Measuring Drivers' Physiological Response to Different Vehicle Controllers in Highly Automated Driving (HAD): Opportunities for Establishing Real-Time Values of Driver Discomfort

This study investigated how driver discomfort was influenced by different types of automated vehicle (AV) controllers, compared to manual driving, and whether this response changed in different road environments, using heart-rate variability (HRV) and electrodermal activity (EDA). A total of 24 drivers were subjected to manual driving and four AV controllers: two modelled to depict “human-like” driving behaviour, one conventional lane-keeping assist controller, and a replay of their own manual drive. Each drive lasted for ~15 min and consisted of rural and urban environments, which differed in terms of average speed, road geometry and road-based furniture. Drivers showed higher skin conductance response (SCR) and lower HRV during manual driving, compared to the automated drives. There were no significant differences in discomfort between the AV controllers. SCRs and subjective discomfort ratings showed significantly higher discomfort in the faster rural environments, when compared to the urban environments. Our results suggest that SCR values are more sensitive than HRV-based measures to continuously evolving situations that induce discomfort. Further research may be warranted in investigating the value of this metric in assessing real-time driver discomfort levels, which may help improve acceptance of AV controllers.

[1]  Andy Adler,et al.  Validation of the Empatica E4 wristband , 2016, 2016 IEEE EMBS International Student Conference (ISC).

[2]  Kyongsu Yi,et al.  Human driving data-based design of a vehicle adaptive cruise control algorithm , 2008 .

[3]  Mauro Da Lio,et al.  On the human control of vehicles: an experimental study of acceleration , 2013, European Transport Research Review.

[4]  Erwin R. Boer.  Satisficing Curve Negotiation: Explaining Drivers’ Situated Lateral Position Variability , 2016 .

[5]  J. Thayer,et al.  Heart Rate Variability and Cardiac Vagal Tone in Psychophysiological Research – Recommendations for Experiment Planning, Data Analysis, and Data Reporting , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[6]  Nadia W. Mullen,et al.  Physiological responses to simulated and on-road driving. , 2011, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[7]  Jeongseok Seo,et al.  Toward a Comfortable Driving Experience for a Self-Driving Shuttle Bus , 2019, Electronics.

[8]  J. P. Powell,et al.  Passenger Stability Within Moving Railway Vehicles: Limits on Maximum Longitudinal Acceleration , 2015 .

[9]  K. Slater.  DISCUSSION PAPER THE ASSESSMENT OF COMFORT , 1986 .

[10]  Hiran Ekanayake,et al.  Comparing Expert Driving Behavior in Real World and Simulator Contexts , 2013, Int. J. Comput. Games Technol..

[11]  R. Alarcón,et al.  Non‐normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option? , 2017, Psicothema.

[12]  Jennifer Healey,et al.  Detecting stress during real-world driving tasks using physiological sensors , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[13]  Mika P. Tarvainen,et al.  Kubios HRV - Heart rate variability analysis software , 2014, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[14]  Josef F. Krems,et al.  Physiological correlates of discomfort in automated driving , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[15]  M. Griffin,et al.  Discomfort caused by low-frequency lateral oscillation, roll oscillation and roll-compensated lateral oscillation , 2013, Ergonomics.

[16]  Janko Drnovsek,et al.  Non-contact heart rate and heart rate variability measurements: A review , 2014, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[17]  Robin A. Blanchard,et al.  Conceptualizing and measuring confidence in older drivers: development of the day and night driving comfort scales. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  Jari Viik,et al.  Perceived Mental Stress and Reactions in Heart Rate Variability—A Pilot Study Among Employees of an Electronics Company , 2008, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[19]  Basel Kikhia,et al.  Utilizing a Wristband Sensor to Measure the Stress Level for People with Dementia , 2016, Sensors.

[20]  Peter Chapman,et al.  Mental workload is reflected in driver behaviour, physiology, eye movements and prefrontal cortex activation. , 2018, Applied ergonomics.

[21]  J. Dusek,et al.  Impact of Incremental Increases in Cognitive Workload on Physiological Arousal and Performance in Young Adult Drivers , 2009 .

[22]  Gerhard Tröster,et al.  Monitoring of mental workload levels during an everyday life office-work scenario , 2013, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[23]  A. Craig,et al.  Driver fatigue: electroencephalography and psychological assessment. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[24]  Matthias Beggiato,et al.  Using Smartbands, Pupillometry and Body Motion to Detect Discomfort in Automated Driving , 2018, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[25]  H. Vogel,et al.  Dependence of motion sickness in automobiles on the direction of linear acceleration , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[26]  M. Benedek,et al.  A continuous measure of phasic electrodermal activity , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[27]  Oliver M. J. Carsten,et al.  How can humans understand their automated cars? HMI principles, problems and solutions , 2019, Cognition, Technology & Work.