Alternative paradigms and the study and practice of performance management and evaluation

Abstract Performance management and evaluation (PME) is a well-established element of any organizational system of human resource management. However, the research field for PME is dominated by a one-dimensional approach located within positivist ontology. This paper explores and compares this positivist approach to PME with approaches located in other paradigms, more specifically interpretivism and critical theory. The paper argues that paradigmatic diversity in the study of PME would contribute a multidimensional, more sophisticated and nuanced approach. While research on PME within interpretivist and critical paradigms has been conducted over many years it is largely ignored or rejected in North America where a focus on managerialist prescriptions drives the research agenda. This paper calls for innovation through paradigmatic diversity in PME research and scholarship rather than further, incremental development of prescriptive models.

[1]  Michelle Brown,et al.  Rated to Exhaustion? Reactions to Performance Appraisal Processes , 2003 .

[2]  K. Legge.  Human Resource Management: Rhetorics and Realities , 1995 .

[3]  Celia Moore,et al.  New Developments in Performance Management , 2005 .

[4]  S. Clegg.  Modern Organizations: Organization Studies in the Postmodern World , 1990 .

[5]  Barbara Townley,et al.  FOUCAULT, POWER/KNOWLEDGE, AND ITS RELEVANCE FOR HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT , 1993 .

[6]  Paul Sparrow,et al.  Redefining the field of European human resource management: A battle between national mindsets and forces of business transition? , 1997 .

[7]  Robert Folger,et al.  Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management , 1998 .

[8]  David C. Martin,et al.  Performance Appraisal: Maintaining System Effectiveness , 1998 .

[9]  Chris Brewster,et al.  Strategic Human Resource Management: The Value of Different Paradigms , 1999 .

[10]  M. Best,et al.  The new competition , 1990 .

[11]  T. Watson.  HRM and Critical Social Science Analysis , 2004 .

[12]  Pierre Mourier.  Goal translation how to create a results‐focused organizational culture , 2000 .

[13]  Michael E. Pacanowsky,et al.  Organizational communication as cultural performance , 1983 .

[14]  Sally Maitlis,et al.  An exploratory study of goal setting in theory and practice: A motivational technique that works? , 1995 .

[15]  Graham Barlow.  DEFICIENCIES AND THE PERPETUATION OF POWER: LATENT FUNCTIONS IN MANAGEMENT APPRAISAL , 1989 .

[16]  A. Freund,et al.  Goal progress makes one happy, or does it? Longitudinal findings from the work domain , 2005 .

[17]  R. Brennan,et al.  Transferring Western HRM practices to developing countries: The case of a privatized utility in Jordan , 2009 .

[18]  G. Latham,et al.  Goal Setting and Goal Orientation: An Integration of Two Different Yet Related Literatures , 2004 .

[19]  Carl F. Fey,et al.  Institutional theory and MNC subsidiary HRM practices: evidence from a three-country study , 2007 .

[20]  Neil M. Boyd.  Expanding the View of Performance Appraisal by Introducing Social Justice Concerns , 2004 .

[21]  P. Levy,et al.  The Social Context of Performance Appraisal: A Review and Framework for the Future , 2004 .

[22]  Jos Gamble,et al.  Transferring human resource practices from the United Kingdom to China: the limits and potential for convergence , 2003 .

[23]  Herman Aguinis.  Performance Management , 2005 .

[24]  K. R. Milner,et al.  A multiple-goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[25]  Russell D. Lansbury,et al.  International and Comparative Employment Relations , 2000 .

[26]  Scott A. Snell,et al.  Managing human resources , 1988 .

[27]  Jay J. Jamrog,et al.  Building a Strategic HR Function: Continuing the Evolution , 2004 .

[28]  H. Willmott,et al.  Power and Subjectivity at Work: From Degradation to Subjugation in Social Relations , 1989 .

[29]  K. M. Bartol,et al.  The Legal Ramifications of Performance Appraisal: The Growing Significance , 2000 .

[30]  J. J. Donovan,et al.  Missing the mark: effects of time and causal attributions on goal revision in response to goal-performance discrepancies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[31]  E. Barratt,et al.  Foucault, Foucauldianism and human resource management , 2002 .

[32]  Clinton O. Longenecker,et al.  Ethical dilemmas in performance appraisal revisited , 1990 .

[33]  Jos Gamble,et al.  Introducing Western-style HRM practices to China: Shopfloor perceptions in a British multinational § , 2006 .

[34]  I. Chow.  The impact of institutional context on human resource management in three Chinese societies , 2004 .

[35]  Thomas J. Peters,et al.  A passion for excellence , 1985 .

[36]  J. Lepine.  Adaptation of teams in response to unforeseen change: effects of goal difficulty and team composition in terms of cognitive ability and goal orientation. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[37]  Parbudyal Singh,et al.  Negotiating, accepting and resisting HRM: a Chinese case study , 2010 .

[38]  M. Archer.  Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation , 2003 .

[39]  Jay B. Carson,et al.  Practical Applications of Goal Setting Theory to Performance Management , 2008 .

[40]  G. Gelade,et al.  Test of a service profit chain model in the retail banking sector , 2005 .

[41]  W. Edwards Deming,et al.  Out of the Crisis , 1982 .

[42]  J. Paauwe.  HRM and performance , 2004 .

[43]  D. R. Ilgen,et al.  Performance Appraisal Process Research in the 1980s: What Has It Contributed to Appraisals in Use? , 1993 .

[44]  D. Morgan,et al.  Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. , 1983 .

[45]  Clinton O. Longenecker,et al.  Quality Improvement through Team Goal Setting, Feedback, and Problem Solving , 1994 .

[46]  Mahmoud Ezzamel,et al.  The Strength of Difference: Contemporary Conceptions of Control , 2005 .

[47]  M. Erez,et al.  Challenge versus threat effects on the goal–performance relationship , 2002 .

[48]  Maurice E. Schweitzer,et al.  Goal Setting as a Motivator of Unethical Behavior , 2004 .

[49]  James W. Smither,et al.  Performance management : putting research into action , 2009 .

[50]  S. McKenna.  Can Knowledge of the Characteristics of "High Performers" Be Generalised?. , 2002 .

[51]  R. Merton.  Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .

[52]  Catherine Truss,et al.  Complexities and Controversies in Linking HRM with Organizational Outcomes , 2001 .

[53]  Kevin R. Murphy,et al.  Performance appraisal: An organizational perspective. , 1991 .

[54]  Gerald L. Wilson,et al.  The performance appraisal interview: An interpretive reassessment , 1986 .

[55]  Barbara Townley,et al.  Reframing Human Resource Management: Power, Ethics and the Subject at Work , 1994 .

[56]  James A. Holstein,et al.  The new language of qualitative method , 1997 .

[57]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Behind the Mask: The Politics of Employee Appraisal , 1987 .

[58]  Peter McLean,et al.  At the coalface : identity implications of performance appraisal at an underground coal mine , 2008 .

[59]  Gregory A. Bigley,et al.  Motivation and Leadership At Work , 1996 .

[60]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE FIELD OF HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT: ISSUES AND CHALLENGES FOR THE FUTURE , 2004 .

[61]  R. A. Cooke,et al.  Ethical dilemmas in performance appraisal , 1984 .

[62]  Elaine Farndale,et al.  Uncovering competitive and institutional drivers of HRM practices in multinational corporations , 2007 .

[63]  Laura L. Koppes,et al.  Historical Perspectives in Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2020 .