Dubé,et al.  Rigor in Information Systems Positivist Case Research: Current Practices , 2003, MIS Q..

[2]  W. James Potter,et al.  Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis , 1999 .

[3]  K. Boudreau,et al.  How to Manage Outside Innovation , 2009 .

[4]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Strategies for Two Sided Markets , 2006 .

[5]  Julian Wright,et al.  Multi-Sided Platforms , 2015 .

[6]  Rahul Telang,et al.  Inferring app demand from publicly available data , 2013 .

[7]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics , 2010 .

[8]  Kevin J. Boudreau,et al.  Open Platform Strategies and Innovation: Granting Access vs. Devolving Control , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[9]  Ola Henfridsson,et al.  Balancing platform control and external contribution in third‐party development: the boundary resources model , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[10]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Platform Envelopment , 2010 .

[11]  A. Gawer,et al.  Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation , 2013 .

[12]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS , 1996 .

[13]  Wilbur Schramm,et al.  Notes on Case Studies of Instructional Media Projects. , 1971 .

[14]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[15]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  Moshe Zviran,et al.  Factors Affecting the Policy for Distributing Computing Resources , 1989, MIS Q..

[17]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Change and Control Paradoxes in Mobile Infrastructure Innovation: The Android and iOS Mobile Operating Systems Cases , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[18]  J. Rochet,et al.  Platform competition in two sided markets , 2003 .

[19]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The Disruptive Nature of Information Technology Innovations: The Case of Internet Computing in Systems Development Organizations , 2003, MIS Q..

[20]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[21]  Roberto Roson,et al.  Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets: The Case of Payment Networks , 2004 .

[22]  Varun Grover,et al.  An Empirically Derived Taxonomy of Information Technology Structure and Its Relationship to Organizational Structure , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Robert A. Burgelman,et al.  Cross-Boundary Disruptors: Powerful Inter-Industry Entrepreneurial Change Agents , 2007 .

[24]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Technology strategy and managementThe evolution of platform thinking , 2010, CACM.

[25]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..

[26]  Jeffrey H. Moore,et al.  A Framework for MIS Software Development Projects , 1979, MIS Q..

[27]  Joel West,et al.  How open is open enough?: Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies , 2003 .

[28]  Patricia A. Adler,et al.  Intense Loyalty in Organizations: A Case Study of College Athletics. , 1988 .

[29]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[30]  Richard Leifer,et al.  Matching Computer-Based Information Systems with Organizational Structures , 1988, MIS Q..

[31]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  Alignment of the IS Functions With the Enterprise: Toward a Model of Antecedents , 1994, MIS Q..

[32]  Rahul Telang,et al.  Inferring App Demand from Publicly Available Data , 2013, MIS Q..

[33]  Carol V. Brown.  Examining the Emergence of Hybrid IS Governance Solutions: Evidence From a Single Case Site , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[35]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm , 2011 .

[36]  Larry Downes,et al.  Big Bang Disruption , 2013 .