Image Quality Assessment of Head CT: Control Charts as an Useful Instrument

Themain objective of this research was to determine if the diagnostic image, acquired by CT scan, meets the quality criteria previously established for head CT exams. A total of 360 Head Co mputed Tomography exams were analy zed, using a checklist. For data collect ion, quality criteria were created, organized into four criteria groups, consisting of multip le items that must appear in the images studies. After data processing, a large number o f non-conformexaminations were identified in than more than 50% of the sample. We concluded the main causes of these results are: the "incorrect or incomp lete positioning", the "lack of name of the radiographer and "mot ion artefacts". Therefore it is essential to implement a checklist for a systematic evaluationof procedures.

[1]  Rajesh K. Kana,et al.  Brain mechanisms of perceiving tools and imagining tool use acts: A functional MRI study , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  Hubert Cecotti,et al.  A time-frequency convolutional neural network for the offline classification of steady-state visual evoked potential responses , 2011, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[3]  S. Pomerantz,et al.  Quality assurance for abdominal CT: a rapid, computer-assisted technique. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  Seyed Navid Resalat,et al.  High-speed SSVEP-based BCI: Study of various frequency pairs and inter-sources distances , 2012, Proceedings of 2012 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[5]  Reinhold Scherer,et al.  Steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)-based communication: impact of harmonic frequency components , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[6]  S. Andersen,et al.  Effects of overt and covert attention on the steady-state visual evoked potential , 2012, Neuroscience Letters.

[7]  Zhenghua Wu The difference of SSVEP resulted by different pulse duty-cycle , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Communications, Circuits and Systems.

[8]  Seyed Kamaledin Setarehdan,et al.  A Study on the Effect of the Inter-Sources Distance on the Performance of the SSVEP-Based BCI Systems , 2012 .

[9]  Po-Lei Lee,et al.  An SSVEP-Based BCI Using High Duty-Cycle Visual Flicker , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Hubert Cecotti,et al.  Spelling with non-invasive Brain–Computer Interfaces – Current and future trends , 2011, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[11]  W. A. Sarnacki,et al.  Brain–computer interface (BCI) operation: optimizing information transfer rates , 2003, Biological Psychology.

[12]  F. Afdideh,et al.  Real-time monitoring of military sentinel sleepiness using a novel SSVEP-based BCI system , 2012, 2012 IEEE-EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences.

[13]  Dezhong Yao,et al.  Stimulator selection in SSVEP-based BCI. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[14]  D. C. oksey C. Eshelman,et al.  The quality toolbox , 1992 .

[15]  Po-Lei Lee,et al.  Dual-frequency steady-state visual evoked potential for brain computer interface , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[16]  Dennis J. McFarland,et al.  Brain-computer interface (BCI) operation: signal and noise during early training sessions , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  J. Murdoch Shewhart Control Charts , 1979 .

[18]  Seyed Kamaledin Setarehdan,et al.  Appropriate twinkling frequency and inter-sources distance selection in SSVEP-based HCI systems , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Signal and Image Processing Applications (ICSIPA).

[19]  Teodiano Freire Bastos Filho,et al.  SSVEP-BCI implementation for 37–40 Hz frequency range , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[20]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  An online multi-channel SSVEP-based brain–computer interface using a canonical correlation analysis method , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[21]  Xingyu Wang,et al.  Author's Personal Copy Biomedical Signal Processing and Control Lasso Based Stimulus Frequency Recognition Model for Ssvep Bcis , 2022 .