Cultivating meaning: interpretive fine-tuning of a South African health information system

Abstract A recently conducted piece of micro-level, interpretive IS action research has enabled the delivery of direct user benefits through the adoption of a methodological approach which focuses specifically on the interpretive generation of meaning by authorial individuals. Drawing on recent debates concerning knowledge and identity within social anthropology, IS and social psychology, this approach derives from a theoretical position which acknowledges social constraints on individual behaviour whilst according primacy to individuals’ biographically determined interpretive work. Use of this approach in the field revealed layers of interpretive interaction between users and technology which had hitherto remained invisible and problematic, and allowed several simple practical interventions which strengthened the ability of users to generate their own meanings at critical junctures in the system. It is suggested that such sensitive, low-level ‘fine tuning’ represents a new way forward for those seeking a practical, focused alternative to the more commonplace, high-level research approach within current interpretive IS literature.

[1]  Martyn Hammersley,et al.  Ethnography : Principles in Practice , 1983 .

[2]  K. K. Cetina Sociality with Objects , 1997 .

[3]  R. Bhaskar,et al.  Critical Realism , 2011 .

[4]  Karin D. Knorr-Cetina Sociality with Objects : Social Relations in Postsocial Knowledge Societies , 1997 .

[5]  Jr. Richard J. Boland The Tyranny of Space in Organizational Analysis , 1999 .

[6]  A. Heywood,et al.  District Level Information Systems: Two Cases from South Africa , 1997, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[7]  G. Walsham Making a World of Difference: IT in a Global Context , 2001 .

[8]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[9]  Jørn Braa,et al.  Developing District-based Health Care Information Systems : The South African Experience , 2000 .

[10]  J. Senn,et al.  The challenge of relating IS research to practice , 1998 .

[11]  Matthew R. Jones,et al.  Information systems and the double mangle: steering a course between the Scylla of embedded structure and the Charybdis of strong symmetry , 1998 .

[12]  Dick Pels,et al.  Sociality/Materiality. The Status of the Object in Social Science , 2002 .

[13]  Nigel Rapport,et al.  Diverse world-views in an English village , 1994 .

[14]  Evandro Agazzi,et al.  Advances in the Philosophy of Technology , 1997 .

[15]  R. McDermott Why Information Technology Inspired but Cannot Deliver Knowledge Management , 1999 .

[16]  D. Yanow Seeing Organizational Learning: A `Cultural' View , 2000 .

[17]  Andrew Pickering,et al.  The mangle of practice : time, agency, and science , 1997 .

[18]  F. Blackler Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation , 1995 .

[19]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[20]  A. Clark Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again , 1996 .

[21]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[22]  A. Pickering The Mangle of Practice: Agency and Emergence in the Sociology of Science , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  A. Cohen Self Consciousness: An Alternative Anthropology of Identity , 1994 .

[24]  Judy McKay,et al.  The dual imperatives of action research , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.

[25]  D. Holland Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds , 1998 .

[26]  Jørn Braa,et al.  The Struggle for District-Based Health Information Systems in South Africa , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[27]  A. Giddens Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age , 1992, The New Social Theory Reader.

[28]  C. Geertz,et al.  The Interpretation of Cultures , 1973 .

[29]  M. Engelke,et al.  Postcolonial Identities in Africa , 1998 .

[30]  John Mingers,et al.  Embodying information systems: the contribution of phenomenology , 2001, Inf. Organ..

[31]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Human/Machine Reconsidered , 1998 .

[32]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Learning in Doing: Social, , 1987 .

[33]  Maryam Alavi,et al.  An assessment of the prototyping approach to information systems development , 1984, CACM.

[34]  Richard J. Boland,et al.  The tyranny of space in organizational analysis , 1999, Inf. Organ..

[35]  S. Gherardi Practice-Based Theorizing on Learning and Knowing in Organizations , 2000 .

[36]  J. Gill,et al.  Research Methods For Managers , 1991 .

[37]  Benyamin Lichtenstein,et al.  Relationality in Organizational Research: Exploring The Space Between , 2000 .

[38]  S. Kraemer Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Gregory Bateson , 1993, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[39]  H. Tsoukas The firm as a distributed knowledge system : A constructionist approach , 1996 .