Supporting transitions in work: informing large display application design by understanding whiteboard use

In this paper, we explore the practice of using a whiteboard for multiple tasks, and specifically how users employ whiteboards to smoothly transition between related sets of tasks. Our study underscores several basic, but important affordances of whiteboards that support this practice, including visual persistence, flexibility of interaction primitives, and their situated physicality. We discuss the implications of these findings for the design of large display applications.

[1]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  Meetings of the Board: The Impact of Scheduling Medium on Long Term Group Coordination in Software Development , 1999, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[2]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Public and Situated Displays: Social and Interactional Aspects of Shared Display Technologies , 2004 .

[3]  J. Gosby MEDIA REVIEWS: Basics of Qualitative Research - Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory 2nd Edition by A. Strauss and J. Corbin. Sage Publications, , 2000 .

[4]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  The introduction of a shared interactive surface into a communal space , 2004, CSCW.

[5]  Adam M. Fass,et al.  MessyDesk and MessyBoard: two designs inspired by the goal of improving human memory , 2002, DIS '02.

[6]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt,et al.  Semi-public displays for small, co-located groups , 2003, CHI '03.

[7]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  A Descriptive Framework of Workspace Awareness for Real-Time Groupware , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[8]  Robert DeLine,et al.  Let's go to the whiteboard: how and why software developers use drawings , 2007, CHI.

[9]  Colin F. Mackenzie,et al.  Cognitive properties of a whiteboard: A case study in a trauma centre , 2001, ECSCW.

[10]  Norbert A. Streitz,et al.  i-LAND: an interactive landscape for creativity and innovation , 1999, CHI '99.

[11]  Thomas P. Moran,et al.  Tivoli: an electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings , 1993, INTERCHI.

[12]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt,et al.  Secrets to success and fatal flaws: the design of large-display groupware , 2006, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[13]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Email overload: exploring personal information management of email , 1996, CHI.

[14]  Li-Te Cheng,et al.  Supporting activity-centric collaboration through peer-to-peer shared objects , 2003, GROUP '03.

[15]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt The Writing on the Wall , 1999, INTERACT.

[16]  Harold Thimbleby,et al.  A reflexive perspective of CSCW , 1991, SGCH.

[17]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  Beyond the chalkboard: computer support for collaboration and problem solving in meetings , 1988, CACM.

[18]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  TeamWorkStation: towards a seamless shared workspace , 1990, CSCW '90.

[19]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  The notification collage: posting information to public and personal displays , 2001, CHI.

[20]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  Using a Room Metaphor to Ease Transitions in Groupware , 1998 .

[21]  N. Hoffart Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[22]  Takeo Igarashi,et al.  Flatland: new dimensions in office whiteboards , 1999, CHI '99.

[23]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Integration of Inter-Personal Space and Shared Workspace: ClearBoard Design and Experiments , 1992, CSCW.

[24]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt,et al.  Displays in the Wild: Understanding the Dynamics and Evolution of a Display Ecology , 2006, Pervasive.

[25]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  How does radical collocation help a team succeed? , 2000, CSCW '00.

[26]  Harold W. Thimbleby,et al.  Reflexive CSCW: Supporting Long-Term Personal Work , 1990, Interact. Comput..

[27]  Blair MacIntyre,et al.  Integrating virtual and physical context to support knowledge workers , 2002, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[28]  Daniel M. Russell,et al.  Social Aspects of Using Large Public Interactive Displays for Collaboration , 2002, UbiComp.

[29]  E. Hutchins Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[30]  Scott L. Minneman,et al.  Evolutionary engagement in an ongoing collaborative work process: a case study , 1996, CSCW '96.

[31]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Display-Based Activity in the Workplace , 2003, INTERACT.