Physical Layer Latency Management Mechanisms: A Study for Millimeter-Wave Wi-Fi

Emerging applications in fields such as extended reality require both a high throughput and low latency. The millimeter-wave (mmWave) spectrum is considered because of the potential in the large available bandwidth. The present work studies mmWave Wi-Fi physical layer latency management mechanisms, a key factor in providing low-latency communications for time-critical applications. We calculate physical layer latency in an ideal scenario and simulate it using a tailor-made simulation framework, based on the IEEE 802.11ad standard. Assessing data reception quality over a noisy channel yielded latency’s dependency on transmission parameters, channel noise, and digital baseband tuning. Latency in function of the modulation and coding scheme was found to span 0.28–2.71 ms in the ideal scenario, whereas simulation results also revealed its tight bond with the demapping algorithm and the number of low-density parity-check decoder iterations. The findings yielded tuning parameter combinations for reaching Pareto optimality either by constraining the bit error rate and optimizing latency or the other way around. Our assessment shows that trade-offs can and have to be made to provide sufficiently reliable low-latency communication. In good channel conditions, one may benefit from both the very high throughput and low latency; yet, in more adverse situations, lower modulation orders and additional coding overhead are a necessity.

[1]  Gregor Geršak,et al.  Effect of VR technology matureness on VR sickness , 2018, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[2]  Alexandros Kaloxylos,et al.  V2X Communication over Cellular Networks: Capabilities and Challenges , 2021, Telecom.

[3]  Brad Wyble,et al.  Detecting meaning in RSVP at 13 ms per picture , 2013, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[4]  Vishal Sharma,et al.  Performance Analysis of IEEE 802.11e (EDCF) and IEEE 802.11(DCF) WLAN Incorporating Different Physical Layer Standards , 2012 .

[5]  Kyu-Han Kim,et al.  WiFi-Assisted 60 GHz Wireless Networks , 2017, MobiCom.

[6]  Cong Lu,et al.  A Novel QoS-aware ARQ Scheme for Multi-User Transmissions in IEEE802.11ax WLANs , 2020 .

[7]  Boris Bellalta,et al.  Time-Sensitive Networking in IEEE 802.11be: On the Way to Low-Latency WiFi 7 , 2019, Sensors.

[8]  Garima Shukla,et al.  Evaluation of Latency in IEEE 802.11ad , 2020 .

[9]  Cong Lu,et al.  A Novel QoS-Aware A-MPDU Aggregation Scheduler for Unsaturated IEEE802.11n/ac WLANs , 2020 .

[10]  Heejung Yu,et al.  5G Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication Implementation Challenges and Operational Issues with IoT Devices , 2019, Electronics.

[11]  Dinesh Bharadia,et al.  Facilitating Low Latency and Reliable VR over Heterogeneous Wireless Networks , 2018, MobiCom.

[12]  Aaron Stillmaker,et al.  Scaling equations for the accurate prediction of CMOS device performance from 180 nm to 7 nm , 2017, Integr..

[13]  Gianluigi Ferrari,et al.  LDPC Coded Modulations , 2009 .

[14]  Liesbet Van der Perre,et al.  Keeping up with the bits: tracking physical layer latency in millimeter-wave Wi-Fi networks , 2021, ArXiv.

[15]  Marco Gruteser,et al.  Cutting the Cord: Designing a High-quality Untethered VR System with Low Latency Remote Rendering , 2018, MobiSys.

[16]  Norbert Wehn,et al.  A high throughput architecture for a low complexity soft-output demapping algorithm , 2015 .

[17]  Shekhar Y. Borkar,et al.  Design challenges of technology scaling , 1999, IEEE Micro.

[18]  Sanghyun Kim,et al.  Motion-Aware Interplay between WiGig and WiFi for Wireless Virtual Reality , 2020, Sensors.

[19]  Xinyu Zhang,et al.  Pose Information Assisted 60 GHz Networks: Towards Seamless Coverage and Mobility Support , 2017, MobiCom.

[20]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  Latency requirements for head-worn display S/EVS applications , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[21]  S. Budisin Efficient pulse compressor for Golay complementary sequences , 1991 .