Outcome assessment for epilepsy surgery: The impact of measuring health‐related quality of life

Epilepsy surgery is an increasingly common treatment for intractable epilepsy; yet there is no clear consensus among experts on how to report epilepsy surgery outcome. Most published outcome reporting systems focus on seizure frequency and type but differ in how they define clinically distinct outcome categories. We used a reliable and valid measure of self‐reported health‐related quality of life (HRQOL), the Epilepsy Surgery Inventory (ESI)‐55, as an external standard by which to evaluate seven previously published, seizure‐based outcome classification systems. The ESI‐55 was administered to 133 adults who had previously undergone surgery for intractable epilepsy, and results were linked to data on their seizure occurrence before and after surgery (over the year prior to their HRQOL reports). These 133 patients were classified according to each seizure‐based outcome system, and variation in HRQOL across outcome groups was evaluated using analysis of variance. Results reveal noteworthy variation in the extent to which different systems reflect patients' HRQOL at follow‐up. We modified existing systems to derive a seizure‐based surgery outcome system that most closely reflects HRQOL when applied over the latest 1‐year postoperative interval.

[1]  M H Liang,et al.  Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research. , 1985, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[2]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[3]  R. Bhatia,et al.  A Follow‐Up Study of 91 Patients Operated on for Focal Epilepsy , 1976, Epilepsia.

[4]  G. Ojemann,et al.  The Surgical management of epilepsy , 1994 .

[5]  D. Spencer,et al.  The localizing value of depth electroencephalography in 32 patients with refractory epilepsy , 1982, Annals of neurology.

[6]  Ellwood Pm,et al.  Shattuck Lecture--outcomes management. A technology of patient experience. 1988. , 1997, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[7]  Jerome Engel,et al.  Outcome with respect to epileptic seizures. , 1993 .

[8]  David F. Smith,et al.  Seizure frequency, patient-perceived seizure severity and the psychosocial consequences of intractable epilepsy , 1991, Epilepsy Research.

[9]  I. Jensen,et al.  TEMPORAL LOBE EPILEPSY , 1976, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[10]  T. Rasmussen Surgical Treatment of Complex Partial Seizures: Results, Lessons, and Problems , 1983, Epilepsia.

[11]  J. Engel,et al.  A Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument for Patients Evaluated for Epilepsy Surgery , 1992, Medical care.

[12]  S Greenfield,et al.  The state of outcome research: are we on target? , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  A. Friedman,et al.  Anterior temporal lobectomy for complex partial seizures , 1990, Neurology.

[14]  A R Feinstein,et al.  A Clinical‐Severity Staging System for Patients with Lung Cancer , 1990, Medicine.

[15]  S. Shorvon,et al.  A quantitative approach to measuring the social effects of epilepsy. , 1990, Neuroepidemiology.

[16]  S. Goldring,et al.  Surgical management of epilepsy using epidural recordings to localize the seizure focus. Review of 100 cases. , 1984, Journal of neurosurgery.

[17]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. , 1993, Health economics.

[18]  D. King,et al.  Temporal lobectomy for partial complex seizures , 1986, Neurology.

[19]  S. Schoenbaum Toward fewer procedures and better outcomes. , 1993, JAMA.

[20]  G. Ojemann,et al.  Multidisciplinary prediction of seizure relief from cortical resection surgery , 1986, Annals of neurology.

[21]  A. Wyler,et al.  Short-term psychological outcome of anterior temporal lobectomy. , 1989, Journal of neurosurgery.

[22]  J. Collings,et al.  Epilepsy and well-being. , 1990, Social science & medicine.