Property Crime Victimisation: The Roles of Individual and Area Influences

The likelihood of being a victim of property crime is modelled using the characteristics of the individual household and of the area. In addition to total property crime, we separately consider the components of burglary, theft and criminal damage. In all cases, both area and individual variables are significant predictors of victimisation risk, but the area is generally more important than the individual. We also find that an unexplained correlation remains between households within the same area. To caricature our overall results, young professionals living in detached or semi-detached houses in poor areas are particularly likely to fall victim to crime.

[1]  Terance D. Miethe CITIZEN-BASED CRIME CONTROL ACTIVITY AND VICTIMIZATION RISKS: AN EXAMINATION OF DISPLACEMENT AND FREE-RIDER EFFECTS* , 1991 .

[2]  P. Mayhew,et al.  Taking account of crime : key findings from the second British crime survey , 1985 .

[3]  H. Goldstein Multilevel mixed linear model analysis using iterative generalized least squares , 1986 .

[4]  D. Farrington,et al.  Integrating individual and ecological aspects of crime , 1993 .

[5]  R. Sampson,et al.  Community Structure and Crime: Testing Social-Disorganization Theory , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  M. Maxfield Household composition, routine activity, and victimization: A comparative analysis , 1987 .

[7]  Alan Trickett,et al.  Area characteristics and regional variates as determinants of area property crime levels , 1992 .

[8]  The Criminal's Image of the City , 1979 .

[9]  C. Hale,et al.  The Structural Determinants of Fear of Crime: An Analysis Using Census and Crime Survey Data from England and Wales* , 1994 .

[10]  Robert J. Sampson,et al.  Linking the micro- and macro-level dimensions of lifestyle-routine activity and opportunity models of predatory victimization , 1987 .

[11]  K. Pease,et al.  WHAT IS DIFFERENT ABOUT HIGH CRIME AREAS , 1992 .

[12]  H. D. McKay,et al.  Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas , 1943 .

[13]  Leslie W. Kennedy,et al.  ROUTINE ACTIVITIES AND CRIME: AN ANALYSIS OF VICTIMIZATION IN CANADA * , 1990 .

[14]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1992 .

[15]  H. Goldstein Nonlinear multilevel models, with an application to discrete response data , 1991 .

[16]  J. S. Long,et al.  Social Differentiation in Criminal Victimization: A Test of Routine Activities/Lifestyle Theories , 1987 .

[17]  S. Osborn MOVING HOME, LEAVING LONDON AND DELINQUENT TRENDS , 1980 .