Choice of Regulator for Mutual Network Synchronization
暂无分享,去创建一个
This paper compares time-discrete regulators used for mutual single-ended synchronization of digital networks. The regulators control the phase differences between clocks in the network nodes. These clocks are disturbed mainly by short-term phase and frequency fluctuations and long-term linear frequency drift. The characteristics of the regulators under study are stability, engineering, and implentation. The main results of the stability analysis are that the P regulator brings about a constant slip rate, the Pl regulator is not slip-free, the Pll 2 regulator is slip-free. With nonzero initial phase differences and jitter, the stability of the regulators containing integrators is secured by not regulating one of the nodes. In conclusion, the Pll 2 regulator is the best choice for single-ended mutual network synchronization.
[1] K. R. Krishnan,et al. Discrete-Control Correction: A Technique for the Synchronization of Digital Communication Networks. , 1976 .
[2] J. P. Moreland. Performance of a system of mutually synchronized clocks , 1971 .
[3] A. Davies. Discrete-time synchronization of digital data networks , 1975 .
[4] Herbert Freeman,et al. Discrete-Time Systems , 1980 .
[5] A. Marlevi. Direct Digitally Controlled Network Synchronization , 1979, IEEE Trans. Commun..